There is just the effect of CO2
