Sentences with phrase «on human reviewers»

Not exact matches

Google's YouTube has introduced another new approach in its on - going quest to please advertisers: human reviewers.

The streaming service has been trying to crack down on inappropriate content by hiring more human reviewers and using technology to automate the process of flagging offensive videos.

The trio named SCIgen in honor of the World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics (WMSCI), an annual event that they suspected was fraudulently claiming to use human peer reviewers to vet submissions.

The reviewer wasn't concentrating on the detail of the film, has little or no understanding of human nature and is very quick to apply inappropriate labels which cloud his reading of the film.

Some clueless reviewers have been pining for 4K 3840x2160 Smartphones, which would require almost double the pixels, memory, and processing power of the 2960x1440 display on the Galaxy S9, but there would be no visual benefit for humans!

Over the years, our reviewers have called Munro «an expert when it comes to laying bare human motives and emotions,» and an author who «can deftly zero in on a character's essence with a single, telling attribute.»

Some clueless reviewers have been pining for 4K 3840x2160 Smartphones, which would require almost double the pixels, memory, and processing power of the 2960x1440 display on the Galaxy Note8, but there would be no visual benefit for humans!

Along with being a scientific reviewer for multiple journals, he serves on the editorial review board for Veterinary Surgery and numerous other veterinary and human orthopedic journals.

One early reviewer commented on how «the series of bronze figures imparts that feeling of something more than human, the secret and self - contained power of the idol, which is of the immemorial essence in sculpture.»

The documents were posted Thursday at Stopgreensuicide.com, a Web site launched by Alec Rawls, a passionate foe of restrictions on greenhouse gases (with a very quirky pedigree) who signed up — like almost anyone could — to be one of 800 reviewers offering more than 30,000 comments on this draft report, which focuses on the basic science examining the extent of the human influence on the climate system.

A reviewer in the NYT described it as «A protracted exploration of the aesthetic, social and spiritual dimensions of industrialization and globalization... Raises some sigificant and sobering questions about the impact that we, as humans, make on our environment» As Brett Wallach noted, «The landscape is as good as a book to get you thinking.»

A reviewer in the NYT described it as «A protracted exploration of the aesthetic, social and spiritual dimensions of industrialization and globalization... raises some significant and sobering questions about the impact that we, as humans, make on our environment.»

«Fifty - three authors and five reviewers are all that can be said to explicitly support the claim of a significant human influence on climate.

Climate change skeptics claimed the IPCC 2007 report — the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC 2007), which uses scientific facts to argue humans are causing climate change — was based on an alleged bias for positive results by editors and peer reviewers of scientific journals; editors and scientists were accused of suppressing research that did not support the paradigm for carbon dioxide - induced global warming.

Justin Patten at Human Law extends congratulations to One Crown Office Row Chambers, which Internet reviewer Delia Venables recently singled out as one of the three most interesting chambers sites on the Web.

In eDiscovery, discussions about «artificial intelligence» generally focus on predictive coding — the machine learning process that reduces the time human reviewers must spend reading non-relevant information — by teaching the software to analyse periodic human feedback, learn for itself what information reviewers are actually interested in, and then locate that information.

Applied to the problem of large - scale legal document review and production, technology - assisted review enables a small number of expert human reviewers to train a computerized system to recognize the subtle differences between responsive and non-responsive documents based on the review of a small but representative sample of the document collection.

Can you eliminate the judgments of reviewers if you find they were making poor decisions to keep the system from «learning» bad things and thus making judgments based on the human errors?

Partly in response to Logan's blunder, YouTube YouTube said on Tuesday, January 16, it would start using human reviewers to assess the suitability of popular channels for Google Preferred, the elite ads program available to YouTube's top creators.

With this sort of competition, with ATS», HR staff and recruiters focusing on efficiency, and just the physiology of how humans process information, paragraphs no longer work well to present information that reviewers can «see».

Actually, in a lot of ways, formatting a resume for an ATS is easier than formatting a resume for a human reviewer because the structure is much simpler, there are fewer choices to make, and the ATS optimized resume doesn't have to fit nicely on a page the way a human - friendly resume must.

On the other hand, having too much information may give the ATS more opportunities to find keyword matches, but then it comes back to hurt you when the human reviewer has a hard time digesting the numerous pages of information.