Sentences with phrase «on other climate blogs»

Firstly, as we read on some other climate blogs also, it is very apparent that either (a) a planet's temperature is primarily determined by incident solar radiation, or (b) it isn't.

I'm afraid that much of the strength of the reaction to your questions was based on past experiences - I can not count how many times someone has commented here and on other climate blogs claiming despite the evidence that mismatches between specific projections and observed temperatures somehow invalidate all climate modeling, despite the projected emissions not matching actuals.

Not exact matches

Let me amplify on # 37: here's the other RealClimate link (that James» blog point to) I should have put in my comment about climate sensitivity and how uncertainty in aerosols relates to future climate projection: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=115.

It's hard to know just how far this view has seeped into mainstream climate scepticism, but the themes of corrupt science and cheating and lying climate scientists are widely disseminated on sceptic blogs and other outlets.

Seattle, WA About Blog Find stories on land use, climate change, air and water quality, radiation, toxins and other environmental issues.

«I'll say this t the public Mr Interviewer, anyone who believes that the information on blogs like Judith Curry's and appearances by Lord Monckton is based on the scientific facts as contained in the IPCC reports and thousands of other Papers prodcued by 27,000 people in the climate field are fooling themselves.

Watch the first 1 to 2 minutes section of the UP Stream Pt 4 doco / research prject specifically being directed at all Climate Scientists about how important Values are, and why Listening to the community (the target market) is absolutely critical: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyRKTqsXfjM Watch how people (the general public) are treated by others (climate scientists included) on all climate blogs when they indicate they are not yet convinced of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «opinion»... and try and measure the level of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such negative comments about the sClimate Scientists about how important Values are, and why Listening to the community (the target market) is absolutely critical: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyRKTqsXfjM Watch how people (the general public) are treated by others (climate scientists included) on all climate blogs when they indicate they are not yet convinced of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «opinion»... and try and measure the level of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such negative comments about the sclimate scientists included) on all climate blogs when they indicate they are not yet convinced of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «opinion»... and try and measure the level of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such negative comments about the sclimate blogs when they indicate they are not yet convinced of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «opinion»... and try and measure the level of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such negative comments about the science.

Gavin Schmidt, the NASA climatologist and indefatigable curator of the Realclimate.org blog (photographed above by Keith Myers of The New York Times), has weighed in on the year of attacks, defense and reappraisal that he and dozens of other climate researchers experienced following the unauthorized release of folders containing hundreds of their e-mail exchanges and files last November.

The article and particularly the comments on «The Register» and myriad other loci of discussion (for instance, NY Times climate blog) tell us that until we can improve our collective understanding of science as a concept we can expect to encounter a lot of friction in any attempt to make progress in public and industry policy responses to GW.

The other would be to ramp up climate and space observations (instead of shredding budgets for relevant agencies), to boost the human capacity for resilience to climate extremes of all sorts, whatever the cause (a mantra on this blog), and to keep up a sustained energy quest to build a menu that works for the long haul — an imperative that is utterly sensible regardless of short - term ups and downs in temperature.

This shift away from CO2 - centric emissions debates is also evident in a group blog post by analysts at the Center for American Progress, who propose a «multiple multilateralism» approach on climate that, among other things, seeks quick steps on sources of warming other than carbon dioxide — particularly sooty Arctic pollution and gases already considered under the existing ozone - protection treaty.

Given the evidence that words may be relatively worthless in propelling change on energy and climate, other kinds of communication, from cartoons to folk songs to YouTube videos on geo - engineering, have as valid a place in the discourse as articles or, yes, blogs.

Daniel C. Goodwin (36)-- See Climate Progress, linked under the Other Opinions section of the sidebar, for critically negative commentary on that Nature article by the blog owner, Dr. Joseph Romm.

I have no idea what you are referring to, except perhaps that the rote regurgitation of long - since and many - times - over debunked denialist nonsense is mercifully (and no doubt laboriously) deleted by the RC moderators — unlike every other open blog on the Internet where any attempt to discuss the science of anthropogenic global warming is quickly drowned out by a torrent of pseudoscience, conspiracy theories, blatant falsehoods, and hate speech against climate scientists.

Hundreds of comments and E-mail exchanges took place in 2011 between Andrew, members of John O'Sullivan's group of climate science «slayers» / Principia Scientific International (PSI) members and other parties and many have been posted on the Global Political Shenanigans blog since May.

This blog — I don't know if you've read any of the other pages on it — is about climate politics.

Some years ago Dessler used to blog on other climate sites occasionally, and I had the chance to joust with him.

The hacker proceeded to comment on other, lesser - known climate change skeptic blogs including the Air Vent (run by Patrick Condon), as well as on a blog titled Climate Sclimate change skeptic blogs including the Air Vent (run by Patrick Condon), as well as on a blog titled Climate SClimate Skeptic.

And the same Richard S Courtney is discussed on several other climate blogs.

Given the scale of repetition of arguments on this and other climate blogs I consider any such duplication for the general good not just defensible but a blessing.

There are other blogs where the pure science is debated, and others have their own perspective on the politics of climate change.

On other blogs, one way to identify the climate skeptics is that they're the ones who talk in that dismissively pseudoscientific way.

If you've purchased offsets from terrapass within the last year (we're working on the honor code here), you're invited to put a terrapass badge on your blog or website to show others that you've taken action in the fight against climate change and global warming.

