Sentences with phrase «on important scientific issues»

But Voinnet, Baulcombe writes, also showed «hard work and [the] ability to focus on the important scientific issues to the exclusion of everything else, including the real world.»

They will be wondering why public opinion on a important scientific issue was manipulated for political and short term economic purposes.

Not exact matches

Additionally, at Oregon State University, the Research and Service Grant funds connect the craft brewing community with world - class research capabilities and enable Thomas H. Shellhammer, Ph.D., Nor» Wester professor of fermentation science, to work on industry - relevant scientific and technical issues that not only advance science but answer important and practical questions faced by craft brewers.

The important distinction here is — are those on opposite sides of the issue all willing to pay attention to scientific evidence.

The letter acknowledged the Twitter response CDC Director Brenda Fitzgerald issued Sunday, assuring the public that CDC has not banned any words and will continue to base its «important public health programs» on scientific facts.

«From a public health perspective, even a weak effect of temperature on health constitutes an important problem due to ubiquity of exposure,» Manuela De Sario and Paola Michelozzi, both of the Lazio Region Department of Epidemiology in Rome and co-authors of an editorial that appears in the same issue of the BMJ, explained in an e-mail to Scientific American.

«We are not looking for them to comment on the scientific reliability of the paper or its originality or importance to clinicians, but to tell us if the research question addresses an issue which is important to them as patients.»

The result is that Canadians — and the rest of the world — have been denied the chance to hear from some of the most authoritative scientific voices on important issues ranging from the Arctic ozone hole to radiation after the Fukushima Daiichi reactor accident in Japan, and even the effect of aquaculture on wild salmon.

The letter ends with a promise of collaboration, saying, «We in the scientific community are prepared to work with you on the scientific issues important to your deliberations as you seek to address the challenges of our changing climate.»

Said Fred Kavli, chairman and founder of The Kavli Foundation: «It is my hope that the Kavli Prize Science Forum provides a valuable and continuing opportunity for scientists and policymakers to engage on issues important to scientific research.

The ceremony is part of Kavli Prize Week - a week of special programs that celebrate extraordinary achievements in science, educate the public on important scientific advances, and bring together distinguished members of the international community to discuss key global issues in science and science policy.

«Crick had a superb intellect which he brought to bear on a number of very important scientific issues.

In addition, FEDIAF's Scientific Advisory Board has issued a statement on nutrition of senior dogs - with a view to extended life expectancy of pets this statement was seen as important to explain the nutritional requirements of senior dogs.

Their initial piece, «Climate change is real: an open letter from the scientific community,» is on The Conversation, an academic Web site aiming to provide a credible source of information and analysis on important issues as traditional journalism shrinks.

I submit that your real mission is not to provide more data for a (admittedly fascinating) scientific study of pattern recognition, it's to disseminate accurate information on one of the world's most important scientific issues.

Important issues should be addressed with the scientific community as well as regular citizens because modern world is derailing man from its track and 33 % of obesity promising to reach 50 % by 2050 should be an important issue for dealing to learn on the best options to curb suchImportant issues should be addressed with the scientific community as well as regular citizens because modern world is derailing man from its track and 33 % of obesity promising to reach 50 % by 2050 should be an important issue for dealing to learn on the best options to curb suchimportant issue for dealing to learn on the best options to curb such dilemma.

The findings of V+S represent an important contribution to the ongoing scientific discourse on the issue of climate change impacts on tropical cyclones, and the study should spur additional work looking at the complicated issues involved in greater detail.

Science historians would point out that Professor Revelle did not prompt the first CO2 measurement in the atmosphere; what he prompted was the first sampling of air from locations around the world, and it was actually Harry Wexler, the head of the Weather Service at the time, who prompted and actually funded the start of the long - term monitoring program by David Keeling on Mauna Loa — so Revelle did play a very important role in stimulating observations (and in 1965 he chaired the panel on this issue that prepared a quite insightful appendix for the report of the President's Scientific Advisory Council), but Revelle was not the very first to urge CO2 be measured in the atmosphere.

But even with the «environmental» groups» strong influence, the Obama Administration may not have trusted the SAB to render the invalid scientific conclusions on climate alarmism they wanted in their Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Endangerment Finding and failed to submit their GHG Endangerment Finding to the SAB for review despite the clear need for it to do so on such an important and influential issue.

Two days ago, I wrote that for me the real issue in the upcoming Mann vs Steyn trial is not so much my own personal freedom of speech but the broader freedom to speak given «the climate of fear that Mann and his fellow ayatollahs of alarmism have succeeded in imposing on an important scientific field»:

The ability of our society and public officials to make good decisions about important issues depends on a free, honest, and accurate flow of scientific research and findings.

Climate Change Reconsidered is an immensely important contribution to genuine scientific debate on issues where unscientific fear - mongering has thus far triumphed.

The three lead NIPCC authors — Craig Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer — reveal how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

In November, 2015, the three lead NIPCC authors — Craig Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer — wrote a small book titled Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming: The NIPCC Report on Scientific Consensus revealing how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimaScientific Consensus revealing how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climascientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

That's also brought upon the observation, throughout my experience over all the years of these negotiations, that often it was the richer countries that had better scientific advice and better analysis and could effectively outmanoeuvre on important issues, smaller countries.

Our egos could not take the hit of being so wrong on what we have made the most politically important scientific issue of our day.

This is an important question, because (as I have shown in previous research) negativity toward scientists is associated with the rejection of scientific consensus on issues like climate change.

The slides detail Exxon's rational for involving itself with NOAA on this issue, including «assess the possible impact of the greenhouse effect on Exxon business» and «generate important scientific information that will enhance the Exxon image and provide public relations value.»

By the same token the hundreds of comments on this thread are important raw data on a major scientific issue that is not well recognized (and is policy relevant).