One example is the criteria for determining whether a public school is high - quality, or has the potential to be high - quality, which will be based
on multiple measures such as state assessments, graduation rates, and other metrics.
Students can be evaluated
on multiple measures such as:
Not exact matches
RealityMine — which announced a $ 17.2 - million financing
on Monday —
measures TV viewing activity across
multiple platforms,
such as smartphones and tablets.
The company's strengths can be seen in
multiple areas,
such as its revenue growth, reasonable valuation levels, largely solid financial position with reasonable debt levels by most
measures and notable return
on equity.
The company's strengths can be seen in
multiple areas,
such as its reasonable valuation levels, expanding profit margins, largely solid financial position with reasonable debt levels by most
measures and notable return
on equity.
The company's strengths can be seen in
multiple areas,
such as its revenue growth, largely solid financial position with reasonable debt levels by most
measures, notable return
on equity, increase in stock price during the past year and expanding profit margins.
The climate change «hockey stick» is a graph first published in 1998 by Michael Mann et al. that attempted to reconstruct the mean surface temperature
on the planet during the period A. D. 900 to the present, using
multiple proxies,
such as tree rings, to
measure temperatures before formal instrumentation was in use.
After extensive research
on teacher evaluation procedures, the
Measures of Effective Teaching Project mentions three different measures to provide teachers with feedback for growth: (1) classroom observations by peer - colleagues using validated scales such as the Framework for Teaching or the Classroom Assessment Scoring System, further described in Gathering Feedback for Teaching (PDF) and Learning About Teaching (PDF), (2) student evaluations using the Tripod survey developed by Ron Ferguson from Harvard, which measures students» perceptions of teachers» ability to care, control, clarify, challenge, captivate, confer, and consolidate, and (3) growth in student learning based on standardized test scores over multipl
Measures of Effective Teaching Project mentions three different
measures to provide teachers with feedback for growth: (1) classroom observations by peer - colleagues using validated scales such as the Framework for Teaching or the Classroom Assessment Scoring System, further described in Gathering Feedback for Teaching (PDF) and Learning About Teaching (PDF), (2) student evaluations using the Tripod survey developed by Ron Ferguson from Harvard, which measures students» perceptions of teachers» ability to care, control, clarify, challenge, captivate, confer, and consolidate, and (3) growth in student learning based on standardized test scores over multipl
measures to provide teachers with feedback for growth: (1) classroom observations by peer - colleagues using validated scales
such as the Framework for Teaching or the Classroom Assessment Scoring System, further described in Gathering Feedback for Teaching (PDF) and Learning About Teaching (PDF), (2) student evaluations using the Tripod survey developed by Ron Ferguson from Harvard, which
measures students» perceptions of teachers» ability to care, control, clarify, challenge, captivate, confer, and consolidate, and (3) growth in student learning based on standardized test scores over multipl
measures students» perceptions of teachers» ability to care, control, clarify, challenge, captivate, confer, and consolidate, and (3) growth in student learning based
on standardized test scores over
multiple years.
These observations can help educators make valuable inferences regarding students» mastery over skills, while offering new ways to assess factors not easily
measured on multiple - choice tests,
such as problem solving, critical thinking, collaboration, persistence, and creativity.
Requiring regular evaluations of teachers using
multiple measures based
on clear standards for effective practice,
measures of student achievement growth, and other
measures such as observations and lesson plans or other artifacts of practice.
As
such, NEA urges legislators to address ESEA reauthorization issues by focusing
on ensuring equity, updating accountability requirements based
on multiple measures that emphasize and support school improvement, and providing sustainable support and technical assistance for priority schools.
Instead of relying
on intelligence and achievement test scores solely for identification,
multiple criteria would be used, including more non-traditional
measures such as observing students interacting with a variety of learning opportunities (Passow & Frasier, 1996) it is a belief of many in the field of gifted education that new conceptions of giftedness and a new paradigm for identifying and selecting students will help minority and disadvantaged students become more represented in gifted programs (VanTassel - Baska, Patton, & Prillaman, 1991; Ford, 1996).
No state bases more than 50 percent of a teacher's evaluation
on student performance scores (see the infographic
on p. 4), and many incorporate
multiple additional
measures,
such as classroom observations, student writing and artwork, teacher lesson plans, peer review, student reflections and feedback, and participation in professional development (Shakman et al., 2012).
In terms of deciding the criteria for whether a school has or could become high - quality, the group said it would base decisions
on «
multiple measures such as state assessments, graduation rates, and other metrics.»
Teachers with evaluations based
on multiple measures beyond observations,
such as self - assessment, school - wide
measures of student growth, and student surveys, were more likely to respond that their evaluations are at least somewhat helpful.
