Sentences with phrase «on personal data protection»

The event has a particular focus on personal data protection and the challenges faced by data protection officers (DPOs) in Singapore.

In accordance with the legal provisions on personal data protection, and especially with Articles 38 and 40 of the French Act on Information Technology, Data Files and Civil Liberties, you have the right to access, modify, rectify and delete your personal data.

Not exact matches

• BigID Inc., a New York - based company focused on enterprise data protection and privacy for personal data, raised $ 14 million in Series A funding.

These frameworks were designed by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the European Commission and Swiss Administration to provide companies on both sides of the Atlantic with a mechanism to comply with data protection requirements when transferring personal data from the European Union and Switzerland to the United States in support of transatlantic commerce.

We require Service Providers to whom we disclose Personal Information and who are not subject to laws based on the European Union Data Protection Directive to contractually agree to provide at least the same level of protection for Personal Information as is required by the relevant Safe Harbor pProtection Directive to contractually agree to provide at least the same level of protection for Personal Information as is required by the relevant Safe Harbor pprotection for Personal Information as is required by the relevant Safe Harbor principles.

The Teachout - Wu tech policy emphasizes investments in Internet infrastructure, protection of personal data, new regulatory approaches to innovative companies and an emphasis on open government.

EU citizens also enjoy legal protections of the EU law, [7] specifically the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [8] and acts and directives regarding e. g. protection of personal data, rights of victims of crime, preventing and combating trafficking in human beings, equal pay, protection from discrimination in employment on grounds of religion or belief, sexual orientation and age.

The Data Protection Act, which came into force in 1984, was designed to stop the misuse of personal information held on computer.

Subject to applicable laws in such other jurisdictions, we will use reasonable efforts to ensure that appropriate protections are in place to require the data processor in that country to maintain protections on the personal information that are equivalent to those that apply in the United States.

Some or all of the personal information we collect may be stored or processed on servers located outside your jurisdiction of residence, whose data protection laws may differ from the jurisdiction in which you live.

Subject to applicable laws in such other jurisdictions, we will use reasonable efforts to ensure that appropriate protections are in place to require the data processor in that country to maintain protections on the personal information that are equivalent to those that apply in Canada.

We guarantee the protection of our clients using anti-scam tools and confidentiality of the personal data they post on the website.

We guarantee the protection of your personal data on Lovessa.com and do everything in order to make online dating safe.

Subject to applicable laws in such other jurisdictions, we will use reasonable efforts to ensure that appropriate protections are in place to require the data processor in that country to maintain protections on the personal information that are equivalent to those that apply in South Africa.

Then, remember that these herpes dating sites reviews will provide precious information on how to register, fees and other important details such as personal data confidentiality and protection.

This set of resource includes: • 6 attractive PowerPoint presentations which lead the class through each of the lessons • Fun and thought provoking activities and discussion starters, worksheets and questions to reinforce the learning • 6 differentiated homework tasks • A mark sheet which allows pupils to track their own progress • An end of unit test to prepare the students for exams or can be used as a form of assessment • A complete teacher's guide including easy to follow lesson plans • An answer booklet to help the teacher along The lessons are: Lesson 1 — Looking into ethical and moral dilemmas such as driverless cars and the impact of technology on modern life Lesson 2 — More ethical dilemmas including the ratings culture, medical apps, sharing personal data and cyber bullying Lesson 3 — Environmental issues with technology and how organisations and individuals can reduce these effects Lesson 4 — The Computer Misuse Act 1990 Lesson 5 — The Data Protection Act 1998 Lesson 6 — Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 For more high - quality resources written by this author visit www.nicholawilkindata and cyber bullying Lesson 3 — Environmental issues with technology and how organisations and individuals can reduce these effects Lesson 4 — The Computer Misuse Act 1990 Lesson 5 — The Data Protection Act 1998 Lesson 6 — Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 For more high - quality resources written by this author visit www.nicholawilkinData Protection Act 1998 Lesson 6 — Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 For more high - quality resources written by this author visit www.nicholawilkin.com

All education establishments have an important duty of care for the sensitive information and data collected and used — obviously through the Data Protection Act 1998, but equally through the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, which adds new legislation on holding personal ddata collected and used — obviously through the Data Protection Act 1998, but equally through the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, which adds new legislation on holding personal dData Protection Act 1998, but equally through the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, which adds new legislation on holding personal datadata.

In light of the new EU General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) that come into force on the 25th of May, 2018, the correct disposal of personal information is more important than ever.

In addition, please note that we may solicit third parties to collect Personal Information on our behalf and in such cases we instruct those third parties to comply with this Policy and all applicable data protection laws.

