Sentences with phrase «on known physics»

The null hypothesis should be based on known physics rather than denial of it.

I would like to see this evidence that models just based on known physics «model climate and paleoclimate rather well».

It basically builds on known physics that we pretty much understand.

Not exact matches

based on the laws of physics, we know that atoms form molecules.

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

Also, I never proposed that randomness created anything (I only argued that some simple set of laws of physics are all that need be behind the designs of nature that we observe), so I don't know why you are going on about randomness in your last few sentences.

They go back many thousands of years and are based (you'll be sorry to know) on pure logic, physics, or some combination of the two.

In all honesty probably.04 % or less of the human population really understands Quantum Physics on a basic level, yet when someone claims to know it people agree with whatever they say as fact.

``... the future of Christian philosophy will therefore depend on the existence or absence of theologians equipped with scientific training, no doubt limited but genuine and, within its own limits, sufficient for them to follow with understanding such lofty dialogues not only in mathematics and physics but also in biology and wherever the knowledge of nature reaches the level of demonstration.»

By the way: Even the best physics people and experts on the topic of time don't know exactly what time is.

Changes of clocks and rulers were already well known in physics due to temperature and pressure and so on.

Physics - lite @ CN77 & Andrew Andrew's Quote «It's not all that pointless, see while you would never be convinced that your bronze age mythological beliefs about the creation of the universe are wrong, since I can rebut (with peer reviewed journal articles no less) any claim you make, in rather stunning detail, those who are not so well versed on the subject who read the dialogue could be swayed to the side of science.

I am not claiming you are elitist... but at the same time... you should know better... not every Christian is equipped to handle deep theological questioning, in the same way that not every atheist can give a dissertation on quantum physics.

He can not distinguish questions regarding the existence of the universe from questions regarding its physical origin; he does not grasp how assertions regarding the absolute must logically differ from assertions regarding contingent beings; he does not know the differences between truths of reason and empirical facts; he has no concept of ontology, in contradistinction to, say, physics or evolutionary biology; he does not understand how assertions regarding transcendental perfections differ from assertions regarding maximum magnitude; he clumsily imagines that the idea of God is susceptible to the same argument from infinite regress traditionally advanced against materialism; he does not understand what the metaphysical concept of simplicity entails; and on and on.

If so you know a bit a physics and I was wondering what your take is on this: «We conclude that the universe is fine - tuned for the existence of life.

As a result, the scope of physics today is phenomena which is quantifiable, or measurable, and no longer focuses on material bodies from the point of view of being.

Sue, since you have a doctorate in Physics (would love to know who was on your dissertation board) please explain to Richard (the one that keeps cheerleading with no valuable inputs of his own) how Hawking's calculation of monkey's eventually typing out a Shakespear sonnet would take a prohibitive time — longer than the known universe and longer than the universe would last... hint you can google it too

The example Barr considered was human consciousness, focusing on Roger Penrose's argument that the mind can not be explained by currently known laws of physics.

You do not know if our physical existence is «material» as you would claim (99 % + of what we stand on is not solid and we have developed a body of physics to explain density and such).

Those laws of physics are infallible, and I for one am grateful that they operate as they do because life as we know it depends on it.

As physics students will know well, the slight differences in path length for waves superposing cause interference patterns, rather like the rainbow effect on a patch of oil on the road or the colours formed by the surface of a DVD.

Using the known laws of physics I can't prove that naturally the pen on the floor moved to top of my desk, but although I lack proof I can reasonable belief that someone or thing did move it from the floor up to the desk.

Chen Wang, postdoctoral associate in Yale's department of applied physics and physics and the author of a new study on the topic, told HowStuffWorks, «Not only does the [Schrödinger's] cat «paradox» no longer feel absurd conceptually to physicists [but] even more exotic quantum states are becoming commonplace and attainable.»

Leon Lederman, the well - know physicist in his book on the history of particle physics, The God Particle, (GP 175) expresses the unavoidable finitude as a limit of knowledge expressed by what Max Planck called the «quantum of action,» now known as Planck's Constant: «Heisenberg announced that our simultaneous knowledge of a particle's location and its motion is limited and the combined uncertainty of these two properties must exceed... nothing other than Planck's constant, b...

PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.

that their religion is flawed somehow... and when questioned why they try to push their ideas on everybody else, they get frustrated and say that it's the Religious ones that push their ideas on people... NOT THEM... That's funny because i have about 1000 comments on this thread that state the opposite... Atheist's i see on this post appear to fall into that category of people that need to try and convince others to believe what they do because they're not sure in their own beliefs... They know that believing in the big bang theory or other similar theories takes as much faith as any religion has to offer... and when pinned down to the facts that By the laws of physics... the big bang couldn't happen....

