As Xavier pointed out, you are not
on oath when entering a plea (among other reasons, you would be required to incriminate yourself).
Not exact matches
You have had hundreds of years to distance yourself from religious extremism, so now
when your President puts his hand
on the Bible to take the
oath of office you don't see anything wrong.
20
When I have brought them into the land flowing with milk and honey, the land I promised on oath to their ancestors, and when they eat their fill and thrive, they will turn to other gods and worship them, rejecting me and breaking my coven
When I have brought them into the land flowing with milk and honey, the land I promised
on oath to their ancestors, and
when they eat their fill and thrive, they will turn to other gods and worship them, rejecting me and breaking my coven
when they eat their fill and thrive, they will turn to other gods and worship them, rejecting me and breaking my covenant.
'' [The Christians] were in the habit of meeting
on a certain fixed day before it was light,
when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn
oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust
when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reas semble to partake of food — but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.»
And
when the President put his hand
on the Holy Bible at his Inauguration and took the
Oath to serve, defend and protect the United States to the best of his ability, he meant it as he has done so not only in words but also by deeds.
You also believe that you must take
on secret temple names, wear garments (underwear) that has secret symbols that are used in secret rituals in the temple as well as a blood
oath that began in 1843, but ended in 1990
when there was a general uproar amongst non-mormons that found out about this particular ritual.
The story goes that Washington was all set for his inauguration
when it was decided he should take the
oath on a Bible.
When one subscriber wrote to accept a trial offer
on the condition that the editor and his staff sign a pledge that none was «or ever had been» a member of the Communist Party, Editor Hutchinson was so incensed that he didn't just return the money, but told of its return in a long editorial: «We are Christians, not Communists;... our understanding of what it means to be Christian makes it impossible for us to be Communist... [But] we shall not sign this
oath» (June 10, 1953).
But, regardless of its actual author, classicists all acknowledge that the Hippocratic
Oath dates back at least to the fourth century b.c. and marks the moment
when» thanks to Hippocrates» influence
on his many students and apprentices» medicine separated itself from magic and pledged itself to preserving life.
When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be
on Oath or Affirmation.
On Friday, April 6 and Saturday, April 7,
Oath Pizza in Brookline will be offering Buy One Get One Pizzas all day
when you show your ticket / email confirmation for either Coolidge After Midnite showing of Mad Max: Fury Road.
And please remember, The Attorney General who fired Andrew McCabe for a «lack of candor» is
on video tape lying to Congress under
oath when he denied multiple meetings with Russian Ambassador Kislyak — IRONIC!
«Airbnb has refused to disclose data
on their illegal listings, even
when they've been subpoenaed by the city and questioned under
oath by the Council,» City Council speaker Corey Johnson told Politico in a statement.
«And
when they see the crowd at Eagle Square and PMB taking the
Oath of Office
on that day, they should continue in the delusion that it's all fake.»
Being forcibly questioned
on oath and without warning or legal advisors, with no hint of what the questions related to or whether it was a matter involving them or someone else (maybe a family member or friend), the subject either had to incriminate themself or someone else by telling the truth, be charged with perjury if they lied or other witnesses said differently
when questioned in turn, or be charged with contempt of court if they didn't speak.
It is only
when he is to be put
on oath that he can raise his objection.
When Trump takes the
oath of office at noon
on Friday, he will be the first New York native to be president since Franklin D. Roosevelt.
«America's the greatest country in the world and I have an opportunity,
when at the proper time, to present my evidence that rebukes any of this nonsense that I would ever do anything that sacrifices my
oath of office,» Mangano said in a press conference
on Thursday afternoon.
[9] Smith withdrew from the race
on June 6, 2017, after the Miami Herald reported that he had not been registered as a Democrat for at least a year before running, contradicting the
oath he took
when he filed to run.
Part of the conflict of ideas is
when someone goes into a profession where part of the
oath they take and the responsibilities is known, beforehand, to possibly conflict with their ethics / morals, but they choose to go into that profession anyways, but then, by claiming the moral conflict, they basically attempt to impose their beliefs
on those needing services.
This seemingly simple question — the heart of the commissioner's defense against accusations that he misused the vehicle — threatened to engulf him in yet another scandal
on Monday
when two former senior correction officials all but accused him of lying under
oath at a City Council budget hearing.
The new administration takes over officially
on New Year's Eve,
when he and Duffy will take the
oath of office in a private event at the Executive Mansion.
It's too bad that the makeup in question here is distracting from Harrelson's performance, because midway into the film,
when he is taking the
oath on Air Force One, his «not without Jackie» moment is a powerful scene.
«While taking this
oath — which was very serious, except
when I asked if he would always be
on his best behavior and the Waverly Eaglet shook his head no — he placed his wing
on our yearbook,» Melendez reported.
Clean Air Act which will increase pollution) 13) timing press releases so bad news will miss the news cycle
on long weekends, especially
when they plan
on not enforcing environmental laws 14) press not reporting
on the outrageous use of signing statements (president basically saying he intends to violate his
oath of office) 15) press rarely reporting
on anti-war demonstrations 16) Whitehouse use of Fox News (sic) and right - wing demagogue radio to get its message out 17) right - wing attempt to take over NPR and PBS.
Vaughn, I wish I would be given a chance; to ask you 101 questions,
when you are
on a witness stand, under
oath.
tempterrain
When you have to declare
on oath that your analyses are true
on pain of prison, you are «a bit more careful» over what you state.
«Immediately after the Senate vote Tuesday, it became obvious that the White House, not the Supreme Court, was making the decisions
on when Alito would take his
oaths of office and begin his service...»
In this question the hypothetical situation was that the defendant (say) stated
on oath «My attorney advised me to take that course»,
when in fact the attorney (present in court) advised him not to take that course at all.
In my experience, in real life, people are more likely to lie
when they are under
oath than
when they are not under
oath, and law enforcement officers tend to be particularly good at lying
on the stand because they testify frequently in court cases.
More than 20 years ago,
when I took my
oath of office to serve as a judge
on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, I solemnly swore to «administer justice without respect to persons,» to «do equal right to the poor and to the rich,» and to «faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me... under the Constitution and laws of the United States.»
Interim orders are always subject to being replaced at the time of trial
when more complete evidence is presented, witnesses are examined under
oath and they are cross examined and expert evidence
on contested issues can be assessed.
When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be
on Oath or Affirmation.