«This bottom up demand which normally we always want to have and rely
on in a representative democracy, is in my view unlikely to work in the case of climate change policy as it has for other environmental problems....
Not exact matches
In a true democracy, those representatives present a platform that will act on the wishes of the majority; however it is up to the person seeking election to inform voters of their intent should they be successful in their pursui
In a true
democracy, those
representatives present a platform that will act
on the wishes of the majority; however it is up to the person seeking election to inform voters of their intent should they be successful
in their pursui
in their pursuit.
Much that is anything but true
democracy may hide behind the fagade of
representative democracy;
on the other hand, a society which is not democratically constituted
in the normal sense of the word may sometimes achieve what a
democracy aims at.
On the other hand, populism can describe a conception of the appropriate relation between governors and governed
in a
representative democracy.
Neoliberalism has the audacity to assert openly the
representative democracy that we have is not the supreme value;
on the contrary, intrinsically it is an inadequate instrument that can easily become excessive (and
in fact becomes it.)
It is one of the blessings of
democracy that this is so, for
in part these procedures depend
on individual attitudes, and
in other matters
on political action
in which
representatives in government must eventually be responsive to the people's demands.
In (functioning)
representative democracies, we elect governments to deliberate
on our behalf.
Looking at the discussion
on differences between
representative and direct
democracy might be useful
in this context.
Just as a board of directors for a large company may not want to undertake the time and effort to review and make decisions
on every matter the company faces (due to their time constraints), those represented
in a
democracy similarly may wish to delegate the responsibility of legislating to their
representatives.
This would allow legislators, the public and media to weigh -
in on the appropriateness of these allocations before the budget is passed to better engage citizens
in this
representative democracy.
«The most powerful voices
in this
representative democracy are not
on the second and third floors of the state Capitol or
in the suites of lobbying offices
on State Street
in Albany.
«We live
in a
representative democracy, and the governor and the Legislature are going to make a decision
on $ 160 billion - plus of public monies,» he said, referring to the state budget.
The only sensible solution to all the imbalances and over population problems —
in a
representative democracy — must surely be for the electorate to decide who is most suitable to legislate
on their behalf, irrespective of age!»
Representative democracy hinges
on representatives keeping
in close contact with citizens.
[2] It also campaigns for improvements to public elections and
representative democracy, and is a regular commentator
on all aspects of representation, public participation and democratic governance
in the United Kingdom.
These ideas are likely to have left an impression
on the public, perhaps fueling cynicism about politics and about the democratic process, and undermining the trust
in institutions and
in one another, across lines of difference, that is essential for the functioning of
representative democracy.
In his speech, President Lincoln called
on the people to ensure the survival of America's
representative democracy.
The purposes of the Commission
on Civics Education include the education of students
on the importance of citizen involvement
in a
representative democracy, the promotion of the study of state and local government among the commonwealth's citizenry, and the enhancement of communication and collaboration among organizations
in the commonwealth that conduct civics education programs.
In representative democracies, an argument can be made that individual procedural rights are satisfied by duly elected representatives who participate in government decisions on cap and trad
In representative democracies, an argument can be made that individual procedural rights are satisfied by duly elected
representatives who participate
in government decisions on cap and trad
in government decisions
on cap and trade.
As James Madison wrote
in the Federalist papers, our
democracy should have
representatives «dependent
on the people alone.»
It would also be
in the interest of our
democracy to allow for secret ballots
in parliament as opposed to the current system wherein
representatives are simply required to toe the party line,
on all issues.
The argument can be made that the question of membership should have been resolved through a general election and
representative democracy in the first place, rather than an unpredictable exercise
in direct
democracy on a matter which was susceptible to misinformation and misconceptions.
The Churchill Society for the Advancement of Parliamentary
Democracy,
in partnership with the University of Toronto Munk Centre, has organized a free Citizens» Forum where
representatives from the three major political parties can express their views
on the «crisis» & how they believe things will unfold once Parliament resumes
on the 26th.
«Constitutional
democracy means that institutions have different jobs to do and Parliament has its job to do, which is a very important job — to put before Parliament and vote
on laws
in accordance with the views of the government of the day and their
representatives.
Introduced today
in the House by
Representative Nita Lowey and earlier this year by Senator Barbara Boxer
in the Senate, the Global
Democracy Promotion Act would prohibit restrictions
on US.