Wouldn't it be more accurate to state that the scientists that work on these problems, create models, and work
on model validation don't come here much?
Try reading the chapter
on model validation in AR5 — you'll never see a more comprehensive critique (if by «comprehensive» one means «specific, serious and constructive»).
Not exact matches
After an extensive content
validation process, including expert panel review by all Steering Committee members and all work group members, the final instrument included 130 core items that collected information
on demographics, access to maternity care, preferences for
model of care, maternal and newborn outcomes, knowledge of midwifery care, and experience of care including the process of decision - making.
Based
on their findings, they urge that «mosquito saliva and enhancing antibodies thus need to be considered when developing vaccines and drugs against dengue,» and specifically suggest that «animal
models of dengue and pre-clinical
validation of dengue vaccine candidates should be evaluated in the combined presence of mosquito saliva and enhancing antibodies.»
The new technique could provide a much - needed experimental
validation of frequently used computational
models, as well as a means of investigating the effect of new battery materials and additives
on lithium metal plating.
Any results that are reported to constitute a blinded, independent
validation of a statistical
model (or mathematical classifier or predictor) must be accompanied by a detailed explanation that includes: 1) specification of the exact «locked down» form of the
model, including all data processing steps, algorithm for calculating the
model output, and any cutpoints that might be applied to the
model output for final classification, 2) date
on which the
model or predictor was fully locked down in exactly the form described, 3) name of the individual (s) who maintained the blinded data and oversaw the evaluation (e.g., honest broker), 4) statement of assurance that no modifications, additions, or exclusion were made to the
validation data set from the point at which the
model was locked down and that neither the
validation data nor any subset of it had ever been used to assess or refine the
model being tested
The
models» accuracy was tested
on 150 cases that were excluded from the training and
validation datasets.
They also used tenfold cross
validation to train the
models for responsiveness, and then tested these
on the
validation samples as well.
The researchers also tested their prediction
models on the
validation set, and this resulted in ROC (receiver operating characteristic) plot points with an AUC (area under the curve) of 91.6 percent for general responsiveness, 89.7 percent for TNFi response and 85.7 percent for rituximab response.
IDMIT will contribute 1) To the development and
validation of assays based
on flow cytometry and mass cytometry for the evaluation of immune responses in humans and animal
models; these tools will be particularly relevant for the identification of signatures of vaccine efficacy; 2) To the animal
model platform, in particularly by providing access to NHP
models and to new technologies for in vivo imaging infections and host responses; 3) To networking activities, in particular by organising a workshop
on in vivo imaging.
Our goal is to help scientists who want to use this technology for gene editing by summarizing current advances
on many technical aspects, from the RNA guide optimized design to the genotyping analysis and the
validation of the newly generated
models.
I can read any peer - reviewed article I like
on modern climate
models, but until I go through much of the process of building, running,
validation, discussing with colleagues how they solved particular wrinkles etc of some
models, I am unlikely to fully comprehend climate
modelling as a skilled craft.
Position Description: The University of Vigo offers a Research Position in Vigo (Spain) to work with the Laboratory of Remote Sensing and GIS
on the H2020 research project CoastObs in
validation of Sentinel 3 data in order to provide information about the relationship between environmental conditions in HABs blooms and develop of local CASE 2 chl - a
models.
The ICS is a large - scale facility open to the community that ensures the generation of mouse
models à la carte, the
validation of genetic
models, the expansion and preservation and distribution of
models with the housing department, and offers in its phenotyping department a series of standardized functional analysis of mouse
models that can be performed in a comprehensive pipeline or
on demand, as well as for more specialized studies, that cover the major functions and key physiological systems.
Once each tissue
model is fitted
on the training set with 3 - repeat -5-fold cross
validation, we calculate the p - value of the F - test (Supplementary Fig. 28), R2 and slope (not shown) for the regression of the predicted tissue PMI in the test set versus the real tissue PMI.
To this end, for each cohort (pre-mortem and postmortem), we partitioned the data into training and testing datasets, fitted the
model on the training data with 3 - repeat -5-fold cross
validation, performed the predictions
on the test set and then obtained the regression statistics of real vs. predicted Blood PMI.
Based
on their success to date in
models of glaucoma, the researchers are making significant steps toward moving into human testing and
validation of a biomarker for clinical use.
The
validation of the procedure was done
on the data extracted from simulated roots (see Appendix Text: Section S1.D) and is shown in Appendix Figs S5 — S7 for each
model.
This section invites manuscripts describing (a) Linkage, association, substitution or positional mapping and epigenetic studies in any species; (b)
Validation studies of candidate genes using genetically - engineered mutant
model organisms; (c) Studies focused
on epistatis and gene - environment interactions; (d) Analysis of the functional implications of genomic sequence variation and aim to attach physiological or pharmacogenomic relevance to alterations in genes or proteins; (e) Studies of DNA copy number variants, non-coding RNA, genome deletions, insertions, duplications and other single nucleotide polymorphisms and their relevance to physiology or pharmacology in humans or
model organisms, in vitro or in vivo; and (f) Theoretical approaches to analysis of sequence variation.
