Sentences with phrase «on human animal»

We started the day with a meeting of the deans from 16 veterinarian schools around the U.S., who explained what HABRI is about and how they can support the program through much of the research each one is involved with centering on human animal interaction.

Joe teaches and speaks nationally and internationally on human animal bond and partners with animals in his medical practice.

In 2010, leaders from the American Pet Products Association (APPA), Pfizer Animal Health (now Zoetis) and Petco identified the need for a comprehensive organization that could support multi-disciplinary research on the human animal bond.

The Human Animal Bond Research Institute (HABRI) and North American Veterinary Community (NAVC) have jointly developed a new certification program on the human animal bond.

Some of the scientific research in this area, presented to over 800 delegates at the Eighth International Conference on Human Animal Interactions, included for example:

She had a leading role as a founder and chair of the division on Human Animal Mutualism of the International Association of Animal Behavior Consultants (IAABC), which is focused on working animals.

Not exact matches

Rice and I were discussing the effects of technology on human health and how it has certainly helped — but what about animals?

The US Food and Drug Administration issued a «preliminary finding» that the genetically modified insects, produced by Oxitec at its labs in Oxford, England, and shipped as eggs to Florida, would have essentially «no significant impact» on human health, animal health, or the ecosystem.

The lengthy research cited on HVMN's website and others are primarily animal studies, rather than human studies, and primarily test one of two compounds in combination, rather than the half - dozen contained in a product like SPRINT.

Humans are story - processing animals, and we at Inc. hope a story like Mitra's resonates on many levels.

If humans have any hope of living forever, we should probably take a hint from the dozens of other animals on Earth that far outpace our measly 71 years.

By printing multiple lung airways — or any other afflicted organ — from a human patient and testing drugs on them, pharma companies can bypass the ethically challenged practice of testing on animals and proceed to human clinical trials with greater confidence the drugs will actually work, according to Wadsworth.

While there's hardly any research yet on the hormone in human dads, findings elsewhere in the animal kingdom are strong and suggestive that it works in a similar way in people.

«The Red Triangle includes roughly 200 miles of coastline.But it's not the beachgoers and surfers that attract great whites to these waters.It's the rich population of other mammals like elephant seals, harbor seals, sea lions, and sea otters.Great whites prefer to prey on these animals instead of humans.

John Eppig, a reproductive biologist at Jackson Laboratory in Bar Harbor, Maine raised the concern that no animal studies with a control group have been done — a standard practice with experimental medical procedures — yet somehow the procedure is being tried on humans.

An increasing number of biotech firms are focusing on bringing «human - like» therapies to the animal world.

By the end of the book, Animal Farm has been renamed Manor Farm and the ruling pigs are walking on two legs like the humans they overthrew.

Unless Congress acts on a new plan that would subject anyone who kills those animals for human consumption to a jail term and up to a $ 2,500 fine.

It's human nature to zero in on threats: evolution wired us to worry about the animals that want to eat us.»

Prior to launching Pillar, Cindy worked on searches for a number of high profile clients including Santa Barbara International Film Festival, Emeril Lagasse Foundation, U.S. Naval War College, Nantucket Athenaeum, Kellogg School of Management, Institute of Human Virology, Los Angeles Philharmonic, and World Animal Protection.

«Animal spirits» thus refers to the tendency to for investment prices to rise and fall based on human emotion rather than intrinsic value.

Why did he pick humans, the most curious animal on earth, to submit to temptation?

The Bible explicitly states that every other human and animal on the planet are killed.

The logic of concern for animal welfare and the logic of concern for human animal welfare operate on parallel tracks.

That did not happen: there is no geological record of a world - wide flood, there is not enough diversity to regenerate the population we currently, there is not enough water to cover the earth to the height of Everest, the logistics of retrieving and returning animals to the then - unknown Americas, Australia, etc. were staggeringly difficult, managing the animals on the Ark was impossible — a few humans keeping predators from their prey, cleaning the waste, etc., pretty much all life on earth would have been killed, etc. etc..

I want my planet back with the original animals but no humans... that was the deal and you are already overdue on delivering your armageddon.

