Sentences with phrase «on opponents attacking»

Xhaka needs competition from Wilshere or coquelin depending on opponents attacking strength, coquelin for stronger sides...........

Not exact matches

From there, the president descended into a series of attacks on his opponents and a defense of his administration... among other things, taking credit for driving North and South Korea together for the Olympics.

You try to dodge attacks by sliding left and right, and I think you attack by tapping on your opponent.

From his inflammatory comments about immigration and women to attacks on other politicians and countries around the world, Donald Trump has continued to infuriate his Republican opponents and create joy among Democrats and the media.

In fact, throughout the election season, it has appeared that Republicans have fielded more attacks from their supposed friends on the right than their political opponents on the left.

With the vote on the horizon, the Harper government came under attack Friday by its political opponents.

After seeing the absolute weirdest political commercial of this campaign season — Cook County Assessor Joe Berrios» attack on his primary opponent's record on guns — you will have questions.

The message also includes an attack on his opponent Ron Liepert for musing about introducing a Provincial Sales Tax while he was Alberta's Finance minister.

A former adviser recalls heated conference calls in which campaign brass urged him to green - light an attack ad on his Democratic opponent, John Gregg.

By better understanding orthodoxy's opponents, we more clearly see what was at stake in its attacks on «heresy.»

Luther did not bother to refer to the fact that he was in the middle of a 40,000 - word Latin text, entitled «Against Latomus», replying to an attack on him by an old opponent at Louvain.

Disraeli and Gladstone had long been rivals and when Gladstone successfully attacked his opponent's policies in Turkey Disraeli turned on him and called him «a sophistical rhetorician, inebriated with the exuberance of his own verbosity.»

So, when opponents say that gaay marriage is an attack on traditional marriage they are correct aren't they?

Unlike Barcelona, we don't have a Messi, Iniesta, Xavi or even Busquet to play «tiki taka», build on fast attacks from the midfield to penetrate the opponents defense and produce a magical moment week in week.

A very intersting choice but how far will he go to win especially after his ban for throwing a second ball on the pitch to stop an opponents counter attack; recall that replay with sheffield because Kanu scored by going against the fair play rules.

we used to be so good on the counter attacks now we want to take our time to get to the other side as if the opponents are walking behind us.

as for me ozil is a talented and skilful player but having only that is not enough to win the ever getting stronger premier leage teams, he has to train hard for endurance and be a fighter, he has to come back and press on the opponent defense and even midfieldes to disposes the ball when arsenal loose the ball and go back fast attacking like iwobi and welbeck are doing.

I wish I could say that we are an attacking threat that inflicts fear on our opponents but unfortunately, we are not.

Point being sometimes attack is the best form of defending, much more so this season when you see City and Pool putting so much pressure on their opponents whenever we push forward.

With the bulk of the game now being played out in their own half Hertha's only real hope of stealing the three points lay on exposing their opponents faults on the counter attack and ten minutes remaining they very almost did only for Nico Schulz to spurn a glorious chance which was created by veteran Ivory Coast front man Salomon Kalou.

To be honest I would allow sanchez and ozil to roam freely in attack, in other words sanchez could come wide in some attacks, make runs through the middle in others etc, and the same with ozil, can come out wide to collect the ball or roam into the middle to feed sanchez and walcott through balls to run on to... In the attacking sense it does nt really matter to me, they both are good in different aspects so they could be used for different roles against different opponents.

This is a huge positive and it is important that we focus on the future rather than the Chelsea loss because our next opponent is Southampton and they have added Charlie Austin to their attack.

Look back to the beginning of Weger's reign; the saing was that a corner for the opponents was a goal scoring opportunity for Arsenal — we were so quick on the counter attack... Too bad Walcott didn't get enough time last season to fine tune his runs with Özil's sweet, left foot.

logic costa knows how to play jose's brand football as deigo plays the same brand ie hit ur opponents on counter attack... while cesc know total possession or arsene's mixed breed

best formation is 4 -5-1, high pressure and fast counter attack, something like Klopp did with BvB seasons ago, Ozil vision, Walcott speed and Sanchez class can defeat anyone, passing is good but when opponent like Watford just sit and wait its hard to pass and score, start game with high pressure and fast counters than in second half start playing pass game, so with right balance it could be done, something we did against Liverpool last year on Emirates, first half high pressure and counter while in second half passing and controling game.

I think we need to work on defending counter attacks, stopping opponents creating chances, protecting the lead and stop opponents playing aggressive against us.

