Whereas separational performers are primarily marketed through explicitly Christian bookstores, «integrational» performers seek to address wider audiences, thus «crossing over» to distribution through such mainstream outlets as Tower Records and airplay
on nonreligious radio stations and MTV.
Not exact matches
Why is it religious and sectarian when an elementary school teacher prays in front of a class room of children, but a mere
nonreligious solemnization when a President stands in front of the nation and swears,
on a Bible, so help him God, to carry out the office to which he has been entrusted?
One could have an abortion and happy they denied life to an innocent in favor of their own lifestyle, one could have a baby with the intent
on sacrificing it to Satan in some way, shape, or form, it could go lots of different ways for lots of different reasons but contradicting itself is of absolutely no concern as a lot of Satanists also label themselves «
nonreligious».
The idea here is very clear: If a person is
nonreligious, then TM presents itself as being
nonreligious, too, so as to meet him
on his own turf; then it draws him to a «unified, monistic, cosmic God - consciousness» typical of Hinduism, never indicating in advance where he is headed.
Oh, and from a totally
nonreligious standpoint, helping our citizenry get a strong education and stay healthy so they can continue to be productive members of society instead of winding up
on disability or
on unemployment due to limited job skills happens to make economic sense as well.
So if someone wants to use the law today, it would be wiser to use it toward pastors and seminary professors, than to
nonreligious masses
on the streets and at work.
The independence of those vehicles in turn depends upon whether church personnel are willing and able to relinquish their monopoly
on God talk about the nation and whether other persons (in
nonreligious roles) are willing and able to adopt such theological rhetoric.
Blue Like Jazz:
Nonreligious Thoughts
on Christian Spirituality by Donald Miller — The book that is likely
on the short list for 90 % of evangelicals my age, Donald Miller made me feel a little less crazy.
What does this mean for the actual,
on - the - ground experience of living alongside the plurality of religious communities — and
nonreligious ones too — that we can not escape or ignore in our world?
Although many observers see this growth only as evidence of the increasing irrelevance of religion, the
nonreligious represent an important cultural group, as liberal
on social issues as the most committed religious people are conservative.
Religious individuals or groups are quite free under our Constitution to advocate or oppose policies
on religious grounds or
nonreligious grounds.
The answer does not lie in transferring their narcosis from
nonreligious to religious programs; it lies in liberation from dependence
on mediated experience and escapist material.
We are trying to make a big, beautiful impression upon the affluent
nonreligious American who is riding by
on this busy freeway.»
On the other hand, postmodern interpretations of the human self, language, and textuality, while often couched in
nonreligious terms, call into question many assumptions of critical exegesis and suggest sympathy with the themes and sensibilities of the premodern Christian tradition.
Some of my
nonreligious computer science colleagues, like Ray Kurzweil, hope to cheat death by backing themselves up
on a computer, along the lines described in the first thought experiment.
Respondents who scored high
on church attendance and «intrinsic religiosity» were only 31 percent likely to treat underserved populations, compared with 35 percent among the
nonreligious; spirituality and youth were better predictors of service.
The children from
nonreligious households left 4.1 stickers
on average, a statistically significant difference from Christian children (3.3) and Muslim ones (3.2).
However, the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), in a series of surveys conducted between 1993 and 2012, reported
on parental satisfaction with assigned public schools, public schools chosen by parents, private religious schools, and private
nonreligious schools.
And
nonreligious private schools might not be able to draw
on the community sources of social capital that Coleman deemed vital to Catholic high schools» success.
Thus, religious scholarship groups would face the choice of giving scholarships to promote other faiths or totally
nonreligious schools — which violates their religious freedom to focus
on advancing their own faith.
I think that's why the religious element of Room doesn't seem to bother
nonreligious readers; they can just put it
on a par with Santa.
Maybe it's bad for federal law to impose such an obligation
on employers, whether because the law is too vague, imposes unduly
on private employers, imposes unduly
on coworkers, gives an undue preference to conscientious objectors (it has been interpreted to apply to
nonreligious conscientious objectors as well as religious ones), or something else.
In the face of these patchwork gaps, American human rights groups have been advocating for the adoption of a federal bill titled the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would prohibit discrimination in hiring and employment
on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity by
nonreligious employers with over 15 employees.