In addition, a large majority of superintendents reported positive impacts on the professional growth of both teachers and administrators, and
on high expectations for student learning.
Not exact matches
These schools have a lot in common: They're setting
high expectations for all
students, and they don't waver
on that.
It may be an arrangement that factors out different aspects of the school's common life to the reign of each model of excellent schooling: the research university model may reign
for faculty,
for example, or
for faculty in certain fields (say, church history, or biblical studies) but not in others (say, practical theology), while paideia reigns as the model
for students, or only
for students with a declared vocation to ordained ministry (so that other
students aspiring to graduate school are free to attempt to meet standards set by the research university model); or research university values may be celebrated in relation to the school's official «academic» program, including both classroom
expectations and the selection and rewarding of faculty, while the school's extracurricular life is shaped by commitments coming from the model provided by paideia so that,
for example, common worship is made central to their common life and a
high premium is placed
on the school being a residential community.
While
students do need
high expectations for their work and conduct, focusing
on order becomes hazardous when it overtakes the joy of experiencing God's grace.
For Yeager, the conclusion to draw from the study is not that teachers should start slapping
high -
expectations Post-its
on every piece of work they hand back to
students.
Tough recounts an experiment by David Yeager and colleagues in which teachers provided feedback to
students on their essays and then added a Post-it that said either the comments were given as feedback or the comments reflected the teacher's
high expectations for the
student.
The absence of
high - performing public schools, and the lack of emphasis
on American civics or
expectations for good citizenship, will hurt our nation's youth and will certainly handicap our Hispanic immigrant
students and their families most by impeding the assimilation process.
These teachers sustain
high expectations of all
students, especially
for those whom others may have given up
on.
If teachers of color hold
higher expectations for minority
students — stemming from their perceptions about
student ability, effort, and behavior — they might be more likely to push
students to work hard and to insist
on their best effort in all assignments.
Improvement is predicated
on having and promoting
high expectations for all the
students the school enrols and, in particular, challenging the belief that «you can't expect more of these kids».
GM: «Those
students can often achieve
high grades, perform well
on the
expectations for the year level, without a huge amount of effort.
He makes similar arguments about how efforts to improve teacher quality, instructional approaches like Success
for All, and
high -
expectation techniques practiced by educators like Jaime Escalante and Rafe Esquith are not promising models
for reform because their success is due to the selection of
students or other factors that can not be replicated
on a broader scale.
In tackling this task, Feinberg says, they «backed into» the five essential tenets of the KIPP model:
High Expectations (
for academic achievement and conduct); Choice and Commitment (KIPP
students, parents, and teachers all sign a learning pledge, promising to devote the time and effort needed to succeed); More Time (extended school day, week, and year); Power to Lead (school leaders have significant autonomy, including control over their budget, personnel, and culture); and Focus
on Results (scores
on standardized tests and other objective measures are coupled with a focus
on character development).
At the other extreme, more advanced
students often achieve
high grades
on what,
for them, are middling year - level
expectations and are not challenged or extended in their mathematics learning.
In Kelly School, which is discussed in the book, these characteristics were built through a set of interrelated organizational routines including close monitoring of each
student's academic progress, an explicit link between
students» outcomes and teachers» practices, weekly 90 - minute professional development meetings focused
on instructional improvement, and the cultivation of a formal and informal discourse emphasizing
high expectations, cultural responsiveness, and teachers» responsibility
for student learning.
The
highest - performing charters are those that that have most fully embraced a «no excuses» approach to teaching and learning; have created strong school cultures based
on explicit
expectations for both academic achievement and behavior; have an intensive focus
on literacy and numeracy as the first foundation
for academic achievement; feature a relatively heavy reliance
on direct instruction and differentiated grouping, especially in the early grades; and are increasingly focused
on comprehensive
student assessment systems.
On the importance of setting
high expectations, analysis shows
students in schools where teachers have low
expectations are 1.2 times more likely to perform poorly in mathematics, after accounting
for socioeconomic status.
The survey, released this month by MetLife Inc., found that nearly nine in 10 teachers and principals — 86 percent and 89 percent, respectively — believe that setting
high expectations for students can have a major impact
on student achievement.
Teachers and parents can feel compelled in their role to help
students fulfil their potential and work towards the
high expectations alongside the
students, rather than dictating the goals
for the
students and leaving them to achieve them
on their own.
