Not exact matches
We should keep religion out
of the
classroom, and teach our young people science based
on scientific
observations, and facts.
The system is based
on multiple measures
of performance including student achievement and rigorous
classroom observations.
Such ratings would be based
on results
of classroom observations and tests selected locally by school districts.
After achieving the passage
of a new evaluation system that will rely
on a mix
on at least one standardized test and in -
classroom observation, the governor is renewing his focus to areas NYSUT has opposed, including a lifting
of the cap
on charter schools and a $ 150 million education investment tax credit, which is strongly backed by private and parochial schools.
The budget also created a new teacher evaluation system that relies
on a mix
of in -
classroom observation and at least one standardized test to assess performance.
The legislation includes changes to the state's teacher evaluation law, which will rely
on a mix
of state testing and in -
classroom observation.
Four - out -
of - five New York City voters (80 %) support a new teacher evaluation system based
on both
classroom observations and test scores, with 56 % supporting such a system strongly.
The New York Daily News reports
on our poll that found that 80 %
of NYC voters support a new teacher evaluation system based
on both
classroom observations and test scores.
The New York Daily News blog reports
on StudentsFirstNY's recent poll that found that 80 %
of NYC voters support a new teacher evaluation system based
on both
classroom observations and test scores.
The letter went
on to cite reports
of teachers who did not receive a final tenure decision because the principal did not complete the
classroom observation or was new to the school.
Whatever the parties negotiate or King decides, the evaluation system will be based 20 percent
on standardized test scores when applicable, 20 percent
on other evidence
of student learning and 60 percent
on classroom observation and other measures
of teacher effectiveness, in keeping with the 2010 state law
on teacher evaluation.
The new evaluation system will provide clear standards and significant guidance to local school districts for implementation
of teacher evaluations based
on multiple measures
of performance including student achievement and rigorous
classroom observations.
Under the larger evaluation framework, announced in Albany Thursday afternoon, teachers will be graded
on a 100 - point scale, 60 percent
of which will be based
on evaluations
of teacher performance, including
classroom observations.
«The tendency to base
classroom observation on the gender and race
of the child may explain in part why those children are more frequently identified as misbehaving and hence why there is a racial disparity in discipline,» added Walter S. Gilliam, director
of The Edward Zigler Center in Child Development and Social Policy and associate professor
of child psychiatry and psychology at the Yale Child Study Center.
Sometimes, researchers measured teacher success based
on the
observation of classroom supervisors.
Consensus needs to be reached
on the focus
of the
observation (teacher, students or both), the frequency and duration
of observations, the structure
of pre - and post-
observation meetings, who is going to own and control these data (critical with video recordings), and last, but certainly not least, the
classroom observation guide to be used.
At every meal and at the end
of each day, we would set aside critical time to debrief
on our
observations, insights and ideas for Steve's
classroom.
Another study will assess the impact
of different frequencies
of observations on teachers and whether teachers trained as observers also improve their own
classroom practice.
For a number
of reasons — limited reliability, the potential for abuse, the recent evidence that teachers have effects
on student earnings and college going which are largely not captured by test - based measures — it would not make sense to attach 100 percent
of the weight to test - based measures (or any
of the available measures, including
classroom observations, for that matter).
So I guess one key aspect would be actually doing behavioural
observations of self - regulation and behaviour in the
classroom rather than relying
on teacher ratings, though we do find that teachers are pretty accurate in their ratings
of behaviour.
After extensive research
on teacher evaluation procedures, the Measures
of Effective Teaching Project mentions three different measures to provide teachers with feedback for growth: (1)
classroom observations by peer - colleagues using validated scales such as the Framework for Teaching or the
Classroom Assessment Scoring System, further described in Gathering Feedback for Teaching (PDF) and Learning About Teaching (PDF), (2) student evaluations using the Tripod survey developed by Ron Ferguson from Harvard, which measures students» perceptions
of teachers» ability to care, control, clarify, challenge, captivate, confer, and consolidate, and (3) growth in student learning based
on standardized test scores over multiple years.
There is an expectation among the school staff that they practice a culture
of continuous improvement and risk - taking based
on a cycle
of conversations,
classroom observations, constructive feedback, and planning and implementing strategies that aim to directly make a difference to
classroom practices in line with the priorities identified for school improvement.
Under IMPACT, all teachers receive a single score ranging from 100 to 400 points at the end
of each school year based
on classroom observations, measures
of student learning, and commitment to the school community.
Traditionally, teacher evaluation systems relied heavily
on classroom observations conducted by principals or other school administrators, sometimes with the help
of rubrics or checklists.
