The environmental threats and economic costs of continued reliance
on fossil fuel technologies are sufficiently urgent to warrant substantially larger public support in the form of private - sector R&D incentives and a refocusing of effort by the national energy laboratories on the development and diffusion of alternative energy technologies.
In Cloud Peak's view, staying in the agreement and trying to encourage «a more balanced, reasonable and appropriate path forward»
on fossil fuel technologies among signatories to the accord seems like a reasonable stance, said Cloud Peak's vice president of government affairs, Richard Reavey.
Not exact matches
Elon Musk is very enthusiastic in pushing for the widespread use of solar energy to replace
fossil fuels, so it was no surprise that the Tesla continues to focus
on improving its
technology for energy storage — if the car manufacturer's gigafactory is any indication of that.
The remaining funds went towards two companies aimed at reducing humanity's dependence
on fossil fuels and so counteracting the problem of climate change: Tesla Motors ($ 70m), a luxury electric car manufacturer that has since expanded to provide energy to homes and businesses through battery
technology; and SolarCity ($ 10m) which seeks to offer a cleaner and more affordable energy solution.
CST Wastewater Solutions Managing Director Mr Mike Bambridge will be
on hand to discuss these latest wastewater and green energy
technologies that not only clean wastewater to top world standards, but also extract biogas to substitute for
fossil fuel in boilers and to generate electricity.
CCN is embarking
on an environmental initiative that will see it use
technology from international green energy leader Global Water Engineering to harvest biogas (methane) energy from waste water to replace
fossil fuels and provide reliable base load energy while simultaneously achieving much cleaner effluent.
Mr Bambridge says this the plant indirectly reduces the brewery's carbon footprint by reducing the brewery's demands
on fossil fuels and the electricity needs for wastewater treatment by using energy - friendly anaerobic pre-treatment
technology in which GWE is a world leader.
He condemned Tony Blair's support for nuclear power as a way of reducing Britain's reliance
on fossil fuels, saying: «Nuclear
technology is tried, tested and failed.
This initiative will create numerous jobs and move our region into the 21st century by working with green
technologies that reduce our reliance
on the combustion of
fossil fuels.»
On her campaign website, Deacon said scientists have reached a consensus on climate change so she wants to transition away from fossil fuel energy sources, invest in clean energy technology and support federal acts to protect natural resource
On her campaign website, Deacon said scientists have reached a consensus
on climate change so she wants to transition away from fossil fuel energy sources, invest in clean energy technology and support federal acts to protect natural resource
on climate change so she wants to transition away from
fossil fuel energy sources, invest in clean energy
technology and support federal acts to protect natural resources.
The focus of this
technology is
on the large - scale reduction of carbon emissions from
fossil -
fuelled power plants.
By adopting lighting
technologies that use less energy the nations of the world will cut down
on the
fossil fuels, often coal, burned to produce that light.
The event commemorates the 5 November 1965 President's Council of Advisors
on Science and
Technology (PCAST) report to President Lyndon B. Johnson, which warned that the accumulation of atmospheric carbon dioxide from the burning of
fossil fuels would «almost certainly cause significant changes» to the environment.
The cost benefits and climate advantages are among the reasons that five countries run national research programs
on the technique; is the United States falling behind
on the next big
fossil fuel technology?
All emerging
technologies are helping to pave the way to a reduced - petroleum future, and there is no single solution to our dependence
on fossil fuels.
Turning down Keystone makes the statement that it is time to stop investing in
technologies that lock us into continued
fossil fuel use, and to make a bigger play
on efficiency and carbon - neutral energy (including nuclear).
For example, a tax
on fossil fuel burned would spur investment in cleaner energy
technologies, such as renewables or nuclear power.
Moreover, in those cases, the gap between the leading - edge
technologies and the competitors trying to catch up is
on aggregate twice as great for the
fossil -
fuel firms than the clean -
technology firms; that is, the dirty energy companies are generally farther ahead of the other firms in their fields.
With the world still heavily reliant
on fossil fuels to meet its energy needs, carbon sequestration
technologies could help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
By 2020, IEA expects photovoltaic
technology fitted
on residential and commercial buildings to reach «grid parity,» or the point at which solar power is consistently cost - competitive with conventional
fossil fuels and nuclear power.
The long - term goal, the report concluded, is to identify
technologies that can work in a hybrid system that offers consistency, dependability and doesn't rely
on fossil fuels.
It is also clear, Ban Ki - moon says, that the
technologies already exist for the world to turn its back
on fossil fuels and cut emissions of greenhouse gases to a safe level.
Environmental groups are concerned that if left to their own devices, cash - strapped member states won't do much to boost the deployment of renewable energy
technology and lower their dependence
on fossil fuels.
«Since the transition away from
fossil fuels is likely to take a very long time, we foresee a long - term need to deal with coal - based emissions and, therefore, the sooner we begin to develop [carbon capture and storage]
technology, the better,» Austin - based energy policy specialist Scott Anderson of Environmental Defense told a Senate panel earlier this year during a hearing
on CCS
technology.
Yet at this forum, an
on - campus debate at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology over whether the university should divest the
fossil fuel holdings within its $ 11 billion endowment, might not have happened if market forces properly priced the economic and environmental costs of climate change, a theme that Anthony Cortese, the event moderator, alluded to at the outset.
Peters co-authored a paper published last year warning that staking the future only
on negative emissions
technologies presents a «moral hazard» because they're unproven, there is a substantial risk that the
technology can't be scaled up, and it may allow policymakers to think that weaning humanity away from
fossil fuels is not urgent.
