Sentences with phrase «on objects made»

Not exact matches

He appeared to make some sort of gesture at the police with an object in his hand just before they ordered him to lie down on the ground and took him away.
The printers — used industrially and also on a smaller scale to make digitally designed, three - dimensional objects from plastic — have not been used much for building.
In addition to building the first light gun — a gun - shaped controller that allows users to shoot objects on screen — he created the forerunner to Atari's Pong game as well as the colorful electronic memory game Simon, which made its debut in 1978 at Studio 54 and continues to be sold today.
Why it matters: The ability to make large and complex metal objects on demand could transform manufacturing.
We will start to see a plethora of «dumb» objects become connected, sending signals to each other and alerts to our phones, and creating mounds of «little data» on all of us that will make marketers salivate.
You can drag around objects on a site to make a smaller pin.
Tesla also warns its drivers in the car's manual to pay attention to the road and prepare to take corrective action since the Autopilot can not always detect and make decisions and actions concerning stationary objects on its path.
Turing Pharmaceuticals CEO Martin Shkreli is now stating that he wishes he'd raised the price on the AIDS drug Daraprim by more than the 5000 % that made him the object of scorn worldwide.
Refusing Treatment: The Trump administration is making it easier for medical workers to object to procedures on religious grounds.
The president has until the end of the week to either release the memo or object to its public release (which would result in a full House vote on making the memo public).
Yet it is government - created backlogs and delays and tight new rules that are the problem here, even if that very government has pointed the finger at its own employees on occasion to cover up its poor decision - making, and gone after conscientious whistle - blowers who object to being ordered to treat EI claimants unfairly.
The one I settled on was «making someone an object».
There can be no doubt that God makes decisions a propos of the disjunctive multiplicity of eternal objects; the difficulty is to establish in precisely what sense these divine decisions are distinguishable from the choices and calculations made by the Leibnizian deity Whitehead's dilemma seems to be this: on the one hand, the principle of classification is to be challenged by positing the primordiality of a world of eternal objects that knows «no exclusions, expressive in logical terms»; on the other hand, positing pure potentiality as a «boundless and unstructured infinity» (IWM 252) lacking all logical order would seem to be precisely that conceptual move which renders it «inefficacious» or «irrelevant.»
To make an object lesson, one nation in particular is on notice that it is listed as first for destruction.
They will not, however, reflect very much on what is the ultimate ground of this dignity, which turns the conditional into an absolute principle, namely that the «object» which makes the principle of objectivity an absolute principle is man, that is the person.
At the laying of the cornerstone for the institution on September 24, 1858, Bellows made a statement upon which those who object to the treatment of alcoholism as a sickness could well ponder today, over one hundred years later:
It necessarily includes others as aspects of itself, but the essence of a self, a whole, is the drive to make something new and pass it on as a determinate condition for others, not merely to make an object determinate in the actual spatio - temporal nexus already (eternally) specified conceptually.
Now if I make a space - time diagram of a particle at rest whose boundaries are given by two lines and then suddenly accelerate it to another velocity, I see that if I push on one side of the object it immediately responds on the other side.
It is notable that in his discussion of eternal objects Mays makes but one passing reference to Whitehead's main work (PW 77/79), particularly since his book purports «to be a commentary on some of the more important aspects of Process and Reality» (PW 13/8).
On the face of it Santayana rejects all three of these departures from the tradition, since (1) he makes no very explicit move from a continuant to an event ontology, (2) regards the inherent nature of an object as a matter of the individual eternal essence which it actualizes and (3) regards the distinction between matter and form as at least a virtually inevitable way of expressing the obscure manner in which one state of things takes over from another (see RB 278 - 284).
... [Americans] have become a nation that may defy every foe but that most dangerous of foes, herself, destined to a majestic future if she will shun the excess and perversion of the principles that made her great, prate less about the enemies of the past and strive more against the enemies of the future, resist the mob and the demagogue as she resisted Parliament and King, rally her powers from the race for gold and the delirium of prosperity to make firm the foundations on which that prosperity rests, and turn some fair proportion of her vast mental forces to other objects than material progress and the game of party politics.
since the Sun is the biggest object in our solar system, it makes sense that it would have the strongest gravitational pull, just as it makes sense that we weigh less / have less gravity on the moon since it is not as large or as dense as the Earth.
Actually, fishon, when men walked on the moon they placed reflective discs on it and independent experimenters can shoot a laser beam to those spots and reflect them back to earth, proving definitively that there are man - made objects on the moon.
Someone may object that, given the current weakness of our political parties, politicians necessarily have to turn to interest groups for their ready - made mailing lists and rely on «fat cat» contributors for large campaign donations.
Our Constitution, on this view, promotes an individualism that is ultimately indifferent to the object of choice because it is choice alone, and the dignity of making choices, that separates man from other forms of existence.
I take it as granted on all sides that while the arrow is a man «made object and thus irreducibly complex, Thomas is focusing not on its manufacture but on its motion as an otherwise inert object.
As an Atheist my uncle doesn't object to God and religion because even though he doesn't believe, he feels it makes life a little safer in his community, rationalizing that some may be diverted from crime based on their fear of God.
