This approach is more ethical than psychological or theological, and its focus is not on the free personality or
on justification by faith, but on the movement from the cloister to the world.
It is especially interesting that Luther with his sense of the persistence of sin in the redeemed, and his absolute reliance
on justification by faith, still makes a rather neat distinction between those who are truly Christian and those who are not.
The Roman Catholic confessional is built upon the realization of continuing sin, and the Protestant emphasis
on justification by faith, though rightly stressing the lifting of the burden of sin by God's act, still is forced to recognize the sinning of the redeemed.
A consensus
on justification by faith alone is said to be missing.
The emphasis
on justification by faith became common coin among the Reformers and their confessions.
Secondly, we have come to significant agreement (although surely with differences remaining) on profound theological issues:
on our justification by faith through grace in Jesus Christ; on the proper relationship between Scripture and tradition; on the communion of saints and the universal call to holiness; and on the role of Mary in the life of the Christian and of the church.
My Lutheran friend is pleased that Catholics and Lutherans can approve a common statement
on justification by faith, but «doctrinal agreement turns out to be sheer abstraction apart from a concrete vision of the shape of the Life we are saved to live.»
Not exact matches
Concerning «getting pearls of wisdom» from research and review of original documents posted
on the Internet, versus doctrinal
justifications by a specific denomination which begin with enamored language, such as «most convincingly», «sublime article», «holy Christian
faith», «believe and confess»....
The Protestant evangelical primacy of
justification by faith, coupled with an overemphasis
on discontinuity between the covenants, has more often than not resulted in the confusion of soteriological and ethical categories, in the end breeding among evangelicals a moral mindset devoid of both foundations and fiber.
Building
on the emphasis
on the individual in pietism, moving through Kant, and in this century appropriating existentialism, Lutheranism has too frequently tried to construct in the private experience of
justification an area for
faith that can not be touched
by the challenges of modernity.
But if believing results in
justification (as Rom 4:4 - 5 and Rom 10:10 a clearly show), then how could calling
on the Lord and confessing with your mouth also result in
justification since such a person is already justified
by faith alone?
Phillip Cary paraphrases point five of the preamble to the Joint Declaration
on the Doctrine of
Justification when he states that the signatories reached a «theological consensus that Luther's doctrine of justification by faith alone need not be Church - div
Justification when he states that the signatories reached a «theological consensus that Luther's doctrine of
justification by faith alone need not be Church - div
justification by faith alone need not be Church - dividing.»
If one really believes in
justification by faith alone, differences over other matters — the real presence in the Eucharist, apostolic ministry, the indissolubility of marriage, the ordination of women, and
on and
on — make no difference.
Adamant about the centrality of
justification by faith through grace, we sometimes verge
on a perverse kind of theological works - righteousness.
His first sermon was
on «
Justification by Faith.»
Confessional Lutherans rightly insist
on the centrality of the doctrine of
justification by grace alone through
faith alone because of Christ alone.
Reumann outlines the historical hardening of theological categories between Lutherans and Catholics arising out of the Reformation doctrine of
justification by faith, and the convergence toward a common understanding
on justification and related doctrines through Lutheran - Catholic dialogues over the past thirty years.
Here I side with John Howard Yoder against the view prevalent among social ethicists today that the early church found Jesus» sociopolitical ethics, including his teaching
on peace, irrelevant and was interested in his life, death, and resurrection only as the basis for
justification by faith; that whatever ethics the church taught was drawn from Hellenistic culture, particularly Stoicism.
«11 A taste for opposing John the mystic to Paul the apostle of
justification by faith leads to neglect of this other kind of «juridical» thought, this other problem of
justification which derives its coherence from this horizon of the great trial
on which all theology of testimony is projected.
And it was this doctrine, in turn based
on the doctrine of
justification by faith, which made it possible for Luther and Calvin to say what it means to live the Christian life of service to the God of love in the midst of the tragic necessities of this world.16
According to the statement, there is no consensus
on justification through the word of God and «
by faith alone,» no consensus
on the certitude of
faith concerning our salvation, no consensus
on the continuing sinfulness of the justified, nor
on the importance of good works for our salvation, nor
on the function of the doctrine of
justification as criterion of the entire life and doctrine of the church.
As Timothy George wrote in his introduction to «The Gift of Salvation» in the December 1997 issue of Christianity Today: «We rejoice that our Roman Catholic interlocutors have been able to agree with us that the doctrine of
justification set forth in this document agrees with what the Reformers meant
by justification by faith alone (sola fide)... [But] this still does not resolve all the differences between our two traditions
on this crucial matter.»
Being a Reformed (Calvinist) theologian of considerable earnestness, McGrath's essay understandably dwells at length
on the formula «
justification by faith alone,» and related questions about, for instance, the connection between
justification and sanctification.
Gorringe's chapter
on portraiture culminates with Rembrandt, whose faces betray «an astonishing account of the doctrine of
justification by faith.»
Justification in the sight of man
by way of sanctification or becoming ever more like Christ is a process which has the potential of saving others.; this
by exemplifying through
faith in action that
faith alone in the blood of Christ alone saves you, this
on the hope of attracting believers from
faith to
faith in action and unbelievers first to
faith and salvation and then to
faith in action, paying it forward, growing His Kingdom.
He was so insistent
on justification by grace alone through
faith alone in Christ alone, that he had trouble reconciling these truths with the teachings of James.
In the text
on translation Luther defended his addition of the word «alone» to St Paul's famous definition of
justification by faith.
Definitions
on dogma ruled out specific Protestant positions, such as
justification by faith alone and the priesthood of all believers.
The SCC determined that employers are required to act in good
faith towards their employees and, unless explicitly authorized
by the employment contract, employers can not place employees
on leave, even if paid, without providing legitimate business
justification.