In 2004, this editorial page backed Proposition 71, a $ 3 billion ballot measure meant to bypass then - President George W. Bush's ban
on human embryonic stem cell research and to put California in the forefront of this hugely promising field.
The bill was put forth to loosen the restrictions Bush placed
on human embryonic stem cell research on August 9, 2001, when he banned federal funding for work with any stem cell line created after that date.
The vote will have little direct impact
on human embryonic stem cell research, but the potential threat to reproductive technology and abortion rights is more immediate
Not exact matches
research; since most of the reports have concentrated
on justifying the creation of cloned
human embryos for
research into and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's, «
stem -
cells» has become synonymous with «
embryonic stem -
cells» in the public imagination.
Well it seems like Ivan can relax, Michael Peroski has just solved all of our problems: Proceeding from ideology - driven inquiry entails starting from an answer: «
Research on human embryonic stem cell should be forbidden because embryos are equivalent to
human lives» and working....
In August of last year, President Bush approved the use of federal funds to support
research on a limited number of existing
human embryonic stem cell lines.
Unfortunately, at this formative stage in their lives one viewpoint is pushed to the fore
on campus, and that's the opinion that euthanasia, abortion,
embryonic stem cell research and a host of other practices which strip
humans of their most fundamental right are good things.
On March 9, AAAS thanked President Obama for his executive order on federal support for human embryonic stem cell research and for his memorandum on scientific integrit
On March 9, AAAS thanked President Obama for his executive order
on federal support for human embryonic stem cell research and for his memorandum on scientific integrit
on federal support for
human embryonic stem cell research and for his memorandum
on scientific integrit
on scientific integrity.
Faced with an often - hostile Congress, Obama enacted many of his signature policies by executive order — from reversing restrictions
on research with
human embryonic stem cells to helping communities prepare for climate change.
In granting an injunction to two scientists who oppose widening US government funding for
research on human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), Judge Royce Lamberth wrote of «simply preserving the status quo».
Congressional supporters of
stem cell research have re-introduced legislation to codify President Barack Obama's 2009 executive order lifting restrictions
on the number of
human embryonic stem cell lines available to federally funded researchers.
«We thought the fight was over,» Tom Harkin (D — Iowa) and chairman of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee
on Labor, Health and
Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies said at a hearing
on embryonic stem cell research on Thursday.
Lamberth interprets that to include funding of
research on human embryonic stem cells more broadly, even though the Department of Health and Human Services and several presidential Administrations have not ag
human embryonic stem cells more broadly, even though the Department of Health and
Human Services and several presidential Administrations have not ag
Human Services and several presidential Administrations have not agreed.
Last summer, a federal court banned taxpayer - funded
research on human embryonic stem cells.
The final guidelines
on research with
human embryonic stem cells issued
on Monday by the National Institutes of Health set out criteria for determining which ES
cell lines can be used in federally funded experiments and give NIH discretion to approve old lines that don't meet stringent modern ethical requirements.
Lamberth granted a preliminary injunction
on this
research after hearing a petition from a group of advocates who argued that, contrary to the U.S. government's view,
research on embryonic stem cells does in fact destroy embryos — action that is prohibited by legislation known as the «Dickey - Wicker Amendment» to the bill that funds the Department of Health and
Human Services.
On the use of
embryonic stem cell research to cure diseases: it should be shut down because it involves «the wholesale destruction of
human life».
While conservatives in Congress took turns echoing George W. Bush's opposition to destroying
human embryos for
research, Lensch's colleague Paul Lerou stepped into a small room behind a heavy black curtain to check up
on a line of nonpresidential
embryonic stem cells.
In 2004 Blackburn and ethicist William F. May made headlines when the Bush administration ousted them from the President's Council
on Bioethics for their strong public support of
human embryonic stem cell research.
The Bundestag faces a heated debate
on 30 January, when the issue of whether to allow the import of
human embryonic stem cells for
research purposes is
on the agenda.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is scrambling to push out
research grants for work
on human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and has given a cautious all - clear to in - house
stem cell researchers after an appeals court yesterday temporarily lifted a ban
on federal funding for hESC
research.
A federal appeals court
on Tuesday granted a «stay» that allows
human embryonic stem cell (hESC)
research to continue during an appeal of a 23 August district court preliminary injunction blocking it.
In the latest twist in an increasingly complex legal struggle, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has appealed a judge's refusal
on Tuesday to remove the ban
on funding for
human embryonic stem cell (hESC)
research.
If that's the case, it is tempting to blame President George W. Bush's restrictions
on research using
human embryonic stem cells (hESCs).
As expected, the plaintiffs in a law suit claiming that federally funded
research on human embryonic stem cells (hESC) is illegal have appealed a ruling that dealt them a defeat earlier this summer.
In March, President Barack Obama lifted Bush's ban
on using federal funds for
research on human embryonic stem cells derived after August 2001.
Ruling affirms lower court decision denying challenge to federal
research on human embryonic stem cells
Lamberth, who ordered a temporary ban
on federal funding for
human embryonic stem cells research last August that an appeals court later overturned, is expected to issue a final ruling
on the matter as soon as this summer.
U.S. Supreme Court rejects petition calling for ban
on taxpayer - funded
human embryonic stem cell research
If dealing with the public relations nightmare over its
on - off -
on funding of Planned Parenthood wasn't enough, the Susan G. Komen for the Cure cancer charity last week also got entangled, somewhat bizarrely, in the debate over
human embryonic stem (ES)
cell research.
A U.S. appeals court today upheld the legality of federally funded
research on human embryonic stem cells (hESCs)-- the latest in a string of wins for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in a 3 - year legal battle with groups that for moral reasons want to block the use of these
cells.
