Sentences with phrase «on key scientific issues»
No matter how AAAS members are categorized, their views starkly differ from the public's on key scientific issues such as global warming and its causes, human evolution, vaccination strategies and the safety of eating genetically modified foods or foods grown with pesticides.
http://www.pewinternet.org/
In collaboration with journalists, scientists and press officers, the SMC has produced a series of «briefing notes» on key scientific issues which provide at - a-glance summaries of controversial topics.
Not exact matches
Clearly informed by IPCC and other scientific studies, considerable progress has been made on the key issues of adaptation, avoided deforestation, technology transfers and a more geographically and sectorally balanced Clean Development Mechanism.
The ceremony is part of Kavli Prize Week - a week of special programs that celebrate extraordinary achievements in science, educate the public on important scientific advances, and bring together distinguished members of the international community to discuss key global issues in science and science policy.
Nearly a year after NASA climatologist James Hansen accused federal officials of censoring his views on global warming, scientific freedom is shaping up as a key issue for the next Congress, Environment & Energy Daily reported in its # 1 story... Continue reading →
A key goal of the priority program is to reduce the large uncertainties in our current understanding of CE impacts on the environment, politics, and society so as to create a scientific basis for a responsible approach to the issue CE.
Lisbon conference, discussions of scientific method, other reasons for limiting emissions and so on, its all total waste of time, its nothing to do with the key issue.
Jones and a collaborator have been accused by a climate change sceptic and researcher of scientific fraud for attempting to suppress data that could cast doubt on a key 1990 study on the effect of cities on warming â $ «a hotly contested issue.
The US Chamber of Commerce has been a key part of the corporate effort to block federal action on climate change and undermine the scientific consensus on the issue.
One of the most troubling aspects of the leaked Heartland Institute documents was the revelation that they were planning to create a school curriculum for K - 12 students that «that shows that the topic of climate change is controversial and uncertain — two key points that are effective at dissuading teachers from teaching science» indicates that there is scientific controversy on the core issues of anthropogenic climate change (*).
My response is primarily designed to correct their misleading description of my own research; but it also is directed more broadly at their attempt to discredit scientists and scientific research on climate change.1 I have identified six key issues that are raised in the article, and I provide commentary about their substance and accuracy.
The topics will include a review of 2016 talc verdicts, the historic role of government regulatory bodies, the plaintiff and defense position on key scientific and medical causation issues, and an inside evaluation from the hottest and most rapidly emerging jurisdictions.