Sentences with phrase «on my assertions above»

I didn't bother to research my comment before I made it, so I could be a little off - base on my assertions above, but still, yeah, I used to love watching knight rider when I was a kid.

Not exact matches

Even if your assertion were true, how does that bear on the comment thread above it?

The type of atheists, like most on this post, that continue with the ridiculous assertion that there can be nothing greater than us that exists above or outside of our little physical realm, are simply either intellectually stunted individuals, or more likely, bitter people who have gotten their panties in a bunch because some religious text contains some apparent condemnation of their lifestyle.

While conceding that there is «some basis» for concerns about «the negative social effects of globalization», it contends that it is «not true that globalization is an overwhelming supra - national force that has largely usurped national policy autonomy...» It asserts that «national policies can, and should, give priority to mitigating negative effects on globalization» of financial markets), and the desperate and helpless attempts by the national regimes to come to grips with the soaring unemployment situation in the face of the continuing onslaught of the «supra - national» financial markets, the above bland assertion about «national policies» has an air of unreality about it.

I am (a) A victim of child molestation (b) A r.ape victim trying to recover (c) A mental patient with paranoid delusions (d) A Christian The only discipline known to often cause people to kill others they have never met and / or to commit suicide in its furtherance is: (a) Architecture; (b) Philosophy; (c) Archeology; or (d) Religion What is it that most differentiates science and all other intellectual disciplines from religion: (a) Religion tells people not only what they should believe, but what they are morally obliged to believe on pain of divine retribution, whereas science, economics, medicine etc. has no «sacred cows» in terms of doctrine and go where the evidence leads them; (b) Religion can make a statement, such as «there is a composite god comprised of God the Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit», and be totally immune from experimentation and challenge, whereas science can only make factual assertions when supported by considerable evidence; (c) Science and the scientific method is universal and consistent all over the World whereas religion is regional and a person's religious conviction, no matter how deeply held, is clearly nothing more than an accident of birth; or (d) All of the above.

Mark Serwotka was recently interviewed in The Guardian: «The most likely comment to exasperate Serwotka is the assertion that they're fat cats, a smug drain on the public purse: of 301,000 members «we've got 30,000 people earning just above the minimum wage, 100,000 earning less than # 15,000 [the average civil service salary is # 22,000].

I had an argument once, about Gary Taubes with a commenter on my Underground Nutritionist Facebook page, because he didn't agree with my assertion that Gary blames Insulin above everything else for the Obesity problem.

While I agree very much with Eric Snider's assessment of Django Unchained as «lesser Tarantino» - I place it above on Death Proof on my own personal rankings - I also agree with his further assertion that it is a...

I should add, though, and in all fairness given the Review of Paper # 3 — on VAMs» potentials here, many of these aforementioned assertions are somewhat hypothetical in the sense that they are based on the grander literature surrounding teachers» working conditions, versus the direct, unintended effects of VAMs, given no research yet exists to examine the above, or other unintended effects, empirically.

While it isn't a clean - sheet design approach, new elements like the 7 - inch information display in the center of the gauge cluster on EX trim models and higher give the cabin a sleeker, more modern feel that jives with Honda's assertion that they targeted class - above benchmarks here.

Worse yet, what prompted my comment above, is that he's making the distinction based on whether the writer / author makes a living from his / her work — which is the most ridiculous and naive assertion.

What you're reading above are, first, several top - line assertions I've excerpted from a report on an all - new set of calculations.

McCarthy's assertion that the leakage issue only became clear enough to act now is hard to swallow, particularly given Obama's longstanding «all of the above» push on energy, which I supported, but only if it came with extra attention to oversight.

On the whole, the conversation about melting has been about the years since 1979 when we have more complete and accurate measurements, but I don't think one can support the above assertion unless you work hard to exclude any inconvenient data.

Here's what I in my ignorance assume to be an informatic (you are the first person I've run across that uses the term as a noun, but I assume that is because you are trend - setter) that might shed new light on the assertions in your post above:

On a side note: The trends above for the period 1980 to 1995 also show that the recent assertions by David Rose in the Daily Mail and by Judith Curry, according to whom the recent time period was something different to what had been observed before in the temperature record since the 1970ies are false.

He argued there, specifically, that my statements on drought «directly contradicted scientific reports,» and in support of that assertion he offered the same statements from his July testimony that were quoted by Senator Sessions (see above).

Quite aside from the matter of a Greenpeace author assessing his own work, the above assertion — one that was widely covered in the world press — appears to be untrue based on my reading of the report itself to date.

His assertion of lower sea - levels in the crusader period is based on a single data point which is immediately preceded by another that is significantly above sea level.

Christy elaborated his statement above in a follow - up post on Spencer's blog, making several false assertions in the process, such as:

But as far as the allegedly lewd comment was concerned, despite the tribunal's assertion of the band of reasonable responses test, had it not, for example, in expressing a view on what a majority of the public might have thought, in effect substituted its own view for that of the employer (as in the EAT cases discussed above)?