Sentences with phrase «on moral choices»

I think it depends on the moral choices and the integrity that you have.

I'm not going to lecture you on your moral choice, except to point out that you did actually make one.

Not exact matches

Since the book is a key reason my kids were able to go to the colleges of their choice, the moral seems clear to me: Get as much input from your customers as you can and act on it.

That's the real truth, and that's why people are fascinated by other ways which have remained less disturbed by the Gospel that really grips this society, which is that there should be no constraint on individual consumer choice in goods or morals.

2) Make it clear in public that if you don't like the rock and roll, there are plenty of other churches, with hints that this decision is a moral choice which reflects badly on you, not the community.

Gilligan based her research on women's approaches to situations of moral choice.

If they were so «moral» on their own, wouldn't they take the high road and accept that this person has made a different choice than they have.

The best single article I've seen on the moral case for parental choice in education is «School Choice as Simple Justice,» published in First Things (April 1992) and written by Prof. John Coons of the law school of the University of California, Berchoice in education is «School Choice as Simple Justice,» published in First Things (April 1992) and written by Prof. John Coons of the law school of the University of California, BerChoice as Simple Justice,» published in First Things (April 1992) and written by Prof. John Coons of the law school of the University of California, Berkeley.

In ignoring Augustine's reflections on virtue in On Free Choice of the Will, the contemporary church misses an indispensable resource for reconstituting moral visioon virtue in On Free Choice of the Will, the contemporary church misses an indispensable resource for reconstituting moral visioOn Free Choice of the Will, the contemporary church misses an indispensable resource for reconstituting moral vision.

If we out right refuse to limit your rights, make laws to take away choices and push what we feel is moral on to you, why can't you do the same for us?

I think I'm too simple in my thinking that; if you don't like it, DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see...

As a result, parents would be able to pass on their moral commitments through schools of their choice.

Not all Wesleyans would agree on whether abortion is ever the most moral choice, and if not whether it should be outlawed or left to the judgment of those most intimately involved.

The awful moral choice forced on Senator Kerrey is a commonplace aspect of war, not understood at all by professors and editorial writers who imagine, with obscene hubris, that they could avoid the guilt feelings associated with combat.

Intellectual and esthetic responsibility, right choice of work and recreation, conservation of natural and human resources, and so on are all moral issues.

On the other hand, the chief problem with the view of the new reformers is that it fails to recognize that a sexual self, liberated from undertakings that have a moral claim upon it prior to any of its particular intentions and choices, has no satisfactory way to make moral judgments about what it intends, chooses, promises, and then undertakes.

As I understand it, this is the moral challenge for those on the side of «choice.»

First, with so much data to consider and so many goods to be balanced, those who stand outside the decision are in no position to pronounce on the individual moral culpability of parents who make these choices.

I should further state that all of the moral teachings of the Qur «an are based on the notion of moral responsibility, which entails the freedom of choice.

And some gay people feel that gay sex is wrong (and many have at some point in their lives), so they are clearly capable of taking a moral stand on the issue (without the physical components of their brains being any different than someone who makes a different choice).

The big issue as I see it, the one I identified in my first comment, is the pair of notions that (1) we can choose to believe or choose to disbelieve in certain religious ideas and that (2) this choice is a moral triumph or a moral failure that is rewarded with heaven or punished with hell depending on how we choose.

Again, the mother's freedom of choice must be allowed to prevail on a moral and legal level.

The filth on TV, in movies, on You Tube, on the internet, and in music is a trap for those that have turned their hearts away from the morals and values that help people make the right choices in life.

(2) Freedom of choice should be allowed in those matters on which a plurality of views are held — views based on well - articulated principles rooted in cultural tradition or widely recognized moral, philosophical and religious beliefs.

In every sphere, physical no less than intellectual and moral, and whether it be a question of flowing water, a traveler on a journey, or a thinker or mystic engaged in the pursuit of truth, there inevitably comes a point in time and place when the necessity presents itself, to mechanical forces, or to our freedom of choice, of deciding once and for all which of two paths is the one to take.

I also indicated that the state should permit freedom of choice on matters where a plurality of views are held, based on well - articulated principles rooted in cultural tradition or widely recognized moral, philosophical or religious beliefs.

In this respect, even though we might want to affirm that man has some degree of free choice as to whether or not he will abide by such laws, the moral universe would still be a realm of external determination which would, in the final analysis, depend on some nonhuman rationality, if it were assumed to be rational at all.

What I find puzzling is the obsession with consensual and faithful gay relationships when Scripture says much more about divorce and remarriage (every single sex act with a second spouse is ALWAYS adultery unless someone is unfaithful and that the only moral choice is reconciliation with your first spouse or lifetime celibacy — 1 Cor 7:10 - 11), charging interest on a loan, our moral obligation toward the poor and other things most conservative Christians ignore.

