These factors include state - funded «taste training» in preschools, warnings
on junk food advertising, bans on school junk food sales and of course societal value placed on French food culture.
A food act in Peru introducing mandatory front of pack warnings for pre-packaged foods high in sugar, salt and fat and restrictions
on junk food advertising to children and young people
If you look at the anti-obesity policy recommendations of almost every leading public health organization, the list invariably includes a ban
on junk food advertising directed at children.
Money spent last year
on junk food advertising in the UK far outweighs the amount Government is able to spend on healthy eating campaigns, leading to an unbalanced environment pushing us towards unhealthy choices, according to new analysis by the Obesity Health Alliance (OHA).
Not exact matches
But the campaign to dampen appetites for fat, sugar and salt, particularly among children, drew a limp response from the Australian Communications and Media Authority
on junk -
food television
advertising.
Even if measures supported by the best available evidence (such as traffic light labelling
on the front - of -
food packaging and removing
advertising junk food to children between 6 am and 9 pm as recommended in the Government's response to the National Preventative Health Taskforce) are implemented, regulation is no panacea.
The bargaining process often sees businesses taking some steps to appease government and public demands, such as putting labels
on food, but not ones that communicate clearly and effectively, or a voluntary (and small) reduction in television
advertising of
junk food to children.
Recent polling shows that 74 per cent of the UK public back a ban
on advertising junk food on TV before 9 pm.
The main criticisms of the government's measures have largely centred
on the voluntary action by the
food and drink industry and the absence of any restrictions
on junk food marketing and
advertising.
[63] They cite the cases of Sweden, Norway and Quebec as instances where there is inconclusive evidence that bans have been successful (see the section later in this paper
on what actions other countries have taken in relation to
junk food advertising for more explanation of the regime in place in these countries).
Another argument against the banning of
junk food advertising to children claims that assertions about causal influences of
food advertising on children's diets and weight are flawed because they do not take into consideration other risk factors.
provide advertisers with an option to pay a 1.5 per cent levy
on alcohol and
junk food advertising if they did not choose to include the health information themselves
The government's measures, centred
on the sugar tax announced by George Osborne in March, rely
on voluntary action by the
food and drink industry and are shorn of any restrictions
on junk food marketing and
advertising.
And there are also many, many things we could be doing to encourage children's acceptance of healthier school meals: imposing meaningful restrictions
on children's
junk food advertising; requiring
food education in schools — not just nutrition education, but offering kids a real understanding of our
food system, and overtly inoculating them against the allure of hyper - processed and fast
food; teaching all children basic cooking skills; getting more gardens into schools; encouraging restaurants to ditch the standard breaded - and - fried children's menu; imposing taxes
on soda (and even
junk food); improving
food access; and so much more.
In today's New York Times, Jane Brody reports
on the recently released results of the CHildhood Obesity Cost - Effectiveness Study (aka «CHOICES»), which examined various possible approaches to curbing childhood obesity and chose two as most likely to help: the imposition of taxes
on sugary beverages and curbs
on children's
junk food advertising, both measures long supported here
on The Lunch Tray.
In 2012, Disney banned
junk food advertising on all of its child - targeted TV and radio platforms.
