«I am making a film for BBC's Horizon
on public trust in science and I was hoping you may be able to help.»
This post is sort of a prolegomena to what I hope will be future studies that investigate the sociology and psychology of scientists and motivated reasoning, and its influence
on public trust in science.
Not exact matches
Since then, I'm helping to start a
science advocacy group
on campus
in hopes of improving
public trust in scientists and opening conversations between academic researchers and the local community.
«Information
on climate change ranges
in geographic and temporal scales, and is often hard to relate to forest management and planning,» said Patricia Butler, the report's lead author and a climate change outreach specialist with the Northern Institute of Applied Climate
Science, a collaboration of the Forest Service, Michigan Technological University, the
Trust for
Public Land, the University of Minnesota, and the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement.
The
Science Media Centre has its roots in the influential House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee third report on Science and Society, which wanted to renew public trust in s
Science Media Centre has its roots
in the influential House of Lords
Science and Technology Select Committee third report on Science and Society, which wanted to renew public trust in s
Science and Technology Select Committee third report
on Science and Society, which wanted to renew public trust in s
Science and Society, which wanted to renew
public trust in sciencescience.
Over all, he wrote, «My reading of the vast scientific literature
on climate change is that our understanding is undiminished by this incident; but it has raised concern about the standards of
science and has damaged
public trust in what scientists do.»
Postscript: Randy Olson has posted an interesting piece
on his Web site today proposing that the community seeking
public trust and engagement
on climate change would do well to study the practices of two organizations fighting for
science - based behavior in very different arenas: the federal Centers For Disease Control and Prevention and the National Center for Science Education (on evolution in the clas
science - based behavior
in very different arenas: the federal Centers For Disease Control and Prevention and the National Center for
Science Education (on evolution in the clas
Science Education (
on evolution
in the classroom).
On no more than the basis that «climate change is occurring», moral philosophers tell us what is right, social historians invent lessons from history to make climate criminals
in the present,
science historians invent conspiracy theorists, and psychologists tell us how to apply distress to change
public opinion, and why debate is just too risky to
trust to the
public.
This post examines the thesis that motivated reasoning by climate scientists is adversely impacting the
public trust in climate
science and provides a reason for people to reject the consensus
on climate change
science.
These attempts to mislead the
public may well have huge adverse effects
on the climate issue, the future of blue / red politics,
public trust in the press and
public officials, serious damage to the economy and the environment, and even whether
science will continue to be judged by using the scientific method.
These kinds of statements (and there are many more) coupled with apathy from democratically elected governments not wanting to commit electoral suicide and inactivity
on emissions cuts fron China / India / Brazil means that the climate debate isn't likely to develop beyond it's current level regardless of attempts to regain
public trust in the
science.
She was making a film
on «
public trust in science» to be presented by the next President of the Royal Society, Sir Paul Nurse.
«A lack of a clear, consistent messages
on the
science [sic] has a detrimental impact
on the
public's
trust in climate
science.»