Nicolas Bergeot from the Royal Observatory of Belgium talks about the interesting research
on ice mass balance and Earth's geomagnetic field he and his colleagues are carrying out...
Nicolas Bergeot from the Royal Observatory of Belgium talks about the interesting research
on ice mass balance and Earth's geomagnetic field he and his colleagues are carrying out at the Princess Elisabeth Antarctica research station.
Not exact matches
David Ullman, a postdoctoral researcher at Oregon State University and lead author
on the study, said there are two mechanisms through which
ice sheets diminish — dynamically, from the jettisoning of icebergs at the fringes, or by a negative «surface
mass balance,» which compares the amount of snow accumulation relative to melting.
Detailed net
mass balance of the
ice plain on Ice Stream B, Antarctica: A GIS Approach, Journal of Glaciology, V
ice plain
on Ice Stream B, Antarctica: A GIS Approach, Journal of Glaciology, V
Ice Stream B, Antarctica: A GIS Approach, Journal of Glaciology, Vol.
Negative
mass balances on tributary glaciers can lead to thinning of the glaciers and
ice shelves.
That estimate was based in part
on the fact that sea level is now rising 3.2 mm / yr (3.2 m / millennium)[57], an order of magnitude faster than the rate during the prior several thousand years, with rapid change of
ice sheet
mass balance over the past few decades [23] and Greenland and Antarctica now losing
mass at accelerating rates [23]--[24].
Overall, I estimate the
mass balance of the Greenland
ice sheet to be about -80 + / -10 cubic km of
ice per year in 2000 and -110 + / -15 cubic km of
ice per year in 2004, i.e. more negative than based
on partial altimetry surveys of the outlet glaciers.
[Response: Surface
mass balance on the
ice sheets is a good example.
[Response: Rain
on the flanks is not that uncommon, but enough rain
on the bulk of the
ice sheet to affect the surface
mass balance as much as you suggest is not
on.
So I had to back up the story of my trip to Alaska with satellite data
on sea
ice, and I had to justify my pictures of disappearing glaciers in the Andes with long - term records of
mass balance of mountain glaciers.
The overall global glacier
mass balance trend is shown
on the National Snow and
Ice Data Center (NDIS) graph here.
The findings reinforce suggestions that strong positive
ice — temperature feedbacks have emerged in the Arctic15, increasing the chances of further rapid warming and sea
ice loss, and will probably affect polar ecosystems,
ice - sheet
mass balance and human activities in the Arctic...» *** This is the heart of polar amplification and has very little to do with your stated defintion of amplifying the effects of warming going
on at lower latitudes.
We quantify sea - level commitment in the baseline case by building
on Levermann et al. (10), who used physical simulations to model the SLR within a 2,000 - y envelope as the sum of the contributions of (i) ocean thermal expansion, based
on six coupled climate models; (ii) mountain glacier and
ice cap melting, based
on surface
mass balance and simplified
ice dynamic models; (iii) Greenland
ice sheet decay, based
on a coupled regional climate model and
ice sheet dynamic model; and (iv) Antarctic
ice sheet decay, based
on a continental - scale model parameterizing grounding line
ice flux in relation to temperature.
Annual net
balance on eight North Cascades glaciers during the 1984 - 1994 period has been determined by measurement, of total
mass loss from firn and
ice melt and, of residual snow depth at the end of the summer season.
«A high - resolution record of Greenland
mass balance» «Antarctica, Greenland and Gulf of Alaska land -
ice evolution from an iterated GRACE global mascon solution» «Greenland and Antarctica
ice sheet
mass changes and effects
on global sea level»
«(F) the cryosphere, including effects
on ice sheet
mass balance, mountain glacier
mass balance, and sea -
ice extent and volume;
Both the observations of
mass balance and the estimates based
on temperature changes (Table 11.4) indicate a reduction of
mass of glaciers and
ice caps in the recent past, giving a contribution to global - average sea level of 0.2 to 0.4 mm / yr over the last hundred years.
His presentation has some very interesting results
on sea
ice mass balance that are unpublished, which I didn't use, but I did include and some slides from Perovich's RS presentation illustrating some previously published field observations (labeled «courtesy of Don Perovich»).
The magnitude and importance of snowfall
on ice sheet
mass balance is illustrated by the story of Glacier Girl.
The key factor w / r / t sea - level rise is grounded
ice mass balance, especially in the world's two (or three, depending
on how you count) remaining large
ice sheets: Greenland and Antarctica.
Secondary objectives: Four secondary objectives have been defined: - To assess the effect of a more accurate simulation of sea
ice drift and deformation
on the Arctic sea
ice mass balance and distribution properties of sea
ice age.
The most recent data from
ice mass balance buoys in Storfjroden, Svalbard and
on iceberg - fast
ice in Fram Strait show that the melt season has started.
That estimate was based in part
on the fact that sea level is now rising 3.2 mm / yr (3.2 m / millennium)[57], an order of magnitude faster than the rate during the prior several thousand years, with rapid change of
ice sheet
mass balance over the past few decades [23] and Greenland and Antarctica now losing
mass at accelerating rates [23]--[24].
Whether a glacier retreats or advances each year largely depends
on its
mass balance — the difference between how much snow it receives and the amount of its
ice that melts away.
Just a short list: — you go
on and
on about SMB causing a net reduction of sea level in Antarctica (and sometimes Greenland), completely ignoring that SMB is not the total
ice mass balance — you routinely mentioned that human emissions aren't increasing the CO2 concentration because those emissions didn't increase for several years in a row, but concentration did.
Only a detailed analysis of buoy data and field observations will help resolve this question, but an
ice mass balance buoy placed
on 1.4 meter thick first - year
ice north of Barrow in April has managed to survive into the late melt season, drifting 1,000 kilometers to the North over the course of the summer.
The surface
mass balance of the glacier is the difference of accumulating snow
on the
ice sheet (its income) and snow and
ice losses from melting and calving (its expenditures).
The recent, marked increase in
ice discharge from many of Greenland» slarge outlet glaciers has upended the conventional view that variations in
ice - sheet
mass balance are dominated
on short time scales by variations in surface
balance, rather than
ice dynamics.
In fact, there are now well over 150 individual assessments of
ice sheet
mass balance based
on measurements acquired by at least 15 different satellite missions.
Glacier
mass balance is measured once or twice annually
on numerous stakes
on the several
ice caps in Iceland by the National Energy Authority.
Annual
mass balance is the difference between winter snow and
ice accumulation
on a glacier, and summer snow and
ice loss from a glacier during a given year.
The papers do not address the total
mass balance of the
ice sheets, and the authors admit that the ablation at the edges may offset the gains
on the interior.
To quote from AR5 WG1: «While surface melting will remain small, an increase in snowfall
on the Antarctic
ice sheet is expected (medium confidence), resulting in a negative contribution to future sea level from changes in surface
mass balance.»
Padman, L., D. P. Costa, M. S. Dinniman, H. A. Fricker, M. E. Goebel, L. A. Huckstadt, A. Humbert, I. Joughin, J. T. M. Lenaerts, S. R. M. Ligtenberg, T. Scambos and M. R. van den Broeke «Oceanic controls
on the
mass balance of Wilkins
Ice Shelf, Antarctica.»
These observations reveal a widespread, dynamic subglacial water system which may exert an important control
on ice flow and
mass balance.
Studies based
on satellite observations do not provide unequivocal evidence concerning the
mass balance of the East Antarctic
ice sheet; some appear to indicate marginal thickening (Davis et al., 2005), while others indicate little change (Zwally et al., 2005; Velicogna and Wahr, 2006; Wingham et al., 2006).