They have made themselves especially visible by leading the attack
on homosexual activity.
My question is: Shouldn't the preachers» brainstorming
on homosexual activity in more and more disrespectful details be considered as perversion and a sin?
Not exact matches
Father Reese writes
on Newsweek «s On Faith blog, «The Catholic hierarchy does not support ecclesial or state - sponsored homosexual marriage and still argues that sex outside of marriage, including homosexual activity, is sinful.&raqu
on Newsweek «s
On Faith blog, «The Catholic hierarchy does not support ecclesial or state - sponsored homosexual marriage and still argues that sex outside of marriage, including homosexual activity, is sinful.&raqu
On Faith blog, «The Catholic hierarchy does not support ecclesial or state - sponsored
homosexual marriage and still argues that sex outside of marriage, including
homosexual activity, is sinful.»
On one end is the noncompromising «sin perspective» summarized in these words from an article in a conservative periodical: «The New Testament blasts
homosexual activity as the lowest, most degraded kind of immorality» (Alliance Witness, July i6, 1975).
You have thus far completely refused all questions given to you in attempts to discuss the issue, have made absolutely zero effort to prove your assertion that
homosexual activity is sinful, and have chosen instead to fall back
on theatrical bravado.
They estimated a «human freedom index» for each country based
on 1985 figures for forty different indicators among them the right to travel, freedom of religion, freedom from unlawful detention, independent press,
homosexual activities between consenting adults.
In 1973 the American Bar Association called
on state legislatures to repeal all laws which place
homosexual activity between consenting adults in private in the category of a crime.
In booklets such as An Evangelical Look at Homosexuality (1977, revised) and Holier - Than - Thou Hocus - Pocus & Homosexuality (1977), Blair asserts that the Bible does not offer judgment
on loving, monogamous
homosexual activity between exclusive
homosexuals (those with no heterosexual propensity).
This understanding has developed from scattered reading
on the topic and personal acquaintance both with those who condemn all
homosexual activity and those who are attracted primarily to members of the same sex.
But if that's so, he notes, then it should govern the way Christians think about same - sex sexual
activity as well, and thus he concludes: «When those with
homosexual orientation act
on their desires in a loving, committed relationship, [they] are not, as far as I can see, violating the love command.»
The gay campaigner Peter Tatchell, for example, predictably praised the Bishop of Killaloe for calling
on the Church to drop its objection to
homosexual activity, along with other moral teachings.
It is not my intention here to recommend any single perspective
on premarital, extramarital,
homosexual and other forms of sexual
activity.
The church clings to its condemnation of any
homosexual activity, justifying itself by means of dubious Biblical warrants of a sort it would be ashamed to use
on other issues.
When Rick Jones, an ordained minister and former cop, heard his boss talking about another minister's
homosexual activity with an employee, he «got up and walked away,» the Los Angeles Times reported
on its front page yesterday.
The etymology of the word «teabagging» involves a slang term originating in American
homosexual subculture (ref - NSFW) involving a specific (typically humiliating based
on context) sexual
activity between two
homosexual males.
Heterosexual men, as well as
homosexual men and women, became aroused while viewing attractive members of their preferred sex engaged in nonsexual
activities, such as walking
on a beach.
Bisexual relationships basically involve both
homosexual as well as heterosexual
activities on bisexual dating site.