Sentences with phrase «on food animal»

«I am very excited that with this new service, Dr. Stockler will renew the focus on food animal veterinary medicine.

For more information on food animal surgery research, please contact Dr. Nickie Baird.

Type I Shortage situations involve need for a veterinarian to spend at least 80 % of time working on food animal species in a private practice setting.

Type II Shortages involve need for a veterinarian to spend at least 30 % of time working on food animal species, and providing veterinary services in a rural (remote or economically depressed) area in a private practice setting.

Type I Shortage - a veterinarian is needed to spend at least 80 percent of time working on food animal species in a private practice setting.

Type II Shortage — a veterinarian is needed to spend at least 30 percent of time working on food animal species, and provide veterinary services in a rural (remote or economically depressed) area in a private practice setting.

He rarely performs surgery on food animals, especially since OSU's veterinary hospital has both food animal and equine surgeons on faculty.

Twelve students focused on food animals, nine on mixed animal practice and nine on zoological medicine.

Not exact matches

For instance, no tariff elimination took place on animal or vegetable raw materials, which are used as inputs by our food manufacturers.

Tyson New Ventures already made an investment in plant - based food startup Beyond Meat, which also scored funding from General Mills» VC arm 301 Inc. «The reason Beyond Meat made sense to us is because we are focused not only on animal protein, but protein overall,» Hayes said.

But mosquitoes do have a positive impact on the ecosystem like providing food for animals so inclined to consume them.

The US Food and Drug Administration issued a «preliminary finding» that the genetically modified insects, produced by Oxitec at its labs in Oxford, England, and shipped as eggs to Florida, would have essentially «no significant impact» on human health, animal health, or the ecosystem.

Today, we're publishing Beth Kowitt's latest jaw - dropper on the future of the food industry, which explains how biotech is using the fermentation process to synthesize gelatin and other animal products without actually needing input from animals.

Panera Bread offered an update on its food policy on Wednesday, saying it has taken big steps toward reducing the use of antibiotics and confinement of animals in its supply chain.

Sales of the startup's eggless mayo boomed during 2015's avian bird flu epidemic — an incident that revealed much about the fragile nature of Earth's reliance on animals for food.

«This new policy is further testament that consumers and companies are aligned in shifting the egg and pork industries away from confining animals in cages,» said Josh Balk, senior food policy director of the Humane Society of the United States, who has partnered with Dunkin' Donuts (DNKN) on the initiative.

These measures also suggest Americans are more likely to die from gun violence than the combined risks of drowning, fire and smoke, stabbing, choking on food, airplane crashes, animal attacks, and forces of nature.

And if some of the tenets of the foodie cause, like being pro-organic or anti-GMO, are built on shaky evidence, others, like concern for animal welfare in large corporate farms or the impact of eating a diet heavy in processed foods, are not.

This would jeopardize the lives of many types of crabs, mussels, and sea snails that live in tidal zones and disrupt the diets of larger animals who rely on them for food, threatening entire coastal ecosystems in the process.

In its most recent report on the state of global fisheries, the United Nations» Food and Agriculture Organization warned that 90 percent of the world's fish stocks are fully or overfished, and increasing production to meet the world's growing demand for animal protein can't be done in a sustainable manner.

«McDonald's once led its industry on animal welfare — most notably, with its pledge to eliminate cruel gestation crates for pigs from its supply chain — but it has since fallen behind other major food retailers.

Easterbrook, who has vowed to remake McDonald's as a «modern, progressive burger company,» has been taking steps to bolster the taste and quality of McDonald's food by using butter instead of margarine on Egg McMuffins and switching to cage - free eggs and chicken from animals raised with fewer antibiotics.

If a pet food company, were to display a blue Kickin» It logo on their cans, bowls, collars etc., a portion of the proceeds would be donated to organizations helping to «Kick» animal abuse and neglect.

Biotech accelerator IndieBio has placed many bets in animal - free foods, with notable investments in Memphis Meats, New Wave Foods, and Finless Foods, as well as startups focusing on dairy and gelatin substitutes.

During the quarter, Lilly's animal health revenues fell 9 % year - over-year to $ 706.2 million, which the company blamed on irregular wholesale buying patterns in companion animal health and an overall drop in demand on the food - animal side of the business.

Soybeans gained on speculation that government measures to revive economies may bolster demand for food, animal feed and biofuels.

The Good Food Institute (GFI) is on the forefront of the movement to use food technology and markets to solve some of the world's biggest problems, from climate change and global hunger to antibiotic resistance and the exploitation of billions of animals annuaFood Institute (GFI) is on the forefront of the movement to use food technology and markets to solve some of the world's biggest problems, from climate change and global hunger to antibiotic resistance and the exploitation of billions of animals annuafood technology and markets to solve some of the world's biggest problems, from climate change and global hunger to antibiotic resistance and the exploitation of billions of animals annually.