Posted in Big
Food, Child Nutrition, Food Law, Food Policy, Industry Tactics, Marketing to Children, Public Health Tagged: advertising regulation, Big Food, child nutrition, childhood obesity, fast food, junk food, Let's Move, targeted marketing Michele on Google + View / Add Comments
Food, Child Nutrition,
Food Law, Food Policy, Industry Tactics, Marketing to Children, Public Health Tagged: advertising regulation, Big Food, child nutrition, childhood obesity, fast food, junk food, Let's Move, targeted marketing Michele on Google + View / Add Comments
Food Law,
Food Policy, Industry Tactics, Marketing to Children, Public Health Tagged: advertising regulation, Big Food, child nutrition, childhood obesity, fast food, junk food, Let's Move, targeted marketing Michele on Google + View / Add Comments
Food Policy, Industry Tactics, Marketing to Children, Public Health Tagged:
advertising regulation, Big
Food, child nutrition, childhood obesity, fast food, junk food, Let's Move, targeted marketing Michele on Google + View / Add Comments
Food, child nutrition, childhood obesity, fast
food, junk food, Let's Move, targeted marketing Michele on Google + View / Add Comments
food,
junk food, Let's Move, targeted marketing Michele on Google + View / Add Comments
food, Let's Move, targeted marketing Michele
on Google + View / Add Comments (0)
Just think about it: if you were trying to balance a very tight budget in an operation which lives or dies based
on how well students accept your
food, and if many (sometimes, the vast majority) of those students came from homes in which nutritionally balanced, home cooked meals are far from the norm, and if the
food industry was bombarding those kids with almost $ 2 billion a year in
advertising promoting
junk food and fast
food, and if you had no money of your own for nutrition education to even begin to counter those messages, and if some of those kids also had the option of going off campus to a 7 - 11 or grabbing a donut and chips from a PTA fundraising table set up down the hall, wouldn't you, too, be at least a tiny bit tempted to ramp up the white flour pasta, pizza and fries and ditch the tasteless, low - sodium green beans?
Posted in Big
Food, Food Policy, Marketing to Children Tagged: advertising regulation, American Dietetic Association, deceptive health claims, FDA, Frito - Lay, GMO labeling, junk food, Monsanto, natural, PepsiCo Michele on Google + View / Add Comments
Food,
Food Policy, Marketing to Children Tagged: advertising regulation, American Dietetic Association, deceptive health claims, FDA, Frito - Lay, GMO labeling, junk food, Monsanto, natural, PepsiCo Michele on Google + View / Add Comments
Food Policy, Marketing to Children Tagged:
advertising regulation, American Dietetic Association, deceptive health claims, FDA, Frito - Lay, GMO labeling,
junk food, Monsanto, natural, PepsiCo Michele on Google + View / Add Comments
food, Monsanto, natural, PepsiCo Michele
on Google + View / Add Comments (9)
Posted in Big
Food, Child Nutrition, Food Policy, Industry Tactics, Marketing to Children Tagged: advertising regulation, Congress, junk food, lobbying, nutrition labeling, Obama, politics, school food policy, targeted marketing, voluntary self - regulation Michele on Google + View / Add Comments
Food, Child Nutrition,
Food Policy, Industry Tactics, Marketing to Children Tagged: advertising regulation, Congress, junk food, lobbying, nutrition labeling, Obama, politics, school food policy, targeted marketing, voluntary self - regulation Michele on Google + View / Add Comments
Food Policy, Industry Tactics, Marketing to Children Tagged:
advertising regulation, Congress,
junk food, lobbying, nutrition labeling, Obama, politics, school food policy, targeted marketing, voluntary self - regulation Michele on Google + View / Add Comments
food, lobbying, nutrition labeling, Obama, politics, school
food policy, targeted marketing, voluntary self - regulation Michele on Google + View / Add Comments
food policy, targeted marketing, voluntary self - regulation Michele
on Google + View / Add Comments (31)
Junk food advertising should be banned
on all television programmes aimed at children under the age of 16, the broadcasting watchdog has said.
Campaigners were left disappointed when the plan published last August stopped short of a hoped - for crackdown
on junk food deals and
advertising.
Caroline Cerny, Obesity Health Alliance Lead, said: «The rules to protect children from
junk food advertising on TV are ten years old.
On January 1, the British government put limits on junk - food advertising during shows aimed at children under the age of 16, and by 2009, they will become stricte
On January 1, the British government put limits
on junk - food advertising during shows aimed at children under the age of 16, and by 2009, they will become stricte
on junk -
food advertising during shows aimed at children under the age of 16, and by 2009, they will become stricter.
Hence the forceful objections by the
food industry to the proposals to place limits
on the TV
advertising of so called «
junk food» to children.
Ali plans to tweet
on current legal issues in the
food environment — should we restrict
junk food advertising to children, tax or ban unhealthy
foods and drinks, put nutrition info
on menus and make health stars mandatory in supermarkets?