As alluded to in the blog post, three years earlier an article on the BBC about «climate porn» by none other than Richard Black, had interrogated, albeit sympathetically, the Independent's deputy editor on the noisy line the newspaper had taken with respect to climate change.

As a Fellow of the Geological Society of America (GSA), I periodically blog on their open forum and on their Climate Community website and among other things, I have been accused of «being on the payroll of the Koch brothers,» and when posting a link to Svensmark's video on clouds accused of doing science by u-tube,» and a few other choice things from so - called respected «scientists.»

There are some other good Antipodean blogs that regularly touch on climate change.

It adds a nice personal touch that, on balance, makes the site more inviting than the other climate blogs, no matter what I say about the views / conclusions that often get expressed here.

«One way or the other, Gleick's use of deception in pursuit of his cause after years of calling out climate deception has destroyed his credibility and harmed others,» wrote climate journalist Andy Revkin on his New York Times «Dot Earth» blog, adding, «The broader tragedy is that his decision to go to such extremes in his fight with Heartland has greatly set back any prospects of the country having the «rational public debate» that he wrote — correctly — is so desperately needed.»

For this reason, among others, this is by far the most credible blog on the subject of climate climate.

A recent study involving visitors to climate blogs found that conspiracist ideation was associated with the rejection of climate science and the rejection of other scientific propositions such as the link between lung cancer and smoking, and between HIV and AIDS (Lewandowsky, Oberauer, & Gignac, in press; LOG12 from here on).

No one on this blog or any other should ever claim that climate science is damaging.

On several occasions James Hansen and several other Real Climate contributors have corrected their work based on McIntyre blogOn several occasions James Hansen and several other Real Climate contributors have corrected their work based on McIntyre blogon McIntyre blogs.

Chris Schoneveld: Aren't most of us on this blog interested in the science of «solar influence» on temperature / climate along with the science of other influences (e.g., trade winds «driving» the ENSO) and accurate gathering of data?

Hence, the climate science dialogue on this blog and other written venues, allows me to express a viewpoint as well as to learn.

In that blog, I shared one example how I approached a successful author and organizer on climate change and other social justice issues.

Andrew Montford, who runs the Bishop Hill climate sceptic blog, former children's television presenter Johnny Ball and Bob Carter, a retired Australian geologist, are among the other climate sceptics that have appeared on the BBC.

It seems that we have seen similar #'s on this blog from other climate realists; 0.66 deg C / century, from Spencer maybe?

Or on most of the other climate blogs — on either side of the dance floor.

There has been an explosion of the term «circle the wagons» over the past few dozen hours, here, on other skeptic blogs and even at Real Climate.

Harvey hopes his team's study will compel more scientists to engage on blogs and other public forums, as his Pennsylvania State University - based co-author Michael Mann and a handful of other climate scientists have.

In this case, the diagram was taken from an article at Watts Up With That, entitled «Apparently, 4 degrees spells climate doom»; Google's «search by image» shows it has also appeared on a range of other blogs.

On the other hand his blog (And books) is full of footnotes to peer - reviewed studies as well as interviews with top - notch climate researchers.

It is intellectually dishonest to devote several pages to cherry - picking studies that disagree with the IPCC consensus on net health effects because you don't like its scientific conclusion, while then devoting several pages to hiding behind [a misstatement of] the U.N. consensus on sea level rise because you know a lot reasonable people think the U.N. wildly underestimated the upper end of the range and you want to attack Al Gore for worrying about 20 - foot sea level rise.On this blog, I have tried to be clear what I believe with my earlier three - part series: Since sea level, arctic ice, and most other climate change indicators have been changing faster than most IPCC models projected and since the IPCC neglects key amplifying carbon cycle feedbacks, the IPCC reports almost certainly underestimate future climate impacts.

The debate is not about climate change, though it touches on the excess of the climate debate that have been observed on this blog, as well as in many other areas of public life.

(In other words, if you are a journalist, and you're unsure about where to go for a comment about climate change, you are doing the wrong job, and the discussions about mediocrity in the previous two posts on this blog apply to you absolutely.)

I completely agree, and have said so on this blog, that Judith has to tread softly because she is a respected climate scientist, and is still trying to reach out to those other scientists who have been caught up in the paradigm paralysis she speaks of.

Like many others on the climate blogs and including, I suspect, many posting here, I have taken the time to become well - informed and in doing so have reached my own conclusions.

About the other common AGW slogan according to which the current mainstream AGW climate science can not be challenged because it has been based on the so - called «scientific consensus,» I would strongly suggest the reading of this post by Kevin Rice at the blog Catholibertarian entitled «On the dangerous naivety of uncritical acceptance of the scientific consensus&raquon the so - called «scientific consensus,» I would strongly suggest the reading of this post by Kevin Rice at the blog Catholibertarian entitled «On the dangerous naivety of uncritical acceptance of the scientific consensus&raquOn the dangerous naivety of uncritical acceptance of the scientific consensus»

Paras 1 & 2 are off topic — but SM and others are held to account every day to wit, your post and the many comments on the other blogs (sometimes nasty) such as Real Climate.

There is at least one other climate blogger in Tamino's situation, i.e. not a climate scientist but with a substantial degree of relevant expertise, who maintains anonymity for the same reason: In this age of easy googling, they don't want someone (e.g. an NSF grant manager) checking up on their professional activities only to find mostly just climate blog material, none of which is strictly relevant to their career and often gets a little, um, unprofessional in tone if not content.