Sentences with phrase «on naive authors»

These contracts were usually offered on a «take - it - or - leave - it» basis by larger entities who, recognizing their unequal baragining position, offered non-negotiable contracts (the very nature of a contract is that it should represent the negotiations of the parties) that sought to force their unreasonable terms on naive authors and novice publishers, so eager to be published and distributed that they skimmed by the small print.

Not exact matches

While the authors should know better than to make such claims, it's very clear that the science - naive journalists who report on these studies have never learned that association does not equal causation.

Now, if the author is talking about naive «educators,» in general, who make consequential decisions as based on poor (i.e., the oppostie of «rich») data, this assertion would be true.

No matter how you slice it, poop is still poop, and vanity publishing is a big wad of it that preys on the naive newbie and gullible authors.

Worse yet, what prompted my comment above, is that he's making the distinction based on whether the writer / author makes a living from his / her work — which is the most ridiculous and naive assertion.

But let me tell you, back when I was a naive, trusting seventeen - year - old (as opposed to the naive, not - so - trusting twenty - two - year - old I am now), I was completely bummed out that if I became the author I wanted to be, I'd have to pay taxes on my hard - earned royalties.

Title: Dragonball, Dragon Ball Z Genre: Action, Adventure, Comedy Author: Akira Toriyama Synopsis: Meet a naive young monkey - tailed boy named Goku, whose quiet life changes when he meets Bulma, a girl who is on a quest to collect seven «Dragon Balls.»

Vanity presses and the «pay - to - publish» crowd often prey on the would - be and naive author.

Naive authors don't realize when they sign with these companies that their books are printed on an «on demand» basis, in which a paperback sells for $ 20.

It would be naive to think that book reviews procured by a publisher for its author were free, unbiased and unculled (have you seen a bad review on a dust jacket?).

This is a new writing scam that preys on naive indie authors with Hollywood dreams.

There are more predators out there feeding on naive writers than there are successful authors.