Since Le Coq started playing, we have not been hit on the counter, the opponents either attack down the flanks or high long balls towards our box

Before he becomes the subject of on - pitch attack by opponent players and managers game plans like «OPERATION - TARGET - SANCHEZ».....

I wonder why we keep running back when opponent is on the attack.

An ideal scenario would be to utilize Welbeck's physical strength, play it into his feet, and let him hold it up for the others to join in on the attack; if that isn't going to happen, however, Arsenal could continue to struggle to pose a serious threat to their opponents.

2) Invitation to attack us — Arsenal football philosophy had quietly shifted and now we were inviting opponents to come and attack us as they would see we were not operating in full attack gears and it was easy for them to get into our defending side of the pitch much quicker as they countered lesser bodies on the way.

I know we need to develop how we play against opponents, both against Everton and Leicester we got hit on the counter, and didn't have the right type of players to control an attack at us with pace.

Arsenal in the past have been accused of being a bit naïve in the way they approach the massive Premier League games, as Arsene Wenger seems to build his gameplan around attacking his opponents and place relatively less emphasis on good defending.

Defend deep and try and catch our opponents out with the long ball with our fastest attacks getting on the end of it.

On the attack, however, he rarely positioned himself to punch, and when he did it was only to contain his opponent.

Whether we play counter attacking or possession based football depends entirely on our opponents.

Arsenal became the first Top 7 team to concede 20 goals this season against Southampton on Sunday, and in fact they would just make the top 10 if we were judged on the amount of goals you let in, but obviously an attacking team like Wenger's Arsenal always work on the premise that they will score more than their opponents.

It has evolved into full - on armor, less a method of protection at this point, and more a weapon, a point of attack driven into the opponent.

Opponents know they can score on him, so they attack him even when he stays back.

Hence my call for Jansson but then we will be short for a defender from my own analysis of the season we were shay in the attacking department and we were gifting opponents goals on set pieces so we need 2 players whether we have the funds or not a defender and a striker are very much essential requirements to progress a head

Arsenal, for their part, were happy to wait for their opponents» attacks to break down, and sealed the game with two further goals on the break.

He does not take the ball to the opponent to mount pressure on them but give room for the opponent to settle down on the game and mount pressure on us, but with player like Sanchez on the attack unsettle defenders to make mistake that can lead to goal, we can see that in Chelsea game.

I don't even know why he started Welbeck ahead of Walcott in the first place, Welbeck was giving away the ball too often on the right and wasn't helping Bellerin in defence.Bellerin too can't be blameless for being caught out of position many times, he didn't even know who he was marking.The reason why we lost the midfield battle wasn't because Coquelin didn't do much, the problem was with Ramsey and Cazorla, they were loosing possesion too often in our own half giving more room for counter attack Coquelin alone couldn't contain opponent's pressure for the full 90minutes he needed help too defencively from Ramsey who didn't give him any, Ramsey now sees himself as an AM who could go forward at anytime and ignore his defensive responsibility.Koscielny didn't do much to prevent the second goal.

We should get back to our pressing game this will shrink the spaces the opponents can use and play into our hands of using our speed on counter attacks when we win the ball back in our own half.

What we got was things going off the rails from the start — Cena hit his finisher on four opponents before Styles decided against running right into one, and then it was signature moves and finishers and false finishes due to interference and brutal attacks on the outside and broken announce tables and stairs getting thrown and Corbin did throw someone into the crowd, but alas, did not then use a fan as a weapon.

Our opponents will pee in their Jerseys and will limit attacking us from the right for fear of being hit by a bolt of lightning on the counter.

Jack and Rambo might have it all in their DNA, but on the field, both are tent to attack rather than defense, making gap on opponents counter attack.

Also very rarely do we see them really tear into an opponent and rack up huge scores as great attacks can do when they are on form.

Ankle sprains usually occur at the net when a players lands on the foot of an opponent or a teammate after blocking or attacking the ball.

He is good but given that the focal point of the attack for Arsenal is Giroud, he won't fair well, I've always said if you where to give our «wingers» artistic license to play as inside forwards instead of on the overlap trying to cross it in to Gioud they will be a he'll of a lot better, Walcott and Ox preseason and Campbell world cup and Alexis Sanchez Copa America and now Gnabry are all self evident having a deep lying forward / target man is impeding their ability to perform well because there spending 70 % of the time trying to cross instead of run at opponents