Damian Hinds» appointment shows the prime minister has not given up
on more grammar schools despite lack of enthusiasm by experts or voters
Not exact matches
For every one child that might successfully make it through a
grammar school and go
on to university there will be many
more left behind at the local secondary believing they weren't good enough.
He could of course try to transform himself into a
more conservative Conservative — championing an EU referendum and big tax cuts and withdrawal from the European Convention
on Human Rights and new
grammar schools and no gay marriage and no
more onshore wind farms, and so
on.
Powell has said that selective education «creates barriers for disadvantaged children» and has called
on Prime Minister Theresa May to rethink proposals to allow
more grammar schools to open.
More than 100 Conservative Party MPs are expected to call for the ban
on new
grammar schools to be scrapped, according to a report from the Telegraph.
Only 38 per cent of people believe that the government should build
more grammar schools and encourage
more schools to select
on academic ability, according to a YouGov poll.
«I think we need to be able to move this debate
on and look at things as they are today, and maybe step away from a
more old - fashioned debate around
grammar schools and work out where they fit in today's landscape.»
Although an official announcement is yet to be made, it is thought Prime Minister Theresa May is considering opening new
grammar schools and the rumours have been given
more validity after a leaked memo written by Department for Education (DfE) permanent secretary Jonathan Slater seemed to confirm
grammars were
on the DfE's agenda.
Public Opinion A YouGov poll found that only 38 per cent of people believe the government should build
more grammar schools and encourage
more schools to select
on academic ability, which suggests there isn't a huge amount of public support for the idea.
The Commission has called
on the government to rethink its plans for
grammar schools and
more academies, cautioning that there is no evidence either works to improve social mobility.
Half of academies sponsored by
grammar schools are rated as requiring improvement or inadequate, casting doubt
on the effectiveness of government plans to get
more selective
schools running other nearby
schools.
Committee chair, Neil Carmichael, said that since the plans for
more grammars had been announced «the air has been thick with the sound of claims and counter-claims
on the benefits and disadvantages of
grammar schools».
Commenting
on the Education Select Committee's report
on the Government's case for creating new
grammar schools, Dr Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL), said: «The Government has failed to provide evidence that
more selection in
schools will improve education for all children and not harm the majority.
Grammar schools - state - funded
schools that select pupils
on the basis of ability - are facing increasing pressure to become
more socially inclusive, amid government plans to increase the number of them.
Barry Sindall, chief executive of the
Grammar School Heads Association, quoted from a 2008 Sutton Trust study which suggested that the social make - up of grammar schools was often more diverse than that of the top 100 comprehensives where entrance is decided on proximity to the school, pushing up house prices and excluding poorer fa
Grammar School Heads Association, quoted from a 2008 Sutton Trust study which suggested that the social make - up of grammar schools was often more diverse than that of the top 100 comprehensives where entrance is decided on proximity to the school, pushing up house prices and excluding poorer fam
School Heads Association, quoted from a 2008 Sutton Trust study which suggested that the social make - up of
grammar schools was often more diverse than that of the top 100 comprehensives where entrance is decided on proximity to the school, pushing up house prices and excluding poorer fa
grammar schools was often
more diverse than that of the top 100 comprehensives where entrance is decided
on proximity to the
school, pushing up house prices and excluding poorer fam
school, pushing up house prices and excluding poorer families.
The research, which is published with the Sutton Trust's response to the government's consultation
on providing
more good
school places, raises serious concerns about using
grammar schools in their current form as a vehicle for social mobility.
In fact, a pupil attending a private prep
school is ten times
more likely to enter a
grammar than a pupil
on free
school meals.
More than 100 Tory MPs are expected to back scrapping the ban
on new
grammar schools as a campaign launches this week to secure the change now Theresa May is in Number 10.
But this research, based
on the detailed results of nearly 550,000 pupils, suggests once the ability and social background of pupils is taken into account,
grammar schools are no
more or less effective than other
schools.
Northern Ireland's 66
grammar schools tend not to prioritise pupils
on free
school meals, but they are
more socially inclusive anyway, with a higher proportion of pupils from poorer backgrounds.
A consultation published by the government
on Wednesday, examining how
schools should support such «ordinary working families», shows affluent children are currently much
more likely to take places in
grammar schools.
The government wants to allow successful academies, including
grammar schools, to take
on more pupils and is consulting
on changes.
«But we know there is
more to do, and that's precisely why we have set out plans to make
more good
school places available, to
more parents, in
more parts of the country - including scrapping the ban
on new
grammar school places, and harnessing the resources and expertise of universities, independent and faith
schools.»
«That's why our consultation
on creating
more good
school places in
more parts of the country includes proposals to scrap the ban
on new
grammar schools —
on the strict condition they improve the education of other pupils in the system — as well as harnessing the expertise and resources of our universities, and our independent and faith
schools.»
A Department for Education spokeswoman said: «The government consultation puts forward proposals to allow
more grammar school places to be created, making them a realistic choice for
more parents, but only
on the basis that strict conditions are met to ensure this also contributes to the improvement of other parts of the
school system.»
She tells BBC Radio 4's The World at One that she is in favour of
more grammar schools saying they «are a welcome addition to the choice
on offer to parents» and that they will be «a 21st century model of
grammar school».
A Department for Education spokesperson said: «The Sutton Trust itself has highlighted the positive impact
grammar schools can have
on pupils from less well - off backgrounds and that's exactly why we want
more young people to benefit.
We want to remove the restrictive regulations that are preventing
more children from going to high - quality faith
schools, and we want to end the ban
on the opening of new
grammar schools.
I really welcome the points in the Government's Green Paper
on widening access so that
more children have a chance to attend excellent
grammar schools.
I do not think that it is tenable in a country that has
grammars and selection for the Opposition to say they do not like that situation, but that they do not want us to take any steps whatever to see how we can deliver
more strongly
on social mobility through the
schools already in place.
Although some
grammar schools do have catchment areas, these tend to be wider than those of nearby comprehensives, and as a result being able to send your child to a
grammar school is less likely to depend
on your ability to afford to live nearby, especially if it's in a
more expensive area.
He added that there was a risk that pupils in areas with large numbers of selective places,
more grammar schools would «reduce the results achieved by poorer children»
on average.
Gibb was probed
on whether the government should remove a ban
on new
grammar schools, thought to be something being weighed up by Prime Minister Theresa May, in front of an audience of
more than 4,000 educationalists at the Teach First Impact Conference in Leeds today.
Mr Gove, debating education policy alongside the former US education secretary Arne Duncan refused to be drawn
on whether he agreed with the push for
more grammar schools in England.
We are currently hearing
more horrific details of the child abuse that went
on for decades at the Knox
Grammar School, and the indifference of the former head master, who did little or nothing when these events were made known to him.