The process and materials tap into Olivas» desires to inform
himself on the history and tradition of the quinceañera process, how it speaks to the ongoing progression or regression of gender roles, and the myth of machismo.
The mirror effects of the black and white series Flowers in the mirror and the Moon in the water, the installation 1000 Chinese strangers — which consists of nearly one thousand photo booth portraits of Chinese workers at the time of Mao (1949 - 70)-- and the series of old image montages Where have all the flowers gone testify to the artist's reflections
on history and tradition.
Macdonald's reflections
on the history and tradition of falconry (largely a male endeavor) round out the narrative.
While in Los Angeles, Trouton presented a series of mixed media works on canvas based
on the history and traditions of women in Northern Ireland.
Not exact matches
University of Notre Dame students become part of a storied
history, where carrying
on school
traditions is a built - in part of the experience: Pep rallies, homemade - boat races,
and masses at chapel are among the activities available during students» four years
on campus.
Wood rightly devotes much attention to nineteenth - century speculation about racial origins, which rested
on the Scottish Enlightenment's «conjectural
history»; yet Henry Home, Lord Kames, a key figure in the
tradition on which Wood focuses,
and hardly an obscure one, appears here as «Lord Henry Homer Kames»
and «Lord Henry Holmer Kames.»
I find that most of my Christian friends who talk about homosexuality are either determined to not think about the issue because of
tradition and fear or are
on the other end
and choose not to think about the issue because the pressure of contemporary culture (in our part of the world) is to equate my sexuality with the colour of my skin which is, in light of
history, a silly equation but we should just adjust our understanding to accomodate.
Similarly, those who build
on traditions typically do so by adjusting traditional teachings to new findings in
history and the sciences.
The confusion
on the Assembly floor in Vancouver reflected the fact that Christians have not been enabled to think theologically about the religious faith of their neighbors, as believing
and praying (or meditating) people with a spiritual
history and tradition of their own.
In this pioneer form - critical work the first attempt was made to write a
history of the synoptic
tradition and to isolate the influences at work in
and on that
tradition as it changed
and developed.
I have a theory that SBNRs are so because one or more or a combination of the following: (1) they can't justify their spiritual texts -
and so they try to remove themselves from gory genocidal tales, misogyny
and anecdotal professions of a man / god, (2) can't defend
and are turned off by organized religious
history (which encompasses the overwhelming majority of spiritual experiences)- which is simply rife with cruelty, criminal behavior
and even modern day cruel - ignorant ostracization, (3) are unable to separate ethics from their respective religious moral code - they, like many theists
on this board, wouldn't know how to think ethically because they think the genesis of morality resides in their respective spiritual guides /
traditions and (4) are unable to separate from the communal (social) benefits of their respective religion (many atheists aren't either).
Furthermore, Ogden recognizes that there is a definite historical connection between the Christian
tradition on the one hand,
and existentialism
and process philosophy
on the other.57 Would one not have to say that both of these forms of philosophy became possibilities in fact only as a result of the emergence of Christian faith in
history,
and of the particular direction the theological
tradition developed?
Unlike the authors of Habits, who give the impression that individualism simply leaves people without communities of memory, MacIntyre correctly perceives that everyone lives within these communities, if only because our personal narratives always depend
on a sense of
history and tradition.
All I am saying, is that historically the church, like most churches, have an infinitely longer
tradition, goal
and history of positive spiritual guidance
and positive impacts
on the world than they have negative.
Insisting
on the cultural importance of «stigmatized knowledge,» he looks at the
history of this
tradition, going back to the Order of Illuminists founded in 1776 by Bavarian law professor Adam Weishaupt to free mankind «from all established religious
and political authority.»
[50] Christian theology of religions,
on the other hand, «studies the various
traditions in the context of the
history of salvation
and in their relationship to the mystery of Jesus Christ
and the Christian Church.»
...
and will use anything we can get our hands
on to justify them: little pieces of scripture,
history, guilt,
tradition, privilege, money, politics,...
