Not exact matches
The
analysis focuses
on two
ice cores drilled in 2013 from Mount Hunter in Alaska's Denali National Park, and an older
ice core from Canada's Mount Logan.
An
analysis of CO2 preserved in
ice cores shows that for more than 600,000 years the ocean had a pH of approximately 8.2 (pH is the acidity of a solution measured
on a 14 - point scale, with a pH below 7 being acidic and above 7, basic).
The team based its
analysis on ratios of oxygen and hydrogen isotopes in
ice cores drilled in East Antarctica.
Understanding how that would affect the climate will require going beyond historical records of climate change, or even the information encoded in tree rings or
ice cores, to what scientists call «deep time» records of conditions
on Earth, according to a new NAS
analysis.
This
analysis of
ice cores relies
on the assumption that there is limited biological activity altering the environment in the snow during its transition into
ice.
Ice -
core analysis on the Siple Coast of West Antarctica.
Time will tell of course — confirming studies from
ice cores and independent
analyses are already published, with more rumoured to be
on their way.
Data
on greenhouse gas abundances going back beyond a million years, that is, beyond the reach of antarctic
ice cores, are still rather uncertain, but
analysis of geological samples suggests that the warm
ice - free periods coincide with high atmospheric CO2 levels.
Note: emissions are estimated independently of the model, based
on chemical
analysis of
ice core samples from Greenland, industrial production, etc..
Paleoclimatology estimates are based
on analyses of
ice cores and other paleo indicators that are used to estimate temperature changes and forcing changes.
This «new evidence» is based
on a single
analysis of «proxy» data (that is, data that do not come from thermometers but rather from sources like tree rings,
ice cores, corals, and ocean and lake sediments) showing the twentieth century to be the warmest in the past thousand years.
Recent
analysis of the Greenland
ice cores, by Chylek et al., has proven that the powerful AMO variability has been part and parcel of the Greenland climate for thousands of years, pushing temperatures higher and lower depending
on the cycle point.
Typical reconstructions of historic heliospheric magnetic field (HMF) BHMF are based
on the
analysis of the sunspot activity, geomagnetic data or
on measurement of cosmogenic isotopes stored in terrestrial reservoirs like trees (14C) and
ice cores (10Be).
However, both the driving force and the climate reconstructions over the pre-industrial era are based
on the
analysis of the natural archives of climate sensitive quantities, such as the growth of trees and seashells, and the changes of chemical, biological, and isotopic compositions in lake sediments and
ice core samples.
My immediately following (and more detailed)
analyses of Wegman et al's sections
on tree rings, as well as
ice cores and coral proxies (also largely copied from Bradley's text book) eventually came to Bradley's attention, apparently via Richard Littlemore at Desmogblog.
The problem with your
analysis is that the
ice cores already reflect the ocean temperature by measuring the ratio of Deuterium to Hydrogen based
on the difference in the relative evaporation of each, vs. temperature.
In such case for proper scientific
analysis it is better to rely
on good quality data where available and proxy data for historical reconstructions — like for instance satellite data &
ice core data.
Wenk Physics Institute, University of Bern, CH — 3012 Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, Switzerland Studies
on air trapped in old polar
ice1, 2 have shown that during the last
ice age, the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration was probably significantly lower than during the Holocene — about 200 p.p.m. rather than 270 p.p.m.. Also, Stauffer et al. 3 recently showed by detailed
analyses of Greenland
ice cores, that during the
ice age, between about 30,000 and 40,000 yr BP, the atmospheric CO2 level probably varied between 200 and 260 p.p.m..
Hansen's climate
analyses have been based not only
on the very basic physics that goes into climate model design, but
on the detailed studies of the geological
ice core and isotope records that are used to constrain and confirm climate model sensitivity.
Two comprehensive chapters
on dating methods provide the foundation for all paleoclimatic studies and are followed by up - to - date coverage of
ice core research, continental geological and biological records, pollen
analysis, radiocarbon dating, tree rings and historical records.
With regard to proxy studies, same basic questions, are these direct or passive correlations, what evidence that tree ring
core thickness depends only
on temperature (what about precipitation, cloud cover, volcanic activity, sea surface temperatue changes, sea current changes, solar irradiance changes, cloud cover, etc.) How are these variables accounted for when
analysis of
ice cores is completed, or for that matter when computer models, and / or proxy studies are completed.
The point of this remark is that no one up to present date has conducted any
analysis of this sort
on the
ice core data, therefore my assertion that currently «you have no data of adequate quality from past proxies, so the argument of «unprecedented» growth can not be used» is perfectly valid and is true.