Talking specifically about how the GDPR will effect child data, Piers commented: «Whilst the GDPR and regulator guidance makes it clear that personal data on children is worthy of special attention since they are potentially «vulnerable», on one level, the data protection principles that apply to the processing of children's personal data by schools have not changed particularly from the current regime under the Data Protection data, Piers commented: «Whilst the GDPR and regulator guidance makes it clear that personal data on children is worthy of special attention since they are potentially «vulnerable», on one level, the data protection principles that apply to the processing of children's personal data by schools have not changed particularly from the current regime under the Data Protection data on children is worthy of special attention since they are potentially «vulnerable», on one level, the data protection principles that apply to the processing of children's personal data by schools have not changed particularly from the current regime under the Data Protection data protection principles that apply to the processing of children's personal data by schools have not changed particularly from the current regime under the Data Proteprotection principles that apply to the processing of children's personal data by schools have not changed particularly from the current regime under the Data Protection data by schools have not changed particularly from the current regime under the Data Protection Data ProtectionProtection Act.

You already have certain rights under existing data protection legislation, including a right to request a copy of the personal information we hold on you, if you request it in writing.

In compliance with the French law dated 6th January 1978 on information technology and data protection, Members have the right to access, query, change, and oppose the use of stored personal information about them for legitimate reasons or, in particular, to oppose commercial prospection.

«Hotel SB Corona Tortosa» informs you that all the personal data received through any form on this website will be handled with the most strict confidentiality in accordance with the entity's privacy policy as well as with Organic Law 15/1999, of December 13th, of Personal Data Propersonal data received through any form on this website will be handled with the most strict confidentiality in accordance with the entity's privacy policy as well as with Organic Law 15/1999, of December 13th, of Personal Data Protectdata received through any form on this website will be handled with the most strict confidentiality in accordance with the entity's privacy policy as well as with Organic Law 15/1999, of December 13th, of Personal Data ProPersonal Data ProtectData Protection.

«Hotel SB BCN Events» informs you that all the personal data received through any form on this website will be handled with the most strict confidentiality in accordance with the entity's privacy policy as well as with Organic Law 15/1999, of December 13th, of Personal Data Propersonal data received through any form on this website will be handled with the most strict confidentiality in accordance with the entity's privacy policy as well as with Organic Law 15/1999, of December 13th, of Personal Data Protectdata received through any form on this website will be handled with the most strict confidentiality in accordance with the entity's privacy policy as well as with Organic Law 15/1999, of December 13th, of Personal Data ProPersonal Data ProtectData Protection.

Based on the Personal Information Protection Electronics Act, electronic items which store data, such as, but not limited to mp3 players, cellular phones, laptops, cameras, and desktop computers are non-refundable.

With changes in regulation on internet content, personal data protection and online gambling restrictions — and perhaps more importantly, changes in how those regulations are enforced in international cases — it's more and more complicated to reach Russian audiences with games and other digital media.

I agree to the processing of my personal data in accordance with the law on the protection of personal data.

Koch Media may also disclose personal data to law enforcement, or the appropriate civil authorities to enforce legal rights and comply with the law, or to comply with an order from a government entity or other competent authority, or when we have reason to believe that a disclosure is necessary to address potential or actual injury or interference with our rights, property, reputation, operations, users or others who may be harmed or may suffer loss or damage, or when we believe that disclosure is necessary to protect our rights, fraud protection and / or comply with a judicial proceeding, court order, or legal process served on Koch Media.

This is consistent with the interests pursued by European data protection law — in particular giving individuals enhanced control over their personal data — but puts the EU on a collision course with the US when it comes to online freedom of expression.

The European Union General Data Protection Regulation focuses on protecting European citizens and, more specifically, their personal identifiable information.

On the basis of these judgments, it would seem that for the Court, the use of personal data protection as a justification for refusing requests for access to documents should be restricted.

Furthermore, when ruling on the second condition of Article 8 Regulation 45/2001 whereby EU institutions have a duty to verify that data subjects» legitimate interests may not be harmed by the transfer, the Court found that the personal data at issue fell into the public sphere of MEPs and as such required a lesser degree of protection.

Recently, journalists from all EU member states raised, for the first time ever, a joint voice before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) against the refusal of the European Parliament (EP) to give access, on grounds of personal data protection, to information on how MEPs spend their allowances.

She also advises clients on processing of personal data and data protection matters.

He practice focuses on patent, trademark, copyright, competition and personal data protection law.

Clearly, this move of the Parliament was inspired by the activism of the CJEU which had proved to be extremely demanding on the protection of personal data in the framework of the fight against terrorism in its famous Digital Rights Ireland case (DRI, commented on this blog).

* Collect and process personal information only strictly necessary to achieve the objectives of the product or service; * Provide clear and unambiguous information on the intended use of personal information, to allow users to give consent; * Create default settings that protect the privacy of users; * Include adequate mechanisms for obtaining consent from users; * Ensure that the control parameters of privacy are conspicuous and easy to use; * Ensure adequate protection of all personal data; * Providing users with simple procedures for the removal of their accounts and acquiesce to these requests in a timely manner.

Much of the current body of EU law concerning privacy (e.g. the Data Protection Directive 95 / 46 / EC) focuses specifically on the protection of personal data («data protection&raquData Protection Directive 95 / 46 / EC) focuses specifically on the protection of personal data («data protectioProtection Directive 95 / 46 / EC) focuses specifically on the protection of personal data («data protectioprotection of personal data («data protection&raqudata («data protection&raqudata protectionprotection»).