Oh do nt forget that to anyone who actually knows something about the laws of physics and metallurgy, that in order to eliminate a large variance in repeatability, you will have to by law, dictate the material, and properties of the components for the firing pins, shell casings and primers for every single firearm made (designers and manufacturers set these material properties and types during design based on use and cost), since this or any other law does not, and it is so easy to beat, any claim to this being smart is f# # $ % $ # stupid.

Sydney Schreppler, a postdoctoral fellow in physics at University of California, Berkeley, seeks to hire a female graduate student mentee to contribute to her work on circuits that mimic the behavior of the world's smallest particles, known as superconducting qubits.

He had been musing over the arrow of time as far back as graduate school in the late 1980s, when he published papers on the feasibility of time travel using known physics.

Their findings shed new light on the physics of black holes with the first laboratory evidence of the phenomenon known as the superradiance, achieved using water and a generator to create waves.

His colleagues have publicly stated his writing children's books on science had an adverse effect on his scientific reputation, and people could not take him seriously when he and his colleagues proposed that there should be a cosmic background radiation, which we now know to be one of the greatest discoveries of 20th - century physics.

No one person could already know all the physics discussed on the show, so I wind up learning a lot.

But in a grid, this changes since you no longer have a spacetime continuum, and the laws of physics would depend on direction.

Research on graphene, the most well - known van der Waals material, earned the Nobel Prize in physics in 2010.

These days Einstein's once - lonely quest engages thousands of physicists around the world, most of them working on an ambitious physics framework known as string theory.

D'Espagnat, 87, is a professor emeritus of theoretical physics at the University of Paris - Sud, and is known for his work on quantum mechanics.

Inspired by a high school physics teacher, she applied to MIT and chose to live in the «stereotypically geeky» Random Hall, perhaps best known as the place where you can click on student - designed Web sites to check whether the bathrooms or washing machines are unoccupied.

«We didn't know this large magnitude of «negative magnetoresistance» was possible,» said Qiang Li, a physicist and head of the advanced energy materials group in the department and a co-author on a paper describing these results just published in the journal Nature Physics.

The method, which relies on «fuzziness,» proved to be as robust as the well - known and regularly used sample entropy (SampEn) method but with the advantage of offering greater detail than sample entropy The findings have been published in Medical Engineering and Physics.

Some of our understanding of time is based on logic and the known laws of physics, but some of it is based purely on convenience and reasonable - sounding assumptions.

After years of watching engineers model traffic flow with advanced physics to alleviate jams, a team of urban planners called Shared Space have adopted a simple solution based on a zoological concept known as the risk compensation effect.

A proposed pathway to construct quantum computers may be the outcome of research by a University of Oklahoma physics team that has created a new molecule based on the interaction between a highly - excited type of atom known as a Rydberg atom and a ground - state atom.

When the time came to go to university, she says, «I really didn't know what to do, and then, on a whim, I just decided, «OK, let's try physics.»»

Story 4: Andre Geim, who won the Nobel Prize on Physics on October 5th, is the first laureate that we know of to have co-authored a paper with a hamster.

SUPERSYMMETRY PREDICTION In «Supersymmetry and the Crisis in Physics,» Joseph Lykken and Maria Spiropulu discuss hopes that evidence of supersymmetry, which proposes that all known particles have hidden superpartners, will be found at CERN's Large Hadron Collider within a year's time — and the effects on physics as a whole if it Physics,» Joseph Lykken and Maria Spiropulu discuss hopes that evidence of supersymmetry, which proposes that all known particles have hidden superpartners, will be found at CERN's Large Hadron Collider within a year's time — and the effects on physics as a whole if it physics as a whole if it is not.

In 1964, physicist John Bell took on this seeming disparity between classical physics and quantum mechanics, stating that if the universe is based on classical physics, the measurement of one entangled particle should not affect the measurement of the other — a theory, known as locality, in which there is a limit to how correlated two particles can be.

The scientists took quantum information theory, which is based on abstract mathematical systems, and applied it to condensed matter physics, a well - explored field with many known laws and experiments.

Leonard Susskind, Information Station Institution: Stanford University Year: 2008 Known for: Co-creating string theory Idea: In his book The Black Hole War, Susskind says quantum physics dictates that information remains on the black hole's edge, even while the object falls in.

But on the physics one I thought no, it's funnier to let it go.

It helps to know some basic physics to approach his lectures, but he has such a luminous mind and is so good with metaphor that you can grasp a fair amount about what's going on in modern physics without formal understanding of complex math, up to a point.»