Precipitation affects growth, but in the far past you do not usually have data
on precip to factor it out and infer temp.
The impact of soot and pollution
on precip is complex.
There is a fascination (maybe obsession) with measure of ice melt extent with virtually no discussion or concern about the impact of an ice - free Arctic
on precip and temp in western North America.
Not exact matches
Precip patterns may be increasing the ice
on top of the hill, but melting around the flanks — even if an equal amount — destablizes the hill, allowing it to pancake.
There are a number of factors that control CH4 concentrations that are extermely poorly understood and are mostly ignored in the scenarios — the dependence
on other gases (such as O3, and CO), the impact of increased temperatures and changes to
precip on tropical and boreal wetland emissions, the existence (or not) of a significant methane hydrate source from permafrost or continental shelves, the climate impact
on the atmopsheric chemistry of CH4.
Let me see if I got it right: (1) With GW we're not sure of getting much change in overall global average
precip, but when when it rains it pours... & floods, which also means
on the flip side we would expect increasing periods of no
precip (aka droughts), since the global average
precip is not changing.
Further, precipitation over land is a small fraction of the total, so there's a lot of room for changes in
precip there without altering the result
on the global mean.
I figure if we split the difference
on the two,
precip will be same.
So the impact of GW
on TCs or
precip does not have to be very much to cause a tremendously greater amount of damage and harm.
Water vapor and clouds,
on the other hand, are highly active components of the climate system that re-spond rapidly to changes in temperature and air pressure by evaporating, condensing, and
precip - itating.»
And the «weather» right now, what with the jet stream way south and a weak lingering LaNina still haunting, one system after another dropping tons of
precip on the SW, sure doesn't appear to be fitting in with their projections.
Over large areas the addition of so much water vapor does have regional effects
on temp, convection and
precip.
I have seen very slow growth rates in larch from northern Siberia, but as you can see in the Salzer et al figure 4a the growth rates of the high elevation trees are ~ 0.4 mm
on average compared to ~ 0.2 mm for the lower,
precip limited site.
NOAA released a new report (Nov 23/09)
on the building El Nino event with numerous graphs projecting temps and
precip expected for NA.
If circulation patterns mean that you get more
precip on land versus ocean, then you could theoretically have the same amount of snow but greater coverage because if it snows
on the ocean you don't get snow cover...
We are supposed to have some mixed
precip all week and possibly a significant snowstorm moving in
on Wednesday into Thursday.