As educators who have spent over 20 years researching, observing and studying
classroom practice, we are even more convinced that many
of the past practices in
classroom observation relied
on snapshot
observations made by supervisors with little professional or academic learning.
Jay accuses the foundation
of failing to disclose the limited power
of classroom observation scores in predicting future test score gains over and above what one would predict based
on value - added scores alone.
MET argues for a more balanced set
of weights among value added,
classroom observations, and feedback from student surveys
on other grounds.
These new systems depend primarily
on two types
of measurements: student test score gains
on statewide assessments in math and reading in grades 4 - 8 that can be uniquely associated with individual teachers; and systematic
classroom observations of teachers by school leaders and central staff.
Illustrative
of this, when we divided teachers into five equal - sized groups based
on the average prior academic achievement
of their incoming students, we found that roughly three times as many (29 %)
of the teachers with the least prepared incoming students were identified as low performing based
on classroom observations relative to teachers with the most prepared students incoming students (11 %).
When compared with such crude indicators, the combination
of student achievement gains
on state tests, student surveys, and
classroom observations identified teachers with better outcomes
on every measure we tested: state tests and supplemental tests as well as more subjective measures, such as student - reported effort and enjoyment in class.
(To generate the weights, we regressed a teacher's average student - achievement gain in one class against the three different measures from another class, resulting in weights
of.758,.200, and.042
on value - added, student survey, and
classroom observation, respectively).
Several studies, including our own, clearly demonstrate that teacher evaluation systems that are based
on a number
of components, such as
classroom observation scores and test - score gains, are already much more effective at predicting future teacher performance than paper credentials and years
of experience.
Likewise, if a teacher is performing well
on the
classroom observations and student surveys but had lower - than - expected student - achievement gains, a school leader might give the teacher the benefit
of the doubt for another year and hope that student achievement gains will rise.
In a significant pedagogical shift from the norm
of timed set recordings or set
classroom observation, leading to «performances» from the teacher and the students (the Hawthorne effect), an always -
on camera recording 360 - degree video enable live and retrospective viewing.
The achievement gains based
on that measure were more reliable measures
of a teacher's practice (less variable across different classes taught by the same teacher) and were more closely related to other measures, such as
classroom observations and student surveys.
In the interim, schools might adapt their
classroom observations and student surveys to look for evidence
of student writing or add questions to the student survey asking students to describe the quality
of feedback they receive
on their writing.
«We have collegial
observations and the
observation form that we use has space [for] questions that the observing teachers ask students about what's happening in the
classroom, the learning strategies that are being used and how much they understand
of the learning intentions and so
on,» Taylor explains.
In her role as Principal for the program, Simpson supported mentors and interns in the implementation
of project - based assessments, facilitated planning meetings between mentor and intern teachers, and made daily
observations in
classrooms and provided feedback and support based
on those
observations to both mentors and interns.
If all the weight were placed
on classroom observations, then instructors would be tempted to go through the motions
of effective practice
on the day
of an
observation but not
on other days.
We contend, however, that evaluations based
on observations of classroom practice are valuable, even if they do not predict student achievement gains considerably better than more subjective methods like principal ratings
of teachers.
Teachers» scores
on the
classroom observation components
of Cincinnati's evaluation system reliably predict the achievement gains made by their students in both math and reading.
Scores are based
on multiple
classroom observations, measures
of student learning, and commitment to the school community.
An iterative process
of observation and conferencing focused
on improving lesson planning and preparation, the
classroom environment, and instructional techniques should drive positive changes in teacher practice.
What is notable about the version
of teacher evaluation systems currently evolving in districts throughout the nation, however, is the continued emphasis
on classroom observations, with many systems employing the same
observation tool used in CPS under the EITP initiative.
We examine a unique intervention in Chicago Public Schools (CPS) to uncover the causal impact
on school performance
of an evaluation system based
on highly structured
classroom observations of teacher practice.
Although the interviews provide context, the main focus is
on observations of classroom teaching, school leadership, and the school's capacity to improve.»
You had plans to visit a few
classrooms, catch up
on some paperwork, and meet with a couple
of teachers to discuss upcoming
classroom observations.
While this approach contrasts starkly with status quo «principal walk - through» styles
of class
observation, its use is
on the rise in new and proposed evaluation systems in which rigorous
classroom observation is often combined with other measures, such as teacher value - added based
on student test scores.
We study a sample
of midcareer elementary and middle school teachers in the Cincinnati Public Schools, all
of whom were evaluated in a yearlong program, based largely
on classroom observation, sometime between the 2003 — 04 and 2009 — 10 school years.
In addition, our analysis does not compare value added with other measures
of teacher quality, like evaluations based
on classroom observation, which might be even better predictors
of teachers» long - term impacts than VA scores.