The Good Food Institute has a team of scientists, entrepreneurs, lawyers, and lobbyists, all of whom are laser - focused on using markets and food technology to transform our food system away from factory farmed animal products and toward clean meat and plant - based alternatiFood Institute has a team of scientists, entrepreneurs, lawyers, and lobbyists, all of whom are laser - focused on using markets and food technology to transform our food system away from factory farmed animal products and toward clean meat and plant - based alternatifood technology to transform our food system away from factory farmed animal products and toward clean meat and plant - based alternatifood system away from factory farmed animal products and toward clean meat and plant - based alternatives.

GFI argues that though it is true that plant - based products already exist, there may be significant room for the improvement of plant - based technology, and improving plant - based technology may yield shorter - term traction, i.e., greater market share, than the cultured foods.119 Recently developed plant - based products already seem to seem to represent improvements from past products; for example, the Impossible Burger, released in 2016, has received favorable reviews from vegans and omnivores alike.120 GFI's fostering and promotion of the development of similarly popular plant - based products could cause a significant reduction in the demand for animal products, particularly if they focus on plant - based chicken and fish and if they convince institutions to serve the plant - based products rather than animal products.121

We [achieve our mission] by harnessing the power of markets and food technology to create alternatives to industrial animal agriculture that are delicious, cost competitive, and convenient -LSB-...] Fifteen years ago, plant - based milk represented roughly 0 % of the milk market; now it is at 10 % -LSB-...] GFI is laser - focused on replicating (and exceeding!)

While Judaism contains the oldest known humane limits on the use of animals (e.g., harming an animal is punishable, slaughter must be painless, they must be fed before one's children, they are to rest on the Sabbath, etc.), it does not eliminate animals for use as food, manufacture, or for ritual.

The entire economy of the city of Jerusalem was built on temple activities, bathing before the offerings for a fee, dressing for going to the temple, for a fee, buying the offerings, for a fee, paying the priests, temple entrance fees, food prep fees, growing and feeding the animals for the sacrifices, being paid for them, in the thousands and thousands at festival times, ALL in Jewish currency only, which was required for their rituals, and most people used Roman currency for their civil affairs.

I would turn to science to back me up on this as there a scientific facts that prove animals suffer for our selfish abuse to use them as a food source.

All animals which live in the water and on land, such as frogs, crocodiles, turtles, and the like, are forbidden as food.

He is in the company of wild animals, and angels «were waiting on him»; that is, serving him food.

There's no evidence of a global flood in the geological record, the logistics of getting animals from and returning them to the then - unknown Americas and Australia, there is not enough water to cover all land (i.e. Everest) and if there were where did it go, the flood would have killed all life on earth that was not in the Ark, the issue of food for all animals, the issue of predation.

For one, a patch of land can provide a full and balanced diet for more people if the people eat the food that grows on it rather than feed the food to an animal and then eat the animal.

Using a minimum of 30 pounds per day for each elephant, that equals 21,600 pounds of food for ONLY TWO of the millions of animals on board for a year.

But cruelty to animals is morally different from human predation on animals — eating animals» flesh and using their hides and other parts for clothing, food or shelter.

We need to realize that overall food production on this planet since the domestication of plants and animals has been on an unsustainable basis.

There are two slight differences: from now on human beings may kill animals for food.

It's a hard pill to swallow Anna, (also again I see you don't address all the other issues that come with Noah actually living on his big ark with all those animals for 40 days apparently without food — unless of course there was a long list of animals that didn't make the cut).

Every known land animal on one ship with food for a year?

While the British Veterinary Association has called for a ban on non-stun animal slaughter, the practise is endorsed by the Halal Food Authority - a body which promotes adherence to Islamic law in food productFood Authority - a body which promotes adherence to Islamic law in food productfood production.

God has animals preying on each other, for food.

My favorite of course is ask most mainstream christians some simple questions like, «So you believe that the earth was created in seven days», «so noah gathered every animal on earth and stuck them inside a small boat for 40 days without fresh water and food to feed everything and you think this actually happened?»

You said in regard to God has animals preying on each other, for food., «FWIW, the creation story suggests that was the way things were, and Revelation suggests that's the way things will be.

The ark could not have contained more than a very small proportion of the animal life on the globe, to say nothing of the food needed for them, nor could eight people have attended to their wants, nor apart from a constant miracle could the very different conditions they required in order to live at all have been supplied.

That verse suggests the creatues on - board the ark would have needed to eat, so food was brought on - board for them, which only makes the story even more implausible, since not only would the ark have needed to house all those animals for about a year according to the Priestly Source version, but also food for them as well.

How can you logically believe that Noah and his family managed to fit two of every animal on Earth (and the food to keep them all alive, not to mention how did they deal with all the poo from the thousands of animals, also... the travel necessary to accomplish such an illogical feat could not have been accomplished in one lifetime, even with today's travel technnology) in an ark that was 300 cubits x 50 cubits x 30 cubits (450 ft x 75 ft x 45 ft) and also believe that the 8 people that survived the «global flood» on the ark repopulated the planet?