Calling
fossil fuels an antiquated
technology, like whale oil, Mann points out that alternative energy is growing even without subsidies or a price
on carbon.
Why It Matters: Reducing our nation's reliance
on fossil fuels relies
on creating
technologies to quickly and efficiently convert the power generated at wind farms and other sources into a use - any - time
fuel, such as hydrogen molecules.
Our concentrating solar power (CSP)
technology exists to produce clean energy, address climate change, improve air quality and reduce dependence
on fossil fuels.
RD&D
on carbon capture and storage (CCS)
technology is needed, especially given our conclusion that the current atmospheric CO2 level is already in the dangerous zone, but continuing issues with CCS
technology [7], [244] make it inappropriate to construct
fossil fuel power plants with a promise of future retrofit for carbon capture.
Including Market Pull
Technology push, product analysis, Globalisation, Consumer rights Also includes a full lesson
on Fossil fuels Full lesson
on Renewable energy Full lesson
on Smart Materials Also included is a guide to creating systems diagrams and a sample of the Genie Microcontroller How 2 More resources to be added soon
DETROIT — Tour the North American International Auto Show here — you have until tomorrow, if you're one of those last - minute types — and you can find lots of touted environmentally friendly
technology on concept and production vehicles designed to lessen our dependence
on fossil fuels.
The Index is comprised U.S. - listed companies that are significantly involved in transitional energy bridge
technologies, with an emphasis
on improving the use of
fossil fuels.
Re # 43, A «collosal political jump forward» would be for the US to strip all subsidies from the
fossil fuel industry, and to strip all subsidies from
fossil -
fuel intensive agricultural industry as well (over $ 35 billion a year), and to deliver those subsidies to solar, wind, and carbon - neutral agricultural industries — as well as instituting a hefty carbon tax
on all
fossil fuels, and agreeing to strict emissions caps, and mandating energy efficient
technology in all areas.
And that's because ALTERNATIVE ENERGY
TECHNOLOGIES RELY
ON FOSSIL FUELS THROUGH EVERY STAGE OF THEIR LIFE.
Energy is not the same as CO2: it's perfectly possible to get all the energy we really need without burning
fossil fuels, the arguments have been about which
technologies to use, how much they'll cost, and how soon they might be brought
on line.
Dr. Depledge described signs of a shift in the oil kingdom's stance, including its endorsement of science pointing to big impacts from a building human influence
on climate and commitment of money to pursue
technologies for capturing carbon dioxide from the burning of
fossil fuels and other new energy options.
The transition from deeply rooted energy systems based
on burning
fossil fuels to new norms emitting ever less of this gas — here and in China — is seen by many as requiring a sustained energy quest including much greater direct government investment
on the frontiers of relevant
technologies (batteries, photovoltaics, superconductivity, photosynthesis).]
The researchers also see potential for this new
technology in electric cars and other uses where a flexible power - generating fabric could make life easier and reduce our dependence
on fossil fuels.
For ethanol there is in deed a big question here, but the DOE study
on biodiesel claims that you get 3.5 units of biodiesel energy out for each unit of
fossil fuel energy you put in; with better
technology and crops, it can ge better.
She said that the analysis she and co-authors did for a paper
on «irreversible climate change» helped lead her, as a non-expert citizen when considering energy
technology, to conclude that such research is vital, even as efforts are made to find successors to
fossil fuels.
However, if we set limits for ourselves we will then along with many other industrialized nations be developing the
technology that will allow China to grow without relying
on fossil fuels alone.
By the 2040s, the Blueprints world sees renewable energy
technologies compete
on price against
fossil fuels, which are well managed with carbon capture and storage.
i'm sad to see that andy has not asked the most fundamental (and terrifying) question: can
technology alone substitute for the cheap and abundant energy of
fossil fuels on which advanced industrial civilization has become utterly dependent?
Trillions are spent
on war where oil is the key political factor, hundreds of billions
on subsidies for rich companies that reap huge short - term profits, both in
fossil fuels and pseudo-green
technologies like corn ethanol and biodiesel.
The Council of the American Physical Society believes that the use of renewable energy sources, the adoption of new ways of producing and using
fossil fuels, increased consideration of safe and cost effective uses of nuclear power, and the introduction of energy - efficient
technologies can, over time, promote the United States» energy security and reduce stress
on the world's environment.
We need to do a «full court press» to switch from
fossil fuels and nuclear (which also releases heat into water
on a large scale, and supports nuclear military programs), using existing and near - commercialization battery, solar and wind
technology, and design systems to cost - effectively convert the existing 600 - million - plus vehicle fleet rather than waiting for replacement.
One issue, of course, is that while the focus is
on developing or refining energy
technologies with limited or no emissions of greenhouse gases, the discussion is taking place in a world where real - time pressures are driving the expansion of conventional
fossil fuel menus to keep up with ballooning global energy demand.
The price differential between hybrids and
fossil fuel cars could be removed at a stroke if sales tax levels were set based
on a car's GHG emissions per mile, and this would be likely to make a huge difference to take - up of hybrids — again, the problem is not
technology, it is simply lack of political will.
Second, if divestment were to reduce the financial resources of coal, oil, and gas companies (which it would NOT do), this would only reduce research and development at those same companies of: carbon capture and storage
technologies; other key technological breakthroughs; and renewable sources of energy (the
fossil fuel companies are carrying out much of the R&D
on renewables).