Whatever position one may take regarding future governance of cyberspace, it can not be denied that in any case (moral) choices have to be made and are being made since inevitably the proliferation of cyberspace technologies implies like all technological development a confrontation with moral issues on different levels.

Hobby Lobby has people of all different backgrounds, att.itudes, beliefs, and religions and he can not use his position as CEO to make religiously moral choices on behalf of his entire staff.

... Since man enjoys the capacity for a free personal choice in truth... the right to religious freedom should be viewed as innate to the fundamental dignity of every human person... all people are «impelled by nature and also bound by our moral obligation to seek the truth, especially religious truth» (Second Vatican Council, Dignitatis Humanae, 2)... let me express my sincere hope that your expertise in the fields of law, political science, sociology and economics will converge in these days to bring about fresh insights on this important question andthus bear much fruit now and into the future.

How can we develop a moral stand on a debate that seems to be polarized by those who consider abortion simply a matter of private choice and those who support no legal abortions save those very rare ones necessary to save a mother's life?

Sadly, the Canadian Supreme Court and Parliament made assisted suicide into a «right,» and in so doing imposed the moral philosophy of liberalism — free choice limited only by the prohibition against harming others — on everyone.

Noonan served on the board of the National Right to Life Committee for many years, and readers who want to see how he addressed abortion's moral and legal dimensions should read the elegant arguments in his short book, A Private Choice: Abortion in America in the Seventies.

«These are not just political conflicts or economic choices; they are moral choices with enormous human dimensions,» Bishop Stephen E. Blaire of Stockton, California, chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops» Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, said in a public letter last week.

We never committed to one single particular book on sleep habits either — like you, I was somewhat overwhelmed by all the choices (and the LENGTH, I mean, if my kid isn't sleeping, I probably don't have the time, energy or focus to devote to a 700 - page tome ABOUT SLEEPING), and found that too many authors turned sleep into a moral high ground.

As explained in my neurophilosophical theory of human nature, humans have the potential to be either moral or immoral, depending on their self - interest, and will be influenced in their choices by emotions and socio - cultural contexts.

Tomasi tries to deflect worries about capitalism in practice by claiming the high ground of ideal theory: the philosophical choice between free market fairness and its alternatives ultimately rests not on empirical and feasibility concerns, but rather on which vision of justice is most compelling at a moral level.

But it is strongly opposed by Nick Clegg and other Liberal Democrats who view it as a paternalistic moral judgement on people's lifestyle choices.

So are today's scientists expected to spend as much time agonising over their moral choices as they do on experiments, or do they take ethics in their stride?

In the case of drugs that have a definable ill - effect on the user, and the user alone, it is a moral, political and social decision whether the user's free choice to take the drug should be impeded by legislation.

«Our research examines how moral values of empathy and justice have distinct influences on people when they are asked to make donations benefiting others whose choices have led them to an unfortunate place in life,» write authors Saerom Lee (University of Texas at San Antonio), Karen Page Winterich (Pennsylvania State University), and William T. Ross Jr. (University of Connecticut).

People often believe that it's important to approach eating with this kind of moral framework because it motivates us to stay on track with healthy eating when we can feel good about our «good» choices and bad about our «bad» choices.

These include obsessive focus on food choice, planning, purchase, preparation, and consumption; food regarded primarily as source of health rather than pleasure; distress or disgust when in proximity to prohibited foods; exaggerated faith that inclusion or elimination of particular kinds of food can prevent or cure disease or affect daily well - being; periodic shifts in dietary beliefs while other processes persist unchanged; moral judgment of others based on dietary choices; body image distortion around sense of physical «impurity» rather than weight; persistent belief that dietary practices are health - promoting despite evidence of malnutrition.

I «am a black single mother been single for awhile by choice due to the game playing of our black men i «am 5» 8 in height fun loving, romantic, spontanious, affection ate looking for a fun loving male who has a old school moral on how to treat a woman and is not scared of being in a relationship

In an age where anti-heroes dominate especially the television landscape — recent hit series like AMC's «Breaking Bad» and «Mad Men» and HBO's «Game of Thrones» center on people of ambiguous morals forced to make difficult choices — «Bridge» centers on a person determined to do what is right.

Katniss faces mortal traps, deadly enemies and moral choices when she and her closest friends leave District 13 to launch an assassination attempt on President Snow.

The film turns on their relationship and their choices, as Matt romances Swedish farmer's daughter Helga (Viveca Lindfors) and joins the community and Davey slides into failure, self - pity, and moral compromise.

Hercules does deserve a pat on his impenetrable leather armor for making good moral and ethical choices that require sacrifice.

The family, its ties and the moral choices imposed on them lie, as in every one of Farhadi's scripts, at the heart of the plot.