It appears to reflect the recent emphasis by the courts
on judicial efficiency.
Not exact matches
Almost anyone who regularly toils in courthouses across Ontario — judges, prosecutors and defence lawyers — would say that despite previous rulings
on delays from the Supreme Court and
judicial warnings from lower courts, successive federal and provincial governments have failed to properly resource the justice system in a way that would ensure its fairness and
efficiency.
While the Honorable Judge Carton has already ruled
on Lindsay Lohan's suit against E * Trade arising out of the hilarious «milkaholic» baby commercial, the real suit, in a testament to the
efficiency and rationality of our
judicial system, is still pending.
If the
efficiency of a
judicial system was assessed based
on the frequency with which lawyers use Latin phrases, I dare say Nigeria would make the top ten list.
matter of principle based
on the doctrine of separation of powers as well as a matter of policy founded
on the
efficiency of the system of criminal justice» which also recognizes that prosecutorial discretion is «especially ill - suited to
judicial review»... (cites omitted)
Judicial non-interference with prosecutorial discretion has been referred to as a «matter of principle based on the doctrine of separation of powers as well as a matter of policy founded on the efficiency of the system of criminal justice» which also recognizes that prosecutorial discretion is «especially ill - suited to judicial review»... (cites
Judicial non-interference with prosecutorial discretion has been referred to as a «matter of principle based
on the doctrine of separation of powers as well as a matter of policy founded
on the
efficiency of the system of criminal justice» which also recognizes that prosecutorial discretion is «especially ill - suited to
judicial review»... (cites
judicial review»... (cites omitted)
The American criminal justice system is far from being sufficiently enlightened, starting by too many presumed - innocent people caged without bond pending sentencing, moving to Virginia's crabbed criminal discovery system, continuing to Virginia's system that allows prosecutors to scare defendants to plead guilty by their refusal to waive a jury that in many instances and locations can mean more racist jurors than judges
on top of the jurors often being more wild cards than judges for sentencing, continuing to the many judges who choose
judicial efficiency over a fair trial, continuing to the brutal capital punishment system, cntinuing to excessive mandatory minimum and guideline sentencing, and continuing to the slew of innocent convicted people (many of whom plead gulilty rather than risking a worse fate), and continuing to frequently excessive sentences and excessive probation violation sentences.
Since the first
judicial opinion endorsing the use of Technology Assisted Review (or TAR) was written by Judge Andrew J. Peck in 2012, an entire legal industry has grown up
on the premise of streamlining the document review process in discovery — that is, taking a repetitive task traditionally performed entirely by attorneys and introducing the concept of computer assistance to increase
efficiency and improve consistency.
Because
judicial performance evaluations are «one of the few opportunities that attorneys have to comment
on the
efficiency and performance of a
judicial officer,» JPE commissions should make an effort to explain the importance of such surveys to attorneys and ensure identifying information never appears in the results.