After all, almost all climate scientists frowned
on geoengineering research, even on public discussion of it, for many years.
Informed citizens and civil society organizations around the world can guide next steps
on geoengineering research governance.
Not exact matches
A geophysicist at the University of Washington and director of the Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, he is at the forefront of
research on geoengineering, a science that focuses
on manipulating the environment to, among other ends, combat climate change.
Other recent
research on geoengineering using solar radiation management has also found that if the practice did begin but was then stopped, it could lead to rapid climate change with potentially hazardous consequences (ClimateWire, Nov. 27, 2013).
Last year, the United Nation's Convention
on Biological Diversity issued a statement forbidding
geoengineering research that may impact biodiversity.
Rabe, who conducted the survey with Christopher Borick, director of the Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Opinion, said public opinion
research on geoengineering is limited.
Rasch addressed the Subcommittees
on Energy and Environment about the need for a
research program to study
geoengineering and how such a program might be designed.
Therefore, the American Meteorological Society recommends: 1) Enhanced
research on the scientific and technological potential for
geoengineering the climate system, including
research on the unintended as well as intended environmental responses.
It may be that an understanding of the geobiology of ant - mineral interactions might offer a line of
research on how to «
geoengineer» accelerated carbon dioxide consumption by Ca - Mg silicates.
The report, by a panel of experts convened by the society, says more
research is needed
on geoengineering techniques, and that it should involve international collaborations and discussions with the public.
(That's one of the reasons I think that the talk about
geoengineering is essential, and even more essential than bloviation
on that front is practical
research, testing and efforts to build management systems.
Here are two fresh statements,
on geoengineering and
on the choices being made by Congress — at least so far — in regard to financing for basic energy
research as a component of federal legislation
on climate:
To be clear: I am not a climate sceptic, but I do feel deeply uncomfortable with the suggestion that ever more
research on geoengineering — in particular solar radiation management (SRM)-- is required in order to prepare the world for an impending climatic emergency.
This week's front page New York Times story
on geoengineering highlights the need for inclusive and informed discussion
on how to responsibly manage
research into emerging
geoengineering technologies.
For example, in a 2011 op - ed calling for more
research on geoengineering, Mark Lynas insisted that «playing God is good for the planet.»
We need more than a coordinated
research program which considers
geoengineering — we need a coordinated, interdisciplinary
research program
on energy futures that goes beyond what is «possible» at a certain oil price.
His current areas of
research focus are: climate
geoengineering; international climate change litigation; adaptation strategies to address climate change, with a focus
on the potential role of micro-insurance; and the effectiveness of the European Union's Emissions Trading System.
First, modification of individual hurricanes would fall under the topic of weather modification, rather than climate
geoengineering; and second, there is not nearly as much
research on [hurricane modification] as
on the possible effects of climate
geoengineering on slowing the melting of ice sheets.
Bipartisan Policy Center Task Force
on Climate Remediation
Research, Geoengineering: A national strategic plan for research on the potential effectiveness, feasibility, and consequences of climate remediation technologies (BPC, Washington, DC, 2011); http://bipartisanpolicy.org/library/report/task-force-climate-remediation-r
Research,
Geoengineering: A national strategic plan for
research on the potential effectiveness, feasibility, and consequences of climate remediation technologies (BPC, Washington, DC, 2011); http://bipartisanpolicy.org/library/report/task-force-climate-remediation-r
research on the potential effectiveness, feasibility, and consequences of climate remediation technologies (BPC, Washington, DC, 2011); http://bipartisanpolicy.org/library/report/task-force-climate-remediation-
researchresearch.
In Issues, a pioneer in
geoengineering has laid out the framework for a comprehensive US
research plan, saying it should be part of a coherent climate policy agenda that includes vigorous support for climate science, increases efforts to cut emissions, helps the most vulnerable populations to adapt, develops negative emission technologies, and renews a commitment to growing international governance
on climate matters.
I implored the editor to go to geoengineeringwatch.org and do more
research on geoengineering and the fact it's been going
on right over our heads for decades.
On the Geoengineering Watch site, the rationale for the alleged geoengineering is, actually, the real motivation behind research on SRM — that global warming is out of contro
On the
Geoengineering Watch site, the rationale for the alleged geoengineering is, actually, the real motivation behind research on SRM — that global warming is o
Geoengineering Watch site, the rationale for the alleged
geoengineering is, actually, the real motivation behind research on SRM — that global warming is o
geoengineering is, actually, the real motivation behind
research on SRM — that global warming is out of contro
on SRM — that global warming is out of control.
Andy Parker is a
Research Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS) in Potsdam, focusing on the politics and governance of research into solar geoengi
Research Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS) in Potsdam, focusing
on the politics and governance of
research into solar geoengi
research into solar
geoengineering.
Amongst other roles he served
on the UK
Research Councils» stage-gate panel for the Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering (SPICE) project review and is a member of the Integrated Assessment of
Geoengineering Potential (IAGP) project advisory group.
First, justifications offered for scientific
research on geoengineering already involve value judgments of their own, and ethicists are trained to clarify and assess value judgments.
So, all in all, I emerged from my
research effort willing to advocate a certain amount of
research on geoengineering, while also believing that for now and the foreseeable future there should be a moratorium
on large scale testing.
This PCIC Science Brief focuses
on recent
research in the journal Climatic Change that examines a type of
geoengineering that involves using biomass for energy production, together with carbon capture and storage.
That's the debate to have, and anyone I know who does
research on solar
geoengineering is happy to have it.
Michael has just completed his MSc in Atmospheric Science at UVic, where his
research focused
on the climate impacts of shortwave radiation management
geoengineering.
Around 60 percent of all social media discourse
on geoengineering is conspiratorial, according to co-authored
research I published last year.
The geo - clique are lobbying for a huge injection of public funds into
geoengineering research, justified
on the grounds that «the world» (read America in the era of the Tea Party) will never countenance the carbon abatement policies we so badly need.
First, it may suggest that more
research on solar
geoengineering is the only rational choice since many of the relevant equity concerns are empirical matters, amenable to resolution through the provision of more science.
The first is a call for more solar
geoengineering research as a means to shed light
on the distributional outcomes of envisioned futures with and without solar
geoengineering.
In this context, a small group of experts advocating for more
research into solar
geoengineering — what we term, following Stephen Hilgartner, «sociotechnical vanguards,» — are justifying a call for more
research, sometimes
on equity grounds.
This weekend at Moffett Field, California, NASA's Ames
Research Center hosts a closed - door, high - level workshop
on the global haze proposal and other «
geoengineering» ideas for fending off climate change.
The Americans — who published their findings
on Sunday in Nature Climate Change — ran two different climate models, CAM3.5 and HadCM3L — the one devised by the US National Center for Atmospheric
Research and the other by the UK Met Office's Hadley Centre and simulated a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentrations, temperature - compensating stratospheric solar radiation management (SRM)
geoengineering — and compared precipitation changes.
Posted in
Research Blogging, tagged carbon cycle, climate change, climate models, education,
geoengineering, global warming, ocean acidification, programming, science, sea ice
on September 16, 2012 14 Comments»
Anchored in notions of place and identity, the HSRC marks a novel entry point into social
research on geoengineering, which enables a more situated engagement with ocean fertilization, in keeping with geographical traditions.
Burns»
research primarily focuses
on climate
geoengineering governance — or, the deliberate and large - scale intervention of our climate system with the goal of counteracting climate change, and the policies needed to achieve that goal.
Respectively they were the chair and senior policy adviser for the Royal Society's landmark report
on geoengineering in 2009, and today they are co-chair and project director for an international initiative to expand discussion of the governance of solar
geoengineering research to developing countries (www.srmgi.org).
Surprisingly (to us at least),
geoengineering research was identified as the number one priority in the list of most efficient climate policy options while policies to put a price
on carbon appeared dead last.
It's good to see so many people willing to speak out
on line, as they continue
researching the chemtrail /
geoengineering issue and educating others who care about what's happening.
The report
on albedo modification draws from Long and Scott's (2013) work
on vested interests in
geoengineering research, identifying «the four Fs», or factors that should be considered in
research design and execution.
Rachel Smolker and Almuth Ernsting of Biofuelwatch agreed, repeating a claim commonly made by opponents of
research on geoengineering: «the negative effects of different types of
geoengineering would likely be felt most dramatically in the global South.»
How the ledger is likely to balance out globally, and particularly for the global South, is unknown, yet that is precisely the reason why more
research on solar
geoengineering is so urgently needed.
In other words, in the face of poor progress
on mitigation, let's not be caught with our pants down again, and start talking about (and
researching and testing)
geoengineering while there is still time.
The answer is not entirely clear, but part of it is undoubtedly related to the nature of the computer modeling work that has constituted most scientific
research on solar
geoengineering to date.
The arguments raised against such a concern by advocates for
geoengineering research often include ones from three groups: first, largely semantic objections to the term «moral hazard»; second, arguments that taking
on more climate risk would be the rational response; and third, claims that experience with the adaptation debate somehow disproves the effect.
The Carnegie Climate
Geoengineering Governance Initiative aims» to encourage the development of governance for
research on climate geo - engineering that is balanced between enabling and regulatory aspects.»
Most students supported further
research on geoengineering and a little over half supported piloting a small - scale test in some part of the world.