Measuring student growth without relying solely
on narrow standardized tests involves looking at
multiple measures of student learning,
such as essay exams, portfolios of students» work in various subjects, and group projects that require analysis, investigation, experimentation, cooperation, and written, oral, or graphic presentation of findings.
As documented under Section 1115 of Title I, Part A of the Every Students Succeeds Act (ESSA), a local education agency receiving Title I funds «may use funds received under this part only for programs that provide services to eligible children under subsection (b) identified as having the greatest need for special assistance... Eligible children are children identified by the school as failing, or most at risk of failing, to meet the State's challenging student academic achievement standards
on the basis of
multiple, educationally related, objective criteria established by the local educational agency and supplemented by the school, except that children from preschool through grade 2 shall be selected solely
on the basis of
such criteria as teacher judgment, interviews with parents, and developmentally appropriate
measures».
«Teachers should never be evaluated
on the basis of a single consideration,
such as test scores, much less a single score from a single test, but rather
on the basis of
multiple measures that include both learning outcomes and effective practices, with approximately 50 percent associated with each.»
However, the law requires districts to include certain practices,
such as relying
on multiple objective
measures in placement decisions, using student performance data to ensure equity and efficacy, and ensuring the consistency of placement policies between elementary and high school districts.
The authors find that statewide accountability
measures fall into one of seven main categories of indicators: achievement indicators,
such as proficiency in reading and mathematics; student growth indicators in
multiple academic subjects; English language acquisition indicators; early warning indicators,
such as chronic absenteeism; persistence indicators,
such as graduation rates; college - and career - ready indicators,
such as participation in and performance
on college entry exams; and other indicators,
such as access to the arts.
You agree not to engage in any of the following prohibited activities: (i) copying, distributing, or disclosing any part of the Service in any medium, including without limitation by any automated or non-automated «scraping»; (ii) using any automated system, including without limitation «robots,» «spiders,» «offline readers,» etc., to access the Service in a manner that sends more request messages to the Company servers than a human can reasonably produce in the same period of time by using a conventional
on - line web browser (except that Humble Bundle grants the operators of public search engines revocable permission to use spiders to copy materials from Humble Bundle for the sole purpose of and solely to the extent necessary for creating publicly available searchable indices of the materials, but not caches or archives of
such materials); (iii) transmitting spam, chain letters, or other unsolicited email; (iv) attempting to interfere with, compromise the system integrity or security or decipher any transmissions to or from the servers running the Service; (v) taking any action that imposes, or may impose in our sole judgment an unreasonable or disproportionately large load
on our infrastructure; (vi) uploading invalid data, viruses, worms, or other software agents through the Service; (vii) collecting or harvesting any personally identifiable information, including account names, from the Service; (viii) using the Service for any commercial solicitation purposes; (ix) impersonating another person or otherwise misrepresenting your affiliation with a person or entity, conducting fraud, hiding or attempting to hide your identity; (x) interfering with the proper working of the Service; (xi) accessing any content
on the Service through any technology or means other than those provided or authorized by the Service; (xii) bypassing the
measures we may use to prevent or restrict access to the Service, including without limitation features that prevent or restrict use or copying of any content or enforce limitations
on use of the Service or the content therein; (xiii) sell, assign, rent, lease, act as a service bureau, or grant rights in the Products, including, without limitation, through sublicense, to any other entity without the prior written consent of
such Products» (defined below) licensors; (xiv) circumventing Service limitations
on the number of Products you may purchase, including, without limitation, creating
multiple accounts and purchasing a total number of Products through
such multiple accounts which exceed the per - user limitations; or (xv) except as otherwise specifically set forth in a licensor's end user license agreement, as otherwise agreed upon by a licensor in writing or as otherwise allowed under applicable law, distributing, transmitting, copying (other than re-installing software or files previously purchased by you through the Service
on computers, mobile or tablet devices owned by you, or creating backup copies of
such software or files for your own personal use) or otherwise exploiting the Products (defined below) in any manner other than for your own private, non-commercial, personal use.
ECD programmes can take many forms, including promotion of good health and nutrition, support for safe and stimulating environments, protection from risks
such as violence or abandonment, parenting support and early learning experiences, media, preschools and community groups.4 Poverty is the key underlying cause of poor child development; children living in poverty are exposed to many negative influences, including poor physical environments, inadequate nutrition, parental stress and insufficient cognitive stimulation.5 Undernutrition can influence brain development directly by affecting brain structure and function, or indirectly via poor physical or motor development, in addition to other pathways.6 — 8 Exposure to
multiple co-occurring risks most likely contributes to greater disparities in developmental trajectories among children with differential exposure.9 — 12 This paper focuses
on associations between specific aspects of children's physical environments — access to improved water and sanitation (W&S)-- and childhood development as
measured by performance
on a test of receptive language.