He also displays a passion for social justice (which he explores in reflections
on Birmingham, Alabama)
and a deep respect for the wide sweep of Christian
history and traditions.
Any society in
history will need structures which balance enhancement of freedom
and self - determination with checks
on it by long - established legal
and moral
traditions of keeping power in the service of order
and mutual responsibility, as well as creation of new structures of public morality.
First, a little
history: In the 16th century Protestant
and Catholic positions
on justification became polarized
and soon escalated to include other doctrines, including the authority of the church; scripture
and tradition; good works; merit
and indulgences; the mass;
and sin
and its effects in human life.
While most intellectual historians agree in ranking Russell among the giants of this century,
and even accord him a place of honor in the entire 2500 - year
history of the Western philosophical
tradition, the judgment is still not in
on Whitehead's role
and place in that
history.
Flat, blank facades
on buildings conceived as commodities — or just oddities — rather than works of civic art; flat modernist pictorial abstractions; the flattening of cultural
history into pseudo-
history packaged as what Henry dismissed as «applied sociology» — all spoke to him of something far more ominous, the abasement of man
and the crude negation of his proper relationship to nature as embodied in the great
tradition.
On the other hand, Hartshorne's approach to the
history of philosophy was less a
history of
traditions and persons than a
history of ideas.
Gerber named its 2018 Spokesbaby
on Wednesday
and aside from maintaining the long - standing
tradition of being adorable, Lucas Warren is also making
history for being the first spokesbaby with Down syndrome.
My undergraduate degree is in religion, with a focus
on the
history of Christian theology, so I'm probably more aware than most people how things that were never in the Bible became
tradition,
and then became dogma.
Higher criticism includes an analysis of the literary genre of the text, its historical background, the
history of the oral
tradition behind the text,
and the cultural
and psychological factors at work
on the author
and editor (or editors) of the text.
In a well - told sketch of our economic
and political
history, Levin outlines the ways in which our progressive
tradition responded to the fragmentation brought
on by rapid industrialization
and mass immigration in the late nineteenth century.
Christianity is based not simply
on experience,
tradition, inherited wisdom,
and reason, but
on God's self - disclosure in
history.
It was, as a matter of fact, the impact of the Judaeo - Christian
tradition on Western civilization that is chiefly responsible for the awareness so prevalent among us today that
history presses forward toward novel achievements, that the future is open
and full of promise, that man is a free creature whose own decisions
and deeds enter into the shaping of tomorrow's world.
I've been doing a lot of reading
on church
history recently (for that book I'm writing... Close Your Church for Good),
and it constantly amazes me how much of what we do «in church» is a result of
tradition (so much for Sola Scriptura) which developed 1000 - 1500 years ago as a result of a politician or priest who wanted more power or more money.
Writing of men in an old section of the South that he knew so well Wolfe writes: «He is not a colonist, a settler, a transplanted European; during his three centuries there in the wilderness he has become native to the immense
and lonely land that he inhabits; during those three centuries he has taken
on the sinew
and the color of that earth, he has acquired a character, a
tradition, a
history of his own..
He holds simultaneously that existing democratic ideas,
traditions,
and institutions were often championed in actual
history by those who were non-Christians or even anti-Christian;
and yet that, in building better than they knew, such persons were often generating in human temporal life constructs whose foundations were not only consistent with Jewish
and Christian convictions about the realities of ethical
and political life, but in a sense dependent
on them.
We can appeal to the work of Bultmann
and Jeremias
on the
history of the
tradition; we can appeal to the recent work
on the theology of the synoptic evangelists
and their
tradition;
and, as we shall see in our work below, the acceptance of this hypothesis as a working hypothesis is validated over
and over again by the results achieved in individual instances.
On the other hand, if you do not accept these qualities of
history and are free to transcend the limitations of
tradition and disregard the counsels of ancient wisdom, your social inventiveness is limited, if it is limited at all, by nothing but elemental common sense
and common prudence.
