Sentences with phrase «on global warming denialists»

Some of our earlier posts on the global warming denial machine and ExxonMobil: «The Denial Machine» — Canadian TV to air investigative documentary on global warming denialists (October 26)(Includes interview with CSW Director Rick Piltz.

Not exact matches

The less data you collect on global warming, the more room there is for a handful of denialists to claim that it isn't really happening — that's been the story on ocean warming for the past decade, hasn't it?

In fact, I was by default not doubting the global warming classic interpretation till I started reading multiple sources on the net, and as my self - confession as a recent skeptic shows, the argument from the denialist camp are not only convincing to petrol gulping rednecks, but also to a very scientifically minded, atheist european (although, I must admit, I like motor sports; — RRB --RRB-.

We've seen a bizarre (well, if you know the climate denialist scene, not so bizarre) misreporting about Millar et al., focusing on the claim that climate models have supposedly overestimated global warming.

I have no idea what you are referring to, except perhaps that the rote regurgitation of long - since and many - times - over debunked denialist nonsense is mercifully (and no doubt laboriously) deleted by the RC moderators — unlike every other open blog on the Internet where any attempt to discuss the science of anthropogenic global warming is quickly drowned out by a torrent of pseudoscience, conspiracy theories, blatant falsehoods, and hate speech against climate scientists.

But despite the onslaught from the influential denialists, the fact remains that — according to Oreskes» own figures — 62 % of the US public «believe that life on Earth will continue without major disruptions only if society takes immediate and drastic action to reduce global warming».

He maunders on to accuse «climate denialists» of drawing inconvenient conclusions from the recent temperature record about the rate of global warming.

It is always good to keep an eye on our denialists, learn their tricks, whether it is nicotine, evolution or global warming...

The investigative blogger Deep Climate has been working to set the record straight on how an orchestrated campaign by members of Congress, industry - funded global warming denialist groups and PR operatives, and professional «skeptics» has spread misleading information about the paleoclimate... Continue reading →

The explanation for this, though, rests on an understanding of wider political and economic interests — could it be, perhaps, that this is the result of the billions of pounds pumped into the economy by professional denialist foundations such as Nigel Lawson's Global Warming Policy Foundation and the legions of right wing Tory backers (not to mention the combined, and substantial efforts, of the global oil industry and other vested interests) which influence, through their ownership, most of the mainstream Global Warming Policy Foundation and the legions of right wing Tory backers (not to mention the combined, and substantial efforts, of the global oil industry and other vested interests) which influence, through their ownership, most of the mainstream global oil industry and other vested interests) which influence, through their ownership, most of the mainstream media?

With the IPCC increasingly in the spotlight, the denialists can trivialize the entire environmental crisis simply by casting doubt on the scientific consensus on global warming.

Regardless of what one thinks of cap - and - trade as a policy approach, nothing looks likely to change in that arena in the near - foreseeable future, except for greater numbers on the no - compromise corporate and global warming denialist side.

Yet, as Festinger would have predicted, instead of falling silent, perhaps even admitting error, the denialists have become more vehement in their attacks on climate scientists, environmentalists and anyone who accepts the evidence for global warming.

Senator James Inhofe, ranking Republican on the Environment and Public Works Committee, has gone a step beyond promoting his long - notorious global warming denialist propaganda.

So global - warming - denialist brochures are printed on glossy paper.

For years, the more dimwitted of the climate denialists have been yammering on about a pause in global warming.

First, let me comment on the ABC's decision to screen the denialist documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle.

«Since Day 1 of this I have been calling it a non-event, a manufactured controversy by global warming denialists trying to make enough noise to drown out any real talk on this topic.»

This, of course, is why the denialist community harps on «CAGW» — catastrophic anthropogenic global warming — despite the fact that this is not a scientific term (i.e. commonly used by scientists).

Looks like the denialist claim that global warming peaked in 1998 is clearly shot down (as if it had any legs to stand on in the first place): http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article2116873.ece

The «hockey stick» may be a cause celebre among denialists, but it's only a secondary part of the mainstream case for global warming, which is based on the physics of the greenhouse effect and the observed warming of recent decades.

on Misrepresentation of leaked review draft IPCC climate assessment report shows intellectual bankruptcy of global warming denialists

From ClimateScienceWatch: «Senator James Inhofe, ranking Republican on the Environment and Public Works Committee, has gone a step beyond promoting his long - notorious global warming denialist propaganda.