In November 2011, the data protection authority in the German region of Schleswig - Holstein (the ULD) ordered Wirtschaftsakademie to deactivate its fan page on the basis neither Facebook nor it had informed visitors that their personal data was being collected and used for the Insights service.

Given the scale of the data breach, the sensitivity of the information involved, the impact on affected individuals and the international reach of ALM's business, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner jointly investigated ALM's privacy practices at the time of the data breach and on Aug. 22, 2016, published a detailed and damning report that found ALM had contravened the Canadian Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act in myriad ways.

The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights says that everyone has the right to personal data protection in all aspects of life: at home, at work, whilst shopping, when receiving medical treatment, at a police station or on the Internet.

This has meant a new focus on information security that recognises that personal data is an asset that requires sustained protection.

Within this same context, we note that another action before this Court was brought in June of this year, in which it is alleged that Hungary failed to fulfil its obligations on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data by removing the data protection supervisor from office before time.

Article 17 provides that the data subject has the right to request erasure of personal data related to them on any one of a number of grounds including non-compliance with article 6.1 (lawfulness) that includes a case (f) where the legitimate interests of the controller is overridden by the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject which require protection of personal data.

The working party, which was set up under the 1995 directive on the protection of personal data, is purely advisory, and the European Commission is not obliged to follow its advice.

However, on Oct. 6, 2015, the Court of Justice of the European Union declared the Safe Harbor to be invalid, prompting frantic efforts to develop a replacement framework for transatlantic data transfers that would ensure that any transfer of personal information of EU citizens to U.S. companies would meet equivalent data protection standards to those standards that exist in the EU.

The Court also held that the Directive interferes with the right to data protection on the mystifyingly simplistic grounds that «it provides for processing of personal data» [36].

Cooperation in the field of policing has to comply with the requirements on personal data set by the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, the EU legislation on data protection, and the case - law of the CJEU in cases such as Digital Rights Ireland (Joined Cases C - 293 / 12 and 594/12).

In the meantime in the UK, the 2014 Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act was challenged before the High Court of Justice of England and Wales and declared invalid on 17 July 2015, because the data retention regime did not provide for adequate safeguards in order to protect the right to privacy and the right to protection of personal data laid down in the CharData Retention and Investigatory Powers Act was challenged before the High Court of Justice of England and Wales and declared invalid on 17 July 2015, because the data retention regime did not provide for adequate safeguards in order to protect the right to privacy and the right to protection of personal data laid down in the Chardata retention regime did not provide for adequate safeguards in order to protect the right to privacy and the right to protection of personal data laid down in the Chardata laid down in the Charter.

On the other, the EU was already busy tackling other urgent and delicate data protection issues, such as the adoption of the new General Data Protection Regulation, repealing Directive 95 / 46 / EC, and the Data Protection Directive with respect to the processing of personal data for criminal investigations, repealing Council Framework Decision 2008 / 977 / JHA, and the negotiations and adoption of the new Umbrella Agreement with regard to EU - US law enforcement cooperatdata protection issues, such as the adoption of the new General Data Protection Regulation, repealing Directive 95 / 46 / EC, and the Data Protection Directive with respect to the processing of personal data for criminal investigations, repealing Council Framework Decision 2008 / 977 / JHA, and the negotiations and adoption of the new Umbrella Agreement with regard to EU - US law enforcement coprotection issues, such as the adoption of the new General Data Protection Regulation, repealing Directive 95 / 46 / EC, and the Data Protection Directive with respect to the processing of personal data for criminal investigations, repealing Council Framework Decision 2008 / 977 / JHA, and the negotiations and adoption of the new Umbrella Agreement with regard to EU - US law enforcement cooperatData Protection Regulation, repealing Directive 95 / 46 / EC, and the Data Protection Directive with respect to the processing of personal data for criminal investigations, repealing Council Framework Decision 2008 / 977 / JHA, and the negotiations and adoption of the new Umbrella Agreement with regard to EU - US law enforcement coProtection Regulation, repealing Directive 95 / 46 / EC, and the Data Protection Directive with respect to the processing of personal data for criminal investigations, repealing Council Framework Decision 2008 / 977 / JHA, and the negotiations and adoption of the new Umbrella Agreement with regard to EU - US law enforcement cooperatData Protection Directive with respect to the processing of personal data for criminal investigations, repealing Council Framework Decision 2008 / 977 / JHA, and the negotiations and adoption of the new Umbrella Agreement with regard to EU - US law enforcement coProtection Directive with respect to the processing of personal data for criminal investigations, repealing Council Framework Decision 2008 / 977 / JHA, and the negotiations and adoption of the new Umbrella Agreement with regard to EU - US law enforcement cooperatdata for criminal investigations, repealing Council Framework Decision 2008 / 977 / JHA, and the negotiations and adoption of the new Umbrella Agreement with regard to EU - US law enforcement cooperation.