In parallel we need significant investment in research
on ice sheet models.
Sea level from equations (3.3) and (3.4) is shown by the blue curves in figure 2, including comparison (figure 2c) with the Late Pleistocene sea - level record of Rohling et al. [47], which is based on analysis of Red Sea sediments, and comparison (figure 2b) with the sea - level chronology of de Boer et al. [46], which is based
on ice sheet modelling with the δ18O data of Zachos et al. [4] as a principal input driving the ice sheet model.
Not exact matches
Materials scientists hope their computer
model results will spark further research into the effects of carbon dioxide
on fracturing in glaciers and
ice sheets
This allowed them to calculate the redistribution of mass
on Earth's surface due to the melting of the Greenland and Antarctic
ice sheets and mountain glaciers, and
model the shift in Earth's axis.
Over the current century, the
model projects that the average albedo for the entire
ice sheet will fall by as much as 8 percent, and by as much 10 percent
on the western edge, where the
ice is darkest today.
Modeling studies
on geoengineering to reflect sunlight away from the Earth suggest that modifying the planet's reflectivity could slow the meltdown of the Greenland
ice sheet in the short term, but not stop it entirely, and could still allow an eventual total meltdown in the next millennia or so.
The international team of co-authors, led by Peter Clark of Oregon State University, generated new scenarios for temperature rise, glacial melting, sea - level rise and coastal flooding based
on state - of - the - art climate and
ice sheet models.
But most of all, she wanted to know whether Pappalardo's
model of Europa's
ice sheet jibed with all he had learned from almost 30 years of studying
ice on Earth.
Based
on the southern core we thought this was a localized low heat - flux region — but our
model shows that a much larger part of the southern
ice sheet has low heat flux.
Many older
models of Greenland assumed that its massive
ice sheet sat
on bedrock that was relatively flat, even though scientists did not know the full thickness of the
ice.
But the large volumes of data
on Arctic sea and land
ice that IceBridge has collected during its nine years of operations there have also enabled scientific discoveries ranging from the first map showing what parts of the bottom of the massive Greenland Ice Sheet are thawed to improvements in snowfall accumulation models for all of Greenla
ice that IceBridge has collected during its nine years of operations there have also enabled scientific discoveries ranging from the first map showing what parts of the bottom of the massive Greenland
Ice Sheet are thawed to improvements in snowfall accumulation models for all of Greenla
Ice Sheet are thawed to improvements in snowfall accumulation
models for all of Greenland.
Combining the speed and thickness measurements allowed the scientists to determine how much
ice was flowing into the ocean, while the climate
model allowed them to estimate how much snow was falling
on the
ice sheet.
In this
model of Titan, however, the roots extending below the
ice sheet are so much bigger than the bumps
on the surface that their buoyancy is pushing them up against the
ice sheet.
Based
on a
model that excludes
ice sheet flow due to a lack of basis in published literature, it is estimated that sea level rise will be, in a low scenario, 18 to 38 cm (7 to 15 inches) and in a high scenario, 26 to 59 cm (10 to 23 inches).
A 3 - D
model for the Antarctic
ice sheet: a sensitivity study
on the glacial - interglacial contrast.
SALSA will gather data from permanent GPS stations to better understand subglacial water flow's influence
on the larger
ice sheet system and improve subglacial lake
modeling through comparing our
model's estimates against geochemical data.
170 (Symposium
on Physical Basis of
Ice Sheet Modelling, Vancouver), p. 313 - 322, 1987.
Willis, M J, Wilson, T J, James, T S, Mazzotti, S, (2009), GPS Constraints
on Glacial Isostatic Adjustment
Models and Implications for
Ice Sheet Mass Balance in West Antarctica, Eos Trans.
A new study combines the latest observations with an
ice sheet model to estimate that melting
ice on the Antarctic
ice sheet is likely to add 10 cm to global sea levels by 2100, but it could be as much as 30 cm.
One recent
modeling study focused
on this mode of instability estimated that the Antarctic
ice sheet has a 1 - in - 20 chance of contributing about 30 centimeters (1.0 feet) to global average sea - level rise over the course of this century and 72 centimeters (2.4 feet) by the end of the next century.
reconstructing sea - level and
ice -
sheet changes
on timescales ranging from the 20th century, to the late Holocene, to the last 150 thousand years, through statistical and geophysical
modeling of geological and observational records;
No longer do we need to rely
on guesswork and computer
modeling, because satellite images reveal a dramatic disappearance of glaciers, Antarctic
ice shelves and polar
ice sheets.
Hansen et al. recently explored the effect of stratification of meltwater water
on storminess, sea surface temperature and sea level rise and found that, among other things, their
model predicted strong feedbacks in
ice sheet exposure to destabilizing influences.
(By the way, the I.P.C.C. didn't exclude the
ice -
sheet dynamics but they did say that the
models currently were not good enough to do anything but to linearly extrapolate, and therefore they simply assumed the flow from Greenland and Antarctica based
on the period 1993 - 2003.)
In a more recent paper, our own Stefan Rahmstorf used a simple regression
model to suggest that sea level rise (SLR) could reach 0.5 to 1.4 meters above 1990 levels by 2100, but this did not consider individual processes like dynamic
ice sheet changes, being only based
on how global sea level has been linked to global warming over the past 120 years.