In regard to the actual formulation of the criterion we have attempted, it should be noted that we are still insisting
on the importance of establishing a
history of the
tradition and of restricting ourselves to the earliest stratum of that
tradition; in our view, material dependent upon other material already present in the
tradition is necessarily a product of the Church.
In our earlier mention of the work of Jeremias
on the parables we pointed out that one of the reasons for its success is that he achieves a
history of the parabolic
tradition; he is able to show how the parabolic
tradition reached its present form
and what that
tradition was like in its earlier
and earliest forms.
None of us are so untouched by the biblical stories of God's self - disclosure that our understandings of mystery, nature,
history,
and self are innocent of the interpretations provided of them by the impact of biblical faith
and doctrinal
traditions on our culture
and language.
«Perhaps some people think the nonviolent
tradition exists only among folks who wear Gandhi buttons
on their lapels
and have some
history with the Left; they don't think a bunch of white - bread eaters with Bible College bumper stickers could be «real» satyagrahis.
All the great literate
traditions have taken certain books as formative of their deepest beliefs
and have read them, commented
on them,
and understood them in changing ways over their entire
history.
«47
And third, it is through this work of reinterpreting its own
traditions that Israel as a community develops a historical consciousness, thereby becoming a historical reality, if it is true, as critical scholarship suggests, that Israel did not exist as a unified entity until the amphictyonic period after the settlement of Canaan, then we can say that «by elaborating this
history as a living
tradition, Israel projected itself into the past as a single people, to whom occurred, as to an indivisible totality, the deliverance from Egypt, the revelation
on Sinai, the wandering in the desert, the gift of the Promised Land.
A theology of interfaith cooperation lives honestly alongside your theology of salvation
and evangelism, but also asks what in your Christian faith — your relationships to Jesus, your understanding of the Bible, your knowledge of Christian
history and tradition — speaks to why you might work together with people of other faiths
on issues of common concern.
My own sense is that the true vitality lies with congregations that are able to take the contemporary interest in spiritual life
and growth seriously
and yet are able to draw
on the riches of Christian
tradition and history to do so.
However, we also need to note here that according to certain
traditions existing in India, St. Thomas,
on his way to India, embarked at Basra, (William Yong, Handbook of Source Materials for Students of Church
History Madras, The Senate of Serampore College
and C.L.S, 1969, pp 26 - 27.)
Past
history is for him something dead
and done with, something which does not vitally affect us, something which exists only in the memory, which is dependent
on tradition and all its hazards,
and which is therefore subject to criticism
and essentially relative.
Christians,
on the whole, have little sense of
history and are unaware of the sources of the
tradition from which they come.
He, more than anyone else in Christian
history, dug back very deep into the Old Testament Sabbath day
tradition with all of its restrictions, its admonitions to rest,
and, taking them out of the Jewish
tradition, he dropped them down
on the Christian Sunday.
History based
on a social - kerygmatic interpretation of data covers the early
and mid-20th-century methods known by the Germanic phrases «form criticism,» «
tradition criticism»
and «redaction criticism.»
The justification of that interpretation is that it makes sense of the
traditions about him, that it is true to the living experience of his presence
and power, that it illuminates the whole field of
history,
and that it throws light
on all nature
and life.
When the Anglican patristic scholar
and Church historian Trevor Jalland concluded his Bampton Lectures at Oxford in 1942 (published in 1944 as The Church
and the Papacy: A Historical Study), he spoke of the Roman Church as having «in its long
and remarkable
history a supernatural grandeur which no mere secular institution has ever attained in equal measure,»
and went
on to refer to «its strange, almost mystical, faithfulness to type, its marked degree of changelessness, its steadfast clinging to
tradition and to precedent.»
We believe that changing the club's name will break with 109 years of
history and tradition and are calling for proper consultation with supporters
on any change to the club's identity.