On the contrary, it makes possible a genuine objectivity, wherein an interpretation is only able to grasp its object and penetrate it in a relation in which the interpreter reflects on the object and himself at the same time as moments of an objective structure that likewise encompasses both and makes them possiblOn the contrary, it makes possible a genuine objectivity, wherein an interpretation is only able to grasp its object and penetrate it in a relation in which the interpreter reflects on the object and himself at the same time as moments of an objective structure that likewise encompasses both and makes them possiblon the object and himself at the same time as moments of an objective structure that likewise encompasses both and makes them possible.
Specific notions of deity, and of divine action, that have figured in theistic conceptual systems of long - past civilizations have certainly been influenced by then - prevailing technology — the ways in which people made their living.5 In our own time, recent developments in technology and in science have had major influence on how the object of religion is conceived, at least for some theists.6 Whitehead wrote:
But there is a Biblicism that is not theological because it does not make God so much as Scriptures the object of its interest, and which depends for law and grace not on Father, Son and Holy Spirit but on Bible.
Obviously you don't realize that an asteriod the size of just the Empire State Building that actually makes it to the surface of the earth at the average speed of most objects coming from the asteroid belt in our solar system would cause enough destruction and devastation on earth to wipe out most if not all of the planet.
The process of research is one based entirely on the analysis of light, calling for miracles of patience, ability and acumen; but it is astonishingly fruitful, since it enables exact measurements to be made of the mass, energy, diameter, distance and movement of objects vast in themselves but ultra-microscopic to us because of their remoteness.
On the basis of this formulation I suggest that the relation between God and the eternal objects can be restored to the situation we found in Religion in the Making, namely, that it belongs to no totally different mode from that of other actual entities to the eternal objects.
A few days after the White House objected to the comments he made to Amanpour, Franklin Graham appeared on Fox News.
Everyone at some time in their life makes a bad decision, like sticking your tongue on a frozen metal object.
The fact that the Old Testament may be an object of investigation in 1) church seminaries and divinity schools; 2) undergraduate departments of religion; 3) Near Eastern language and civilization programs; 4) archaeological institutes; 5) comparative literature studies; 6) English classes; or 7) anthropology departments makes for a considerably diverse angle of vision on the subject.
In his letter of December 10, 1934 Brightman shares Hartshorne's worry, «that other selves are merely inferred but never given,» and goes on to present his own empiricist colors «I'd like to be able to make sense out of the idea of a literal participation in other selves... whenever I try, I find myself landed in contradiction, in epistemological chaos, and in unfaithfulness to experience...» Brightman's argument is that any «intuition» (for him a synonym for «experience»), «is exclusively a member of me,» but the object of that intuition is «always problematic and distinct from the conscious experience which refers to it.»
If you can't make a case for a discipline on the basis of the actual objects studied by that discipline, it's doomed.
Furthermore, it distinguishes theological inquiry from intellectual activities that may be motivated by love of God and neighbor but that abstract their objects from their God - relatedness, «focusing attention on some part or aspect of creation without making them objects of devotion».
Like Mehta, Lewis objected to God on the basis of the evil he saw in the world, but his conversion mirrored that of Leah's as he realised that his objection only made sense if a moral realm existed: «My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust.
Thus, alongside of the church militant with its prisons, dragonnades, and inquisition methods, we have the church fugient, as one might call it, with its hermitages, monasteries, and sectarian organizations, both churches pursuing the same object — to unify the life, (On this subject I refer to the work of M. Murisier [Les Maladies du Sentiment Religieux, Paris, 1901], who makes inner unification the mainspring of the whole religious life.
The general point that has been made is that in the new conditions of the modern world the comparative study of religion has moved into a new phase — first, in that the object of inquiry has on a quite new scale been seen to be communities of persons.
On my interpretation, the point that he is here making pertains to the fact that phenomenal sense objects somehow cohere in such a way that perceptual objects may be given to awareness.
It is a basis on and from which the world of objects is made» (ETR 411).
As we noted above, in the chapter on God in Science and the Modern World, Whitehead presents God as envisaging the possibilities of value as the principle of limitation but he makes no mention of God's envisaging the eternal objects.
If I think of my wife as an object I am sinning against her.I have very rarely experienced love making with my wife even for a moment outside of lust, I find it difficult to even focus on her much of the time.
I can't find any food processors which mention nut butters or breaking down hard objects such as nuts, so I'm finding it really difficult to make a decision on which one.
I've been making breads by hand for a few months now, but got a Kitchenaid stand mixer (which I have named Julia, because I enjoy naming inanimate objects and the first recipe I used it for was from Mastering the Art of French cooking) for my 15th birthday last week and can't wait to use it to take on more complex breads.
The UAV also carries an onboard camera that turns on when an object is detected, and this allows a remote human observer to make a judgement call and adjust the flight path or plan accordingly.
To make the tofu sliders: Wrap the tofu tightly in kitchen or paper towels and place a heavy object on top (ex: a can of soup or a few cookbooks).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z