When Grassley learned of Han's fraud, he wrote to the ORI, arguing that the 3 - year ban on federal research funding «seems like a very light penalty for a doctor who purposely tampered with a research trial and directly caused millions of taxpayer dollars to be wasted
on fraudulent studies.»
Not exact matches
Wildstein testified that it was his «understanding» from his former superior Bill Baroni — a Christie appointee now facing federal charges — that that the New York and New Jersey governors colluded to blame the shut down of lanes headed into Fort Lee
on a
fraudulent «traffic
study.»
The original 1998 Lancet article purporting to tie vaccines to autism was found to be based
on fraudulent data and retracted; its lead author, Andrew Wakefield, has been barred from practicing medicine in the U.K. «My fear is that people will think that we have not done these
studies.
These powerful companies spend billions to ensure you will be buying their products by using dishonest business practices, rigged clinical
studies showing their products in a favorable light, public relations campaigns (like the
fraudulent Breast Cancer Awareness Month — started by the manufacturer of mammogram machines), articles from paid «experts»
on the internet and news clips to make you believe their products are healthy and safe, and lobbying Washington to enact laws ensuring you don't have healthy alternatives to their products.
A
study based
on non-existent and / or
fraudulent data, of which
The New American has published many stories over the years debunking the claim that there is a «consensus of science»
on man - made global warming, particularly exposing the flawed and
fraudulent studies by Naomi Oreskes and John Cook that have been cited innumerable times to manufacture the «97 percent of scientists agree» myth.
Now the general public is
on the hook to pay down a deficit generated from
fraudulent data and «scientists» that strung them along all these years not including the monies spent
on «
studies» and legislation that went thru the roof and the time and money
on them.
Countries are spending countless billions of dollars annually
on faulty to
fraudulent IPCC climate models and
studies that purport to link every adverse event or problem to manmade climate change; subsidized renewable energy programs that displace food crops and kill wildlife; adaptation and mitigation measures against future disasters that exist only in «scenarios» generated by the IPCC's GIGO computer models; and welfare, food stamp and energy assistance programs for the newly unemployed and impoverished.