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,
stem cell researcher Sean Morrison, an outspoken proponent of allowing
research on human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in the state, has been wooed to Texas by its $ 3 billion state cancer
research program.
In a Senate hearing today
on the ongoing legal tussle over
human embryonic stem cell (hESC)
research, lawmakers and expert witnesses lamented the disruption to this promising
research.
Meanwhile, Senators Arlen Specter (R - Pennsylvania) and Tom Harkin (D - Iowa) introduced a bill
on 5 April that would authorize NIH to fund derivation of and
research on human embryonic stem cells.
Since its inception, CIRM has sought to create a system from the ground up for funding
research on human embryonic stem cells to fill in the gaps left by federal funding restrictions (ScienceNOW, 12 April).
February 2010 - Italian
stem cell scientists challenge goverment EuroSyStem scientist Elena Cattaneo challenges Italian government - the story continues In the summer of 2009, three Italian
stem celli scientists unsuccessfully challenged their government in the courts over its decision to exclude
human embryonic stem cell research from a ministerial funding call for projects
on stem cell biology.
One form of
stem cell research is conducted
on embryonic stem cells — or those extracted from
human embryos, which are destroyed in the process.
However, when the 8 - million - Euro funding call was made public, a sentence had been introduced that explicitly excluded
research on human embryonic stem cells.
That study found that since MSCRF first began awarding grants in 2007, its pattern of giving shifted over the years from strongly favoring projects focusing
on ethically contentious
human embryonic stem cell research (hESCR) to projects focusing
on ethically non-contentious adult
stem cells and other non-
embryonic stem cell research.
Collins warned of a «cloud hanging over this field,» of top US scientists potentially being driven into other disciplines or other countries, and of «severe collateral damage» to the burgeoning field of induced pluripotent
stem cell research, which, he argued, relies
on human embryonic stem cells as a «gold standard» comparator.
Yamanaka believed that
research that inherently depended
on the routine destruction of
human embryonic life could not continue and another way to obtain pluripotent
stem cells had to be found.
Daley, the associate director of the
stem cell programme at Children's Hospital Boston, decried his opponents» portrayal of
human embryonic stem cell research as replaceable with adult
stem cell research or work
on induced pluripotent
cells.
Specter
on Monday introduced a bill that affirmatively states that it is legal for the government to fund
human embryonic stem cell research — a bill highly similar to the one introduced in the House in March by Diana DeGette (Democrat, Colorado), with one important extra: Specter's bill states that the government should fund the
research «notwithstanding any other provision of law, including [the Dickey - Wicker amendment].»
This work is highly relevant to the issues of
human reproductive cloning and
research on human embryonic stem cells.
The backgrounder below provides summary main points and sources
on the position of current NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins in support of
human embryonic stem cell research,
human cloning, and the creation of ethically - questionable
human - animal chimeras.
A new study confirms a seemingly obvious assumption about
human embryonic stem cell research: Countries with fewer restrictions
on research outperform countries with more restrictions.
«This discovery will advance our understanding of
stem cell epigenetics and chromatin structures, provide potential mechanisms
on maintaining the hallmark properties of ES
cells, and help researchers with the rich source of information to better understand some of the unique features — such as self - renewal and pluripotency — of
human embryonic stem cells,» said Ng Huck Hui, Ph.D., senior group leader at GIS and a member of the Singapore team that conducted this
research.
Researchers from I -
Stem participate regularly in discussions on the ethical reflection on scientific and medical perspectives of research on human embryonic stem ce
Stem participate regularly in discussions
on the ethical reflection
on scientific and medical perspectives of
research on human embryonic stem ce
stem cells.
Ms. Roxland concurrently served as the Special Advisor to the Commissioner of Health
on Stem Cell Research Ethics, where she spearheaded creation of state - wide rules on embryonic stem cell protocols, human - animal chimera research, compensation of women who donate their oocytes to stem cell research, informed consent processes, re-contact for return of research results and incidental findings, and downstream uses of biological samp
Stem Cell Research Ethics, where she spearheaded creation of state - wide rules on embryonic stem cell protocols, human - animal chimera research, compensation of women who donate their oocytes to stem cell research, informed consent processes, re-contact for return of research results and incidental findings, and downstream uses of biological samp
Cell Research Ethics, where she spearheaded creation of state - wide rules on embryonic stem cell protocols, human - animal chimera research, compensation of women who donate their oocytes to stem cell research, informed consent processes, re-contact for return of research results and incidental findings, and downstream uses of biological
Research Ethics, where she spearheaded creation of state - wide rules
on embryonic stem cell protocols, human - animal chimera research, compensation of women who donate their oocytes to stem cell research, informed consent processes, re-contact for return of research results and incidental findings, and downstream uses of biological samp
stem cell protocols, human - animal chimera research, compensation of women who donate their oocytes to stem cell research, informed consent processes, re-contact for return of research results and incidental findings, and downstream uses of biological samp
cell protocols,
human - animal chimera
research, compensation of women who donate their oocytes to stem cell research, informed consent processes, re-contact for return of research results and incidental findings, and downstream uses of biological
research, compensation of women who donate their oocytes to
stem cell research, informed consent processes, re-contact for return of research results and incidental findings, and downstream uses of biological samp
stem cell research, informed consent processes, re-contact for return of research results and incidental findings, and downstream uses of biological samp
cell research, informed consent processes, re-contact for return of research results and incidental findings, and downstream uses of biological
research, informed consent processes, re-contact for return of
research results and incidental findings, and downstream uses of biological
research results and incidental findings, and downstream uses of biological samples.
«Martin Pera brings an unparalleled depth of expertise in
embryonic and pluripotent
stem cell biology to our faculty, complementing and broadening our emerging
research emphasis
on human genomic medicine,» said Edison Liu, M.D., president and CEO of The Jackson Laboratory.