This result would be strongly dependent
on the exact dynamic response of the Greenland
ice sheet to surface meltwater, which is
modeled poorly in todays global models.Yes human influence
on the climate is real and we might even now be able to document changes in the behavior of weather phenomena related to disasters (e.g., Emanuel 2005), but we certainly haven't yet seen it in the impact record (i.e., economic losses) of extreme events.
Or is the freshwater flux to the ocean from the melting
ice sheet for some reason not represented in the
models as a forcing
on the circulation?
When are we going to see «the physics» of
ice sheets on Greenland and Antarctica added to the
models?
Along with David Schilling, I had developed a
model to reconstruct former
ice sheets with
ice elevations based
on the strength of
ice - bed coupling determined by glacial geology.
For example, Hansen's recent paper
on Scientific Reticence is quite explicit that much of important physics of
ice sheets is not included in the
models, hence his raising of matters to do with nonlinear behaviour (eg disintegration) of
ice sheets.
This result would be strongly dependent
on the exact dynamic response of the Greenland
ice sheet to surface meltwater, which is
modeled poorly in todays global
models.
Our physical patterns are based
on the physics of glacier /
ice sheet melt (static equioibrium fingerprints), glacial isostatic adjustment
models, and an ensemble of GCMs to inform the ocean dynamic contribution.
So, if some of these ideas
on termination of glaciations are correct (
ice -
sheet temperature, ocean circulation and CO2), and all of these are omitted from the current
model, it leaves open the possibility that a more comprehensive
model would get a different result.
Ricarda Winkelmann et al.
modeled the response of the Antarctic
ice sheet to a wide range of future carbon emissions scenarios over the long - term (previous simulations have mainly looked at changes that might occur
on a shorter timescale).
Beadling, R., 2016: Impact of the melting of the Greenland
ice sheet on the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation in 21st century
model projections.
On unreliability of
models see O'Reilly et al. (2012), pp. 721 - 22; «there is still no robust, credible
model for the interaction of melting
ice sheets with the ocean,» Holland and Holland (2015).
With a much - needed GRACE follow -
on mission being planned and expected to launch around 2017, observation and
modelling of Antarctic GIA will continue to give us insights into the
ice sheet history — from the LGM through to the present — and hence provide the context for any future changes.
Well it depends
on whether you are talking about Climate Sensitivity (Charney sensitivity... which is
modelled) or Earth System Sensitivity (where things like
ice sheet extent, vegetation cover etc are regarded as able to respond quickly to warming).
These values have been estimated using relatively simple climate
models (one low - resolution AOGCM and several EMICs based
on the best estimate of 3 °C climate sensitivity) and do not include contributions from melting
ice sheets, glaciers and
ice caps.
We used an ensemble of
ice sheet model runs and plausible Earth
models to place bounded constraints
on our mass change estimate.
We quantify sea - level commitment in the baseline case by building
on Levermann et al. (10), who used physical simulations to
model the SLR within a 2,000 - y envelope as the sum of the contributions of (i) ocean thermal expansion, based
on six coupled climate
models; (ii) mountain glacier and
ice cap melting, based
on surface mass balance and simplified
ice dynamic
models; (iii) Greenland
ice sheet decay, based
on a coupled regional climate
model and
ice sheet dynamic
model; and (iv) Antarctic
ice sheet decay, based
on a continental - scale
model parameterizing grounding line
ice flux in relation to temperature.
Paleontological records indicate that global mean sea level is highly sensitive to temperature (7) and that
ice sheets, the most important contributors to large - magnitude sea - level change, can respond to warming
on century time scales (8), while
models suggest
ice sheets require millennia to approach equilibrium (9).
But those projections were based
on climate
model simulations that did not consider melting of the Greenland
Ice Sheet and may, therefore, be too conservative.
A goal of 2C as calculated by current
models is not protective of permafrost, clathrates, or
ice sheets on a 50 year planning horizon from time of crossing the 1C mark.
To assure the
model was realistic, the scientists drew
on observations of changes in the altitude of the
ice sheet surface made by NASA's IceSat satellite and airborne Operation IceBridge campaign.
And Dr Bougamont said: «There are two sources of net
ice loss: melting
on the surface and increased flow of the
ice itself, and there is a connection between these mechanisms that isn't taken into account by standard
ice sheet models.»
Pfeiffer, M. & Lohmann, G. Greenland
ice sheet influence
on last interglacial climate: global sensitivity studies performed with an atmosphere — ocean general circulation
model.
Computer
models suggest that just small amounts of melting in the coming decades could destabilize the entire
ice sheet on the western part of the frozen continent, researchers at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany say in a new study.
Mistakes in computer
models are taken to be the final word
on the paucity of evidence of manmade climate change, and an anomalous measurement of Greenland's
ice sheet spells the end of the world.
(sarc) The correct answer to all political questions about TCR global sun - induced ozone recovery sensitivity (50 % undefined or rather obscurely neglecting the
modelling of bark beetles and their
modelled «black carbon»
on ice sheets.)