Godwin's findings are a
validation of the MDI Biological Laboratory's unique research approach, which is focused
on studying regeneration in a diverse range of animal
models with the goal of gaining insight into how to trigger dormant genetic pathways for regeneration in humans.
But what I found most helpful was it's approach
on how to sort through your own personal emotional baggage, boost self - esteem through personal
validation, map out both good and bad patterns in finding someone, and creating a written
model for not just your ideal partner, but the ideal you.
Currently, he is working
on contrasting between state growth
model approaches and developing new gap trend and growth metrics for cross-test comparison and
validation.
«One of the largest
validation studies ever conducted
on [the] observation framework shows that the Marzano
model's research - based structure is correlated with state VAMs.»
One of the largest
validation studies ever conducted
on an observation framework shows that the Marzano
model's research - based structure is correlated with state VAMs.
• A common language of instruction • Lists of possible evidences for each element • Identical scales: «not using» to «innovating» • An extensive research base for the Marzano
models •
Validation from use in other schools • A focus
on common learning goals
SRI Education evaluated NTC's Investing in Innovation (i3)
Validation grant to measure the impact of NTC's new teacher induction
model on teacher retention, teacher practice, and student achievement.
The upgraded Marzano Focused Teacher Evaluation
Model streamlines current research and
validation studies — zeroing in
on 23 essential teacher competencies for improved clarity, efficiency, and effectiveness.
Gobel went
on to say this «final
validation» issue only deals with the diesel
models.
In an industry that many still perceive as having a chip
on its shoulder towards self - publishing and digital publishing, the atmosphere was very welcoming of those who choose to forgo the traditional
model, demonstrating the
validation and respect that indie publishing and its technology have earned in recent years.
In the future, we'll probably have a dedicated EPUB 3
validation tool (
modeled somewhat
on epubcheck, although with quite a few changes, I hope), but I'd like to start working today.
I understand the argument that past projections are based
on estimated future forcings which can change, but this amounts to the same things as tuning hindcasts and declaring matching a hindcast to observations as a
validation of your
model.
The
validation of the MAR
model (output of which is plotted above), but also that of e.g. the RACMO
model is not based solely
on the K transect data.
Bill, your view
on the
validation and applicability of regional climate
modelling over Greenland is a bit too simplistic.
I can read any peer - reviewed article I like
on modern climate
models, but until I go through much of the process of building, running,
validation, discussing with colleagues how they solved particular wrinkles etc of some
models, I am unlikely to fully comprehend climate
modelling as a skilled craft.
Climate
models have passed a broad range of
validation tests — e.g. a 30 - year warming trend, response to perturbations like ENSO and volcanic eruptions...
On the other hand, in a statistical
model, parameters of the
model are determined by a fit to the
model.
Nice, firstly, to have the
validation that I'm
on the right track there, and second, to have some good supporting information — plus the updated
models / obs graph!
For noisy systems like climate, the
validation is based
on many realizations of the
model.
I agree that a priori we can't assume that the high end simulations will fall by the wayside once more
validation is done, but that is my hunch (based
on model valdiation that we perform at GISS and my own experience with paleo - climate
modelling).
Are ocean
models so robustly based
on first principles that they can be trusted without
validation against sound observations over the time scales of interest?
How much work is done
on the
validation of the
models?
The vast wealth of scientific work
on validation of
models appears to be ignored in the book — William]
The structural uncertainty represents the uncertainty inherent in the DNDC
model and is set using independent
validation data (directly measured daily methane fluxes
on benchmark sites) available at the time of methodology publication.
Those numbers were based
on crude climate
models whose validity had never been tested by observations — and even today, there remains no
validation for the climate
models that are at the heart of most claims of climate catastrophe.
The key implication of this rule in terms of
modelling is that no
model can be trusted and used before formal
validation and rescaling
on the basis of test experiences.
Skepticalscience is a perfect example and their attempt to justify
validation of the
models begins with an attack
on Freeman Dyson's observation that,
However, when a
validation was performed
on a similar analysis for which the regression
model was calibrated with a subset of the data, and the remaining data were used for
validation, it became apparent that
models based
on the factors that McKitrick & Michaels used had no skill (i.e. were not able to reproduce the independent data).
I'm sure the continuous evaluation flavor of
validation is sufficient for scientific uses of the
model, but I'm equally convinced that it is insufficient for the decision support tasks currently being foisted
on these tools by the mainstream policy advocates.
Challenges to
model validation occur if controlled experiments can not be performed
on the system (e.g. there is one historic time series) or the
model is not deterministic; each of these conditions imply that the
model can not be falsified.
Model validation strategies depend on the intended application of the m
Model validation strategies depend
on the intended application of the
modelmodel.
Oreskes (1998) argues for
model evaluation (not
validation), whereby
model quality can be evaluated
on the basis of the underlying scientific principles, quantity and quality of input parameters, the ability of a
model to reproduce independent empirical data.