Standards - based reform was fed by three factors: increased
expectations for learning beyond
high school, which led to a focus
on college readiness
for all; the availability of reliable and cheap measures of
student proficiency in reading and math; and the push
for teacher and school accountability.
Based
on my observations, the lives of the
high school
students I teach are hemmed in everywhere by social pressures and
expectations:
high - stakes testing, the looming shadow of college admissions, the fiercely competitive school system, the painful process of figuring out who you are, and the ubiquitous desire
for peer acceptance.
The study also found that teachers,
on average, have «far lower
expectations for students who might need
high expectations and support the most.»
When the PDK / Gallup questions
on standards are put next to the Education Next findings
on the Common Core, the responses are not out of alignment, Peterson said: People are generally in favor of setting
higher expectations for students across states but they also want local teachers to have leeway in how those goals are met.
High expectations for students with unique needs An important case being heard by the U.S. Supreme Court
on Jan 11, Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, is being supported by civil rights groups and school choice advocates alike.
The second wave of reform took the form of school restructuring, and combined three complementary elements: (a) a call
for higher and common
expectations for ALL
students, (b) an emphasis
on new and more challenging teaching practices, and (c) dramatic changes in the organization and management of public schools (Elmore, 1990).
Focusing the schools» and teachers» attention
on goals and
expectations for instruction and
student achievement is part of Building a shared vision, Fostering acceptance of group goals, and Creating
high performance
expectations.
KIPP schools have clearly defined and measurable
high expectations for academic achievement and conduct that make no excuses based
on the background of
students.
McAdam wrote that Taos Charter offers accelerated learning opportunities
for advanced
students, and the school culture is based
on «playfulness, hard work and
high expectations.»
If Indiana leaves the Common Core initiative, the state's colleges and universities would have to sign off
on the new
expectations, certifying they would prepare
students for higher education.
«When we look
for greatness in our schools, we also look
for evidence of
high expectations for all
students, a commitment to social - emotional learning and to a safe and healthy school climate, and a commitment to personalized instruction — giving
students the opportunity to learn based
on the unique interests and skills.
Co-authored by
High Expectations Parental Service and the Partnership
for Children & Youth, this first chapter of «
Student Supports: Getting the Most out of Your LCFF Investment» dives into the most impactful practices
for family engagement and how they can help support progress
on the LCFF priorities.
An experienced special educator, CT3 associate Carrie Lupoli has provided insight
on how to hold
high expectations for ALL
students.
For example, positive effects on reading achievement have been associated with collaboration and community building (Briggs & Thomas, 1997); targeted professional development (Frazee, 1996); curriculum and assessment alignment (Stringfield, Millsap, & Herman, 1997); clear and agreed - upon goals and objectives at the state and school levels (Rossi & Stringfield, 1997); high expectations for students (Foertsch, 1998); early interventions and strategies for struggling readers (Lein, Johnson, & Ragland, 1997; Legters & McDill, 1994); common planning time for teachers (Miles & Darling - Hammond, 1997); and strong school leadership (George, Grissom, & Just, 1996; Shields, Knapp, & Wechsler, 199
For example, positive effects
on reading achievement have been associated with collaboration and community building (Briggs & Thomas, 1997); targeted professional development (Frazee, 1996); curriculum and assessment alignment (Stringfield, Millsap, & Herman, 1997); clear and agreed - upon goals and objectives at the state and school levels (Rossi & Stringfield, 1997);
high expectations for students (Foertsch, 1998); early interventions and strategies for struggling readers (Lein, Johnson, & Ragland, 1997; Legters & McDill, 1994); common planning time for teachers (Miles & Darling - Hammond, 1997); and strong school leadership (George, Grissom, & Just, 1996; Shields, Knapp, & Wechsler, 199
for students (Foertsch, 1998); early interventions and strategies
for struggling readers (Lein, Johnson, & Ragland, 1997; Legters & McDill, 1994); common planning time for teachers (Miles & Darling - Hammond, 1997); and strong school leadership (George, Grissom, & Just, 1996; Shields, Knapp, & Wechsler, 199
for struggling readers (Lein, Johnson, & Ragland, 1997; Legters & McDill, 1994); common planning time
for teachers (Miles & Darling - Hammond, 1997); and strong school leadership (George, Grissom, & Just, 1996; Shields, Knapp, & Wechsler, 199
for teachers (Miles & Darling - Hammond, 1997); and strong school leadership (George, Grissom, & Just, 1996; Shields, Knapp, & Wechsler, 1995).
Research behind VAL - ED (the Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education tool to assess principal performance, developed by researchers at Vanderbilt University) suggests that there are six key steps - or «processes» - that the effective principal takes when carrying out his or her most important leadership responsibilities: planning, implementing, supporting, advocating, communicating and monitoring.40 The school leader pressing
for high academic standards would,
for example, map out rigorous targets
for improvements in learning (planning), get the faculty
on board to do what's necessary to meet those targets (implementing), encourage
students and teachers in meeting the goals (supporting), challenge low
expectations and low district funding
for students with special needs (advocating), make sure families are aware of the learning goals (communicating), and keep
on top of test results (monitoring).41
Woven into this highly personal narrative about a boy's journey from silent sidekick to hero are themes that translate to public education: the challenges of finding the right school or instructional method to meet a
student's individual needs; the impact of social stigmas
on expectations and performance, particularly
for «discarded
students» in low - income neighborhoods, and the need
for a culture of
high expectations to counter those negative societal assumptions; the importance of tireless, focused, caring teachers who do whatever it takes to help
students succeed; and the ability
for all children — regardless of learning challenges or race or income level — to learn.
In this A Word conversation, he defends the importance of setting
high expectations for all
students, measuring to make sure that
students are
on track, and preparing educators with actions and interventions designed to support the success of all children.
This publication builds
on the 2015 Professional Standards
for Educational Leaders, which aim to ensure district and school leaders are able to improve
student achievement and meet new,
higher expectations.
In these schools, the crisis has been overcome, because the educators sought to control what they could, held
high expectations for student learning, and supported their
students in surmounting the debilitating effects of poverty
on learning.
He told parents and
students they were more responsible than anyone
for student success, which hinges
on high expectations and follow - through.
It is built
on a foundation of rigorous standards and
high expectations for each
student, with an intentional focus
on low - performing
students and closing achievement gaps through many inclusive strategies.
In this age of federal mandates
for high - stakes assessment and accountability, educators need easily accessed data that will help them predict if all
students are
on - track to meet grade level
expectations.
KIPP schools have clearly - defined and measurable
high expectations for academic achievement and conduct that make no excuses based
on the
students» backgrounds.
Schools where ALL children successfully learn share certain key characteristics that have come to be known as the Correlates of Effective Schools: a Clear & Focused Mission, a Safe & Orderly Environment,
High Expectations for Success, Opportunity to Learn / Time
on Task, Positive Home - School Relations, Frequent Monitoring of
Student Progress, and Strong Instructional Leadership.
The work began with teams from City - As - School, Voyages Preparatory
High School, and ELLIS Preparatory Academy exploring research - based feedback practices — such as one -
on - one conferencing and using
student - facing rubrics to set
expectations for learning — during after - school PLC sessions facilitated by Eskolta.
This school maintains a culture of
high academic
expectations and focuses
on continuous improvement by defining measurable goals
for all of its
students.
We help schools develop strong feedback and assessment processes
for students to transparently and frequently reflect
on their own progress and set goals against
high expectations for learning.
We applaud the National Center
on Educational Outcomes
for providing these very real examples of districts that, despite widely varying demographics and economic situations, have demonstrated that it is possible to improve achievement
for all
students, including those identified as
students with disabilities, when professionals set
high expectations and work together to reach them.
As a member of the task force, I am excited
for the opportunity to join my colleagues in making recommendations to craft a new structure to improve California's education system focused
on inclusive education practices,
high expectations for students and education leaders, and providing evidence - based instruction and learning supports so that all
students have an opportunity to learn the standards in all core subject areas, which will ultimately lead to increased accountability and academic success
for all.
Having a clear set of
expectations alongside data
on exactly how each
student is progressing towards each
expectation allows
for very
high resolution identification of where the
student needs help.
Teachers of color have a particularly positive effect
on students of color: They have been found to hold
higher expectations for students of color and to be both more likely to refer
students of color into gifted and talented programs and less likely to refer them
for suspension and special education (Ford, 2010; Grissom & Redding, 2016).