An earlier post there (Ruminations
on judicial error) may also be of interest on the subject of system change.
Not exact matches
Albert Camus's essay «Reflections
on the Guillotine» cites a 19th - century French jurist's application of the law of probability to the chance of a
judicial error with a result of one innocent man's being condemned in every 257 criminal cases.
But shouldn't critics of «the
judicial usurpation of politics» take at least some comfort in the fact that the
error was
on the side of democracy, as it were?
An appeal
on the merits is not available for Tribunal merger authorisation decisions, but the ACCC is seeking
judicial review, alleging three reviewable
errors, including that the Tribunal erred in its reasoning that «it could only conclude that the proposed acquisition was likely to result in a detriment if the Tribunal concluded that there would be a substantial lessening of competition».
The problem is, however, that this standard is extremely vague and indeterminate, based
on projective speculation about which parent might in future be the «better» parent, and thus subject to
judicial bias and
error.
On Tuesday, the Board of Elections Cover Sheet Review Committee found that the Bronx Democrats had made
errors of three volumes of petitions involving
judicial delegates:
There are plenty of troubling examples of dubious forensics and downright
judicial errors, which have been documented by Hearing Voices, a science journalism project
on forensic science carried out by the authors of this article in 2015 and 2016.
This article reports
on the results of an empirical study of
judicial susceptibility to systematic
errors in judgment.
Ms. Raczynska failed to name the correct party
on her application for
judicial review, and failed to repair this
error or serve the Professional Corporation in the stipulated time frame (at paras 4, 5 citing Leon's Furniture Limited v Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner), 2011 ABCA 94).
For The
Judicial Branch: represent Superior Court trial judge before Connecticut Supreme Court
on Writ of
Error appeal; investigation of New Haven Juvenile Detention Center; and represent employees before the Statewide Grievance Committee.
In their submissions
on this motion, the carriers appear to be under the mistaken impression that an appeal is available
on errors of fact or that this is a
judicial review proceeding where the remedy for an omission to make a relevant finding of fact would be to remit the case back to the trier of fact.
Rather than equating the FSA's reliance
on the privileged material with the public law concept of taking into account an irrelevant matter, the judge held that it was more accurate to consider the
error as equivalent to a
judicial or administrative body acting, in part,
on inadmissible evidence.
In a takeoff from Malcolm Gladwell's best - selling book Blink, Professor Chris Guthrie drilled into
judicial error rates in Blinking
on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases, 93 Cornell L. Rev. 1 (2007).
There are essentially two types of
errors that might lead a court to overturn a RTB decision
on judicial review:
How serious does a substantive
error have to be for a court to set aside a RTB decision
on judicial review?
The concept of jurisdictional
error, with its teaching that
on some matters an administrative decision - maker must be correct or face
judicial intervention, has usually been at the eye of the storm.
He is one of the practitioners in the article who weigh in
on a recent Massachusetts Supreme
Judicial Court (SJC) decision and who all say that it provides much - needed relief for both residential lenders who wish to maintain their secured status despite certain technical
errors that appear in many borrowers» closing documents and the attorneys who seek to cure those
errors.
We have evolved from Mallios v. La Reine, [1978] Q.J. no 380, there Greenberg, J. of the Quebec Superior Court was considering whether the trial judge was in
error in taking
judicial notice of the fact that Montreal Harbour was in Canadian waters south of the sixtieth parallel of north latitude: 12 «Judicial Notice» is the act by which a Court, in conducting a trial or framing its decision, will of its own motion, and without production of evidence, recognize the existence and truth of certain facts having a bearing on the controversy, which are universally regarded as established by common notoriety; that is, facts which can not reasonably be the subject of a cont
judicial notice of the fact that Montreal Harbour was in Canadian waters south of the sixtieth parallel of north latitude: 12 «
Judicial Notice» is the act by which a Court, in conducting a trial or framing its decision, will of its own motion, and without production of evidence, recognize the existence and truth of certain facts having a bearing on the controversy, which are universally regarded as established by common notoriety; that is, facts which can not reasonably be the subject of a cont
Judicial Notice» is the act by which a Court, in conducting a trial or framing its decision, will of its own motion, and without production of evidence, recognize the existence and truth of certain facts having a bearing
on the controversy, which are universally regarded as established by common notoriety; that is, facts which can not reasonably be the subject of a controversy.
On that day West Virginia's governor formally signed HB 2010 ending partisan judicial races starting with the 2016 elections; the governor had issued a veto on HB 2010 previously not on the merits but due to typographical and reference errors in the bil
On that day West Virginia's governor formally signed HB 2010 ending partisan
judicial races starting with the 2016 elections; the governor had issued a veto
on HB 2010 previously not on the merits but due to typographical and reference errors in the bil
on HB 2010 previously not
on the merits but due to typographical and reference errors in the bil
on the merits but due to typographical and reference
errors in the bill.
It is alleged by the defendant in
error in this case that the plea to the jurisdiction was a sufficient plea; that it shows,
on inspection of its allegations, confessed by the demurrer, that the plaintiff was not a citizen of the State of Missouri; that, upon this record, it must appear to this court that the case was not within the
judicial power of the United States as defined and granted by the Constitution, because it was not a suit by a citizen of one State against a citizen of another State.
A few years ago, the American Tort Reform Assocation named West Virginia a so - called «
judicial helllhole», in fact # 3 «hellhole» based
on a flagrant
error.
Should arbitrators be free from
judicial control based
on legal
errors, in order to encourage the freedom to arbitrate?
It strikes down the right of the Workers» Compensation Appeal Tribunal (WCAT) to reconsider its own decisions
on the basis of jurisdictional
error, and it potentially broadens the scope of
judicial review, to permit reviewing judges to re-weigh the evidence that was before the tribunal.
Accordingly,
on an appeal from a
judicial decision, the interpretation of a non-standard form contract is normally reviewable only for palpable and overriding
error unless there is an extricable question of law.
Judicial adventurism in Anisminic paved the way for Racal, where Lord Diplock, in obiter dicta, misinterpreted Anisminic to find that an administrative decision based
on an
error of law is automatically a nullity.
If it may be thought that any
error was entailed in the Court's perception of jurisdiction, such an apprehension by itself, would not justify the reversal of the Macharia Ruling, a decision which, as we must take
judicial notice, will have established itself as a mark of certainty and predictability in the law,...
on the basis of which numbers of people will have figured out their rights and expectations.