But as I said above — you can't get any idea of what is happening without data
on radiant flux at TOA.
Not exact matches
We may — like the IPCC — draw the conclusion that the
radiant flux changes are dominated by cloud radiative forcing changes without information
on clouds.
Refraction, specifically the real component of refraction n (describes bending of rays, wavelength changes relative to a vacuum, affects blackbody
fluxes and intensities — as opposed to the imaginary component, which is related to absorption and emission) is relatively unimportant to shaping
radiant fluxes through the atmosphere
on Earth (except
on the small scale processes where it (along with difraction, reflection) gives rise to scattering, particularly of solar radiation — in that case, the effect
on the larger scale can be described by scattering properties, the emergent behavior).
For a sufficiently small amount of CO2, adding double the amount would have approximately double the effect
on radiant intensities and
fluxes — at all frequencies, at all directions.
Radiation transfers heat across different scales at different optical thicknesses for different frequencies; the net
radiant flux depends more
on temperature variations that occur over distances
on the order of a unit of optical thickness, so the net
flux can be through smaller - scale temperature variations.
JimD, BTW, I was curious how much impact the isolation of the Antarctic had
on global temperatures based
on the normal
radiant balance, so i did some quick estimates using the Meridional energy
flux based
on the satellite based SST OI v2 data.
The Wong et al plot shows the best data available
on ocean heat storage and toa
radiant flux pre 2000.
To close the energy budget needs data
on toa
radiant flux.
Now all figures
on the diagram are all
FLUXES, not a mixture of fluxes and maximum radiant powers as if against empty
FLUXES, not a mixture of
fluxes and maximum radiant powers as if against empty
fluxes and maximum
radiant powers as if against empty space.