Sentences with phrase «on irrelevant topics»

It is highly important, however, to note that collecting materials on irrelevant topics / ideas should be avoided.
Online learners receive an individualized experience instead of a generic eLearning course that touches on irrelevant topics.
I rather shared the belief that teh Dawkins ain't an authority in what counts as a delution, Matt, but thanks for probing my mind on an irrelevant topic.

Not exact matches

and that's why your discussion of authorship is irrelevant on that particular topic.
As for the Netherlands, it looks like somebody misled you (whether purposely or not I don't know) by feeding you information on «infant mortality,» which is irrelevant to the topic of home birth.
Read a book, that's completely irrelevant to your course and instructional design, spend some time outside, try exciting things for the first time, meet new people, re-decorate and de-clutter your office, start a journal, do a research on a topic that interests you.
Just delete the irrelevant topics on the last three slides (covering paper 3);) Enjoy!
The thesis writer can support you with making your topic more focused on areas that you are interested in, which will stop you from having irrelevant information to your interests or focus.
However, you don't want irrelevant content showing up on the topics listings or search, and neither do we.
On many sectors, the students are allowed to select the topic as per their choice and can look for different coursework examples to have a clear idea but they should not be irrelevant to their classes or contradict such requirements.
When they are asked to write the assignments on any of the concerned issue or topic they might end up with irrelevant thoughts and facts which could terminate their chances of scoring high grades and marks.
This question is very important as you do not want to waste your money on a piece of work which is irrelevant to your topic or is written in poor English language.
Mr. Daniels, here's how I know that you both don't know the book industry very well, and haven't even bothered to read this (or any other) discussion thread on the topic: while your analysis about real costs probably seemed clever and on point, it is in fact irrelevant because, as has been pointed out several times, minimum wage workers are not the market for books.
While some of you will no doubt be quick to point out that certain types of insurance are available on a claims made basis, and while you're not wrong, that's irrelevant to the topic at hand.
But when I speak about how evaluating externalities and a variety of «costs» from fossil fuel usage, I get called all sorts of names, told that my point is irrelevant, threatened to be cut off from being allowed to post on the topic, have what I say mischaracterized, etc..
And now you insult by implying I would write comments on someones blog without reading the OP, which is what it looks like you've done here, since you are diluting the thread with irrelevant off - topic provocations.
It is telling that people who rely on his blog even 10 years later do not learn about the correction notice we published in the same journal immediately thereafter, see: http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/gdptemp.html showing results before and after the correction, notably showing that the original conclusions all stood; not to mention the series of papers I've published since then on the same topic without the cosine issue arising, because it was always irrelevant to the actual issues (see http://www.rossmckitrick.com/temperature-data-quality.html).
On the heels of the European Court of Justice's decision, discussed on Slaw here and here, to require Google to suppress links to particular web sites that had «irrelevant and outdated» personal information about a complainant, and US courts» refusal to do the same, the British Columbia Supreme Court has now gone a step further: it has ordered Google to ensure that searches for particular topics or a particular company do not find the company defendant in the action before iOn the heels of the European Court of Justice's decision, discussed on Slaw here and here, to require Google to suppress links to particular web sites that had «irrelevant and outdated» personal information about a complainant, and US courts» refusal to do the same, the British Columbia Supreme Court has now gone a step further: it has ordered Google to ensure that searches for particular topics or a particular company do not find the company defendant in the action before ion Slaw here and here, to require Google to suppress links to particular web sites that had «irrelevant and outdated» personal information about a complainant, and US courts» refusal to do the same, the British Columbia Supreme Court has now gone a step further: it has ordered Google to ensure that searches for particular topics or a particular company do not find the company defendant in the action before it.
On one hand, a lot of stuff on the internet is irrelevant, off - topic garbage, and one could say that it makes perfect sense for legal blogs to focus on legal topics, because that is the content people visit them to reaOn one hand, a lot of stuff on the internet is irrelevant, off - topic garbage, and one could say that it makes perfect sense for legal blogs to focus on legal topics, because that is the content people visit them to reaon the internet is irrelevant, off - topic garbage, and one could say that it makes perfect sense for legal blogs to focus on legal topics, because that is the content people visit them to reaon legal topics, because that is the content people visit them to read.
While some of you will no doubt be quick to point out that certain types of insurance are available on a claims made basis, and while you're not wrong, that's irrelevant to the topic at hand.
These topics seem at first glance to be irrelevant to much of the country, but if you look at recent changes to the real estate marketplaces in Florida and New Orleans, the implication of insurance industry moves to protect themselves from mega payouts has had a deep impact on values.
My personal opinion on this topic is irrelevant but that of my now 23, 21, 20 and 18 year old are.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z