Alberts's editorial also notes that relying
on journal impact factors to evaluate a scientist's research output «creates a strong disincentive to pursue risky and potentially groundbreaking work, because it takes years to create a new approach in a new experimental context, during which no publications should be expected.»
Science Careers» sister site, ScienceInsider, reported yesterday afternoon that 150 scientists and 75 scientific groups have co-signed an open letter protesting what they claim is an overreliance
on journal impact factors by funding agencies, academic institutions, journals, and organizations that provide publication metrics.
Not exact matches
The
Journal of the American Medical Association just released a study that found a county where a person resides can make as much an
impact on their heath as other
factors, like ethnicity and genetics.
Researchers insisted to MPs that institutions did not base funding
on «
impact factor» — the coverage that publication in a
journal may secure in the mainstream press, but the committee appeared unconvinced.
Chair Andrew Miller said: «There is an element of chance in getting articles accepted in high -
impact journals, depending
on topicality and other
factors.
If you continue your search
on the Web of Knowledge site, you will find that review
journals and review - and - methods articles have the highest
impact factor.
• Assess
impact factors based
on whether your grandparents think they've heard of the
journal.
Earlier this year, a group of concerned scientists and
journal publishers signed an open letter known as the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) to encourage review boards and tenure committees to «eliminate the use of journal - based metrics, such as Journal Impact Factors, in funding, appointment, and promotion considerations,» and to encourage the development of alternative metrics (altmetrics) to measure a scientist's research contrib
journal publishers signed an open letter known as the San Francisco Declaration
on Research Assessment (DORA) to encourage review boards and tenure committees to «eliminate the use of
journal - based metrics, such as Journal Impact Factors, in funding, appointment, and promotion considerations,» and to encourage the development of alternative metrics (altmetrics) to measure a scientist's research contrib
journal - based metrics, such as
Journal Impact Factors, in funding, appointment, and promotion considerations,» and to encourage the development of alternative metrics (altmetrics) to measure a scientist's research contrib
Journal Impact Factors, in funding, appointment, and promotion considerations,» and to encourage the development of alternative metrics (altmetrics) to measure a scientist's research contributions.
As discussed in articles from the Lancet to the New York Times, promotions and pay rely heavily
on the number of publications a researcher has and the
impact factors of the
journals.
At last month's Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting — an annual gathering of laureates and young scientists — Nobel prize - winner Randy Schekman, founder of open - access
journal eLife, insisted that researchers should be judged
on the quality of their research, rather than the
impact factor of the
journal in which they publish or the reputation of their institution.
He insisted that researchers should be judged
on the quality of their research, rather than the
impact factor of the
journal in which they publish or their institution's reputation.
«A focus
on publication of reports in
journals with high
impact factors and success in securing of funding leads scientists to seek short - term success instead of cautious, deliberative, robust research,» the authors of the introductory piece write.
A recent study in the BioMed Central
journal «Human Resources for Health,» led by New York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing (NYU Meyers) Associate Professor Allison Squires, PhD RN, FAAN examines if country - level contextual
factors have an
impact on Human Resources for Health (HRH) and to what extent.
Until now, most rigorous metrics of scientific
impact have relied
on citations: the number of peer - reviewed articles a scientist has written, the «
impact factor» of the
journals in which they were published, and how many times other scientists have cited those articles.
If you've signed the San Francisco Declaration
on Research Assessment (http://am.ascb.org/dora/), or you just don't think a metric designed for a
journal should be used to evaluate individual scientists, avert your eyes: Journal impact factor has a strong influence on a scientist's probability of attaining PI
journal should be used to evaluate individual scientists, avert your eyes:
Journal impact factor has a strong influence on a scientist's probability of attaining PI
Journal impact factor has a strong influence
on a scientist's probability of attaining PI - ship.
Impact Factor: 11.597 Issues Per Year: 12 issues per year Aims and Scope: Trends in Genetics was launched in 1985 and quickly became a «must read»
journal for geneticists, known for its concise, accessible articles
on a range of topics from developmental biology to evolution.
The declaration, also signed by Bruce Alberts, editor - in - chief of Science, and Sir Paul Nurse, president of the Royal Society, says that
journals should reduce their emphasis
on impact factors and make available a range of article - level metrics.
The movement placed renewed attention
on the misuse of
journal - based metrics, such as the Journal Impact Factor (JIF), and focused on the task of freeing research assessment from their inf
journal - based metrics, such as the
Journal Impact Factor (JIF), and focused on the task of freeing research assessment from their inf
Journal Impact Factor (JIF), and focused
on the task of freeing research assessment from their influence.
PLOS supports DORA — the San Francisco Declaration
on Research Assessment — and does not promote our
journal Impact Factors.
Authors will benefit from the robust
journal activities including very rapid review (average time to decision is less than 23 days, 14 days to online publication), high visibility and
impact (papers publicized
on journal website, monthly newsletters, Facebook, Twitter, 2011
impact factor 3.368,), and author services (connection to nomenclature services, pre-publication annotation of data for submission to data resources and repositories, as well as video and other alternative content as part of the embedded content).
Head and Neck Oncology, an open access
journal with a closed peer - review system, achieved its first official
impact factor on the 2nd of July, 2012.
In order to create a culture around research assessment that is free from metrics including
Journal Impact Factor, the university held a series of meetings to facilitate discussions with researchers
on the best ways to create change.
Researchers have found that BDNF levels decline progressively with age.10 Lommatzsch, M., et al. «The
Impact of Age, Weight and Gender
on BDNF Levels in Human Platelets and Plasma,» Neurobiology of Aging 26 (2005):... continue At the same time that BDNF levels decrease, the volume of the hippocampus (primary center for emotion and memory) also decreases.11 Erickson, K.L., et al. «Brain - Derived Neurotrophic
Factor is Associated with Age - Related Decline in Hippocampal Volume,
Journal of Neuroscience 30,... continue In fact, in some neurological diseases, such as Huntington's and Alzheimer's disease, BDNF levels are low or deficient.12 Laske, C., et al. «Decreased Brain - Derived Neurotrophic
Factor (BDNF) and B - Thromboglobulin Blood Levels in Alzheimer's Disease,»
Journal of... continue
I'm working
on a Properly Peer - Reviewed Paper for an Approved Climatologists - Type
Journal having an extremely high
Impact Factor.
Additionally, the most - cited
journal on the list was Energy and Environment, a
journal with a very low
impact factor, and whose editors are AGW skeptics.
The search was performed exclusively
on scientific
journals with an
impact factor of at least 3 (
Journal Citation Reports science edition 2010).
And if they hadn't so decided, despite hand - wringing and claims or inferences of victimization, the authors would have survived, and been free to do what so many authors of papers do when their studies are rejected for publication: look to publish in another
journal — perhaps one with a lower
impact factor — or make substantial revisions and try to publish elsewhere, or move
on to something else.
Elsevier's APC price points are based
on «
journal impact factor; the
journal's editorial and technical processes; competitive considerations; market conditions; other revenue streams associated with the
journal.»
Subscription pricing is also not based primarily
on cost, but rather
on «article volume;
journal impact factor;
journal usage; editorial processes; competitive considerations; and other revenue streams such as commercial contributions from advertising, reprints and supplements.»
However, as a check
on quality control, we also examined whether several methodological characteristics (sample size, number of items in delinquency and parenting questionnaires, reliability of the parenting questionnaire, publication status, and
journal impact factor), moderated the link between parenting and delinquency.