A year on from the major winter flooding in the UK, the new study led by Cardiff University sheds new light
on public perception of climate change.
Not exact matches
As with
perceptions of scientific consensus
on other topics,
public perceptions that scientists tend to agree about
climate change tend to vary by education and age.
However, I also feel that the conference and particularly the grand after - conference plans may have a significant impact
on public perceptions (reinforcing Americans» uniqueness in terms
of climate change beliefs and opinions) and that in turn can provide political cover for politicians reluctant to support tough measures.
They found that
climate change, fossil fuels, renewable energy and nuclear energy often did not take up much space in these books, despite having «implications
on introductory - level science education, the
public perception of science and an informed citizenship,» Rittman said.
Motivated reasoning has been used by Leiserowitz et al in a paper which interprets
public perception on climate change (Climategate, Public Opinion, and the Loss of
public perception on climate change (Climategate,
Public Opinion, and the Loss of
Public Opinion, and the Loss
of Trust.
Tell me, too, how someone who sees things as you do — all built into Bayesianism; no need to address whether the problem is different priors or different sources
of information relevant to truth - seeking likelihood ratios vs. a form
of biased
perception that opportunisitcally bends whatever evidence is presented to fit a preconception; no need apparently either for empirical study
on any
of this — can straighten out someone who says the key to dispelling
public conflict over
climate change is just to disseminate study findings
on scientific consensus.
It's easy for people to get confused about immense inertia
of public opinion
on climate change because advocacy pollsters are constantly «messaging» an «upsurge,» «shift,» «swing» etc. in
public perceptions of climate change.
Which coincidentally is the same PR technique that Friends
of Science is using to delay action
on climate change; creating the
public perception of a scientific debate in order to undermine support for the Kyoto accord or for any real
public policy action.
Finally, James Hansen's 2012 paper, «
Public perception of climate change and the new
climate dice», was important in highlighting the real - world impacts
of climate change, says Prof Andy Challinor, expert in
climate change impacts at the University
of Leeds and lead author
on the food security chapter in the working group two report.
To date, there have been no controlled representative experiments (or longitudinal studies) investigating the proposed causal relationship between
public perceptions of the scientific consensus
on climate change and support for
public action.
Previous research has identified
public perceptions of the scientific consensus
on climate change as an important gateway belief.
Indeed, in their much — discussed research
on «cultural cognition,» Dan Kahan and his colleagues suggest that
public perceptions of climate change at least partly depend
on the technological solutions proposed.
This denier pre-emption
of social science research echoes Frank Luntz» infamous 2002 memo advising Republicans to attack the scientific consensus
on climate change in order to erode
public support for
climate policies - long before social scientists began researching the link between
perception of consensus and support for
climate action.
It was that the
public perception of scientists, who may be good scientists and produce good science but then engage in trying to destroy the opposition or to inflate the dire consequences
of not acting
on climate change.