One study, for example, calculated that over the 50 - year period of 1961 to 2010, the direct monetary benefits atmospheric CO2 enrichment conferred
on global crop production amounted to a staggering $ 3.2 trillion.
One recent study calculated that over the 50 - year period ending in 2001, the direct monetary benefits conferred by the atmospheric CO2 enrichment of the Industrial Revolution
on global crop production amounted to a staggering $ 3.2 trillion.
The results of this model - based study fall in line with the previous work of Idso (2013), who calculated similar CO2 - induced benefits
on global crop production by mid-century based on real - world experimental data, both of which studies reveal that policy prescriptions designed to limit the upward trajectory of atmospheric CO2 concentrations can have very real, and potentially serious, repercussions for global food security.
«It's the first time that a scientific study compared different methods of estimating temperature impacts
on global crop production.
Not exact matches
With the US accounting for roughly 40 percent of
global corn
production, poor
crops there have a dramatic impact
on corn prices.
Professor Bruce Fitt, professor of plant pathology at the University of Hertfordshire's School of Medical and Life Sciences, said: «There is considerable debate about the impact of climate change
on crop production — and making sure that we have sufficient food to feed the ever - growing
global population is key to our future food security.»
He said a study he authored
on pollinators found that, as of 2015, 5 % to 8 % of current
global crop production was attributable to pollinators, translating to an economic value of between $ 235 billion to $ 577 billion.
Production systems such as monocultures that cultivate
crops (for example, palm oil and sugar cane) for
global distribution may benefit local communities with employment and funding opportunities, but are often reliant
on over-exploited water resources.
The United Nations predicts that
global crop production will need to increase by 70 percent
on the land we're currently using by the year 2050 in order to feed the world population.
Centre for Jatropha Promotion & Biodiesel (CJP) is the
Global authority for scientific commercialization of Jatropha & other non-food biofuel
crops and designs and implements the growing of non-food biofuel
crops worldwide in a structured Agri - Supply chain, Value additions and research activities thereon & provides technology and services from «Soil to Oil» for the breeding, development, planting and harvesting of next - generation commercial biofuel
crops CJP has been engaged in promoting sustainable farming for biodiesel
production since last one decade and its research findings and
on - hand field experiences in respect of various technical, agronomical / silvicultural aspects of plantations of Jatropha have resulted in significant improvements in knowledge and technical background related to Productivity, profitability and sustainability of commercial
production of Jatropha oil
crop.
FThe
global industrial food system relies
on crops that have been bred primarily for higher yield and ease of transport, while farmers involved in local food systems often place a higher value
on plant varietals that are more nutritious by virtue of their variety (i.e., not bred for yield alone) or by their method of
production.
The scope of this chapter, with a focus
on food
crops, pastures and livestock, industrial
crops and biofuels, forestry (commercial forests), aquaculture and fisheries, and small - holder and subsistence agriculturalists and artisanal fishers, is to: examine current climate sensitivities / vulnerabilities; consider future trends in climate,
global and regional food security, forestry and fisheries
production; review key future impacts of climate change in food
crops pasture and livestock
production, industrial
crops and biofuels, forestry, fisheries, and small - holder and subsistence agriculture; assess the effectiveness of adaptation in offsetting damages and identify adaptation options, including planned adaptation to climate change; examine the social and economic costs of climate change in those sectors; and, explore the implications of responding to climate change for sustainable development.
It aims to provide a review of the literature
on crop pollination, with a focus
on the effects of climate change
on pollinators important for
global crop production, and to present an overview of available data
on the temperature sensitivity of
crop pollinators and entomophilous
crops.
Searching for agricultural research, about affect
global cooling would have
on crop production, and what steps should be taken to protect against that.
At a time when
global warming is projected to produce more extreme weather, the study provides the most comprehensive look yet at the influence of such events
on crop area, yields and
production around the world.
«The CCR - II report correctly explains that most of the reports
on global warming and its impacts
on sea - level rise, ice melts, glacial retreats, impact
on crop production, extreme weather events, rainfall changes, etc. have not properly considered factors such as physical impacts of human activities, natural variability in climate, lopsided models used in the prediction of
production estimates, etc..
A small increase in
global mean temperature actually increases the number of hot and extreme heat days per year, which can have strong negative impacts
on crop production.
About a year ago
on this blog, I offered some skeptical commentary about the gloomy testimony of Dr. Christopher Field of the Carnegie Institution for Science, who warned the House Energy & Commerce Committee that
global warming would inflict major losses
on U.S. corn
crop production unless scientists develop varieties with improved heat resistence.
It reviews academic literature and research focused
on the
global phenomena of
crop cultivation, livestock
production, and food product distribution in urban contexts.
The present study addresses this deficiency by providing a quantitative estimate of the direct monetary benefits conferred by atmospheric CO2 enrichment
on both historic and future
global crop production.
Comparing impacts for
crop production, extreme weather and sea level rise, for example, at different
global temperatures means flipping
on their head the way climate projections are traditionally constructed.