We can assume that all the Justices sitting on the Court today, like other humans, have their own preferences and biases about religion, but the judicial opinions of one of them, Justice John Paul Stevens, raise more than a slight suspicion that some of his actions on the bench stem from animosity, if not to animal sacrifice, at least to certain less exotic religious beliefs and practices.

Human life, animals, plants — His Creations — are of value, not some paper with writing on it.

ian... not sure which part you wanted me to reply on, but I will take issue with yr point about homosexuality being a threat to human existence.I'm no expert on the subject, but I think we cd safely assume that the phenomena has been with us since our ancestors came out of the trees... we're now over six billion and growing at an alarming rate.Not sure where you might find the data on this supposed threat to going forth and multiplying.BTW, I have read that homosexual behaviour is observable in the animal kingdom, but I wd need to do some work to reference a credible study.

Like the other animals, humans «bring forth... according to their kind» and, in more peculiarly human fashion, pass on to children their image and likeness (Gen. 1:24; 5:3).

i guess you could point to the great flood where he murdered EVERYthing on earth, humans, animals and plants, except one family and their zoo.

If god created all the organisms on the planet, then He must have created even the germs that have caused and are causing so much death and suffering for humans and animals.

It is customary and even ethically mandatory that experimentation that carries with it a substantial degree of risk to human subjects first be tested in an animal laboratory or, at the very least, on a computer model.

Now he reviews a new book on ethics and writes,» [The author] agrees with what now seems to be a near - consensus among philosophers that «speciesism» - the view that we are entitled to take theinterests of animals less seriously than we take human interests, simply because humans are members of our species - is not a morally defensible position.»

Daily Telegraph May 7th 2007 Chief contributor: Lisa Gregoire OF EVANGELICAL INTEREST • Radio Four's Sundayprogramme on 20th May last hosted a discussion on the government's «U-turn» in favour of the creation of human - animal hybrid embryos for medical research.

Our emotions are connected to the magnetic field, creatures are affected and connect to it and rely on it for survival, and animals can often sense human emotions based on this same connection.

This is, obviously, based on a dualistic view of the relation between human beings and animals.

Ernst Cassirer in his Essay on Man designates man as «animal symbolicum,» and shows that all of the typically human functions stem from this fundamental ability to formulate and communicate meanings.

You can not compare the evolutionary «moral» instincts of animals, which do what they do just to survive... to the human sense of innate morality, which is not necessarily based on survival.

Princeton bioethicist Peter Singer popularized «speciesism,» a derogatory term for the belief that it is acceptable to treat humans differently from animals based solely on species membership.

It may help if we consider the sexual instinct on two levels: the animal and the properly human.

If, on the other hand, the human mind belongs to a rational animal, whose being is contingent, all its arguments are laced through and through with contingency; they can not prove necessarily.

They share some useful thoughts on a range of issues, in particular regarding human uniqueness in comparison with other animals, and the neuroscience of religiousness.

Indeed, the animal rights movement's fury against the speciesist use of animals» a necessary element for human flourishing, particularly in medical research» has increased to the point that scientists are now under threat of death by the most radical liberationists for daring to experiment on rats or monkeys to find cures for cancer and other human afflictions.

If god created all the organisms on the planet, then He must have created even the diseases that have caused and are causing so much death and misery for humans and animals.

Much of the discussion of the first directive has concentrated on the issue of non-violence, but it also says that «the lives of animals and plants... deserve protection, preservation and care».18 The church's record on this issue has been subject to criticism, and certainly modern European society has tended to exploit the natural world and to emphasize the gap between human and other forms of life.

Any scientist on earth knows that the overwhelming body of evidence points towards h om os exu ality, hete ros exuality, and bis exu ality as normally occurring phenomenon within the spectrum of innate human (and hundreds of other animals) se x ual development.

I do also recognize a hierarchy of living beings in that I regard human life as more valuable than animal life and would not oppose essential medical experiments on animals, although I am not persuaded that all experiments are essential.

When the image of God entered into the species which is humankind, that species was ordained to find its order on a plane other than the animal, and because of the presence of that divine image, dominance on the human plane is not a natural order but a disorder.

Regarding the latter, classical theologians typically limit self - determining (free) creatures on this earth to humans (Or perhaps also to certain higher animals), 1 while process theologians typically would affirm that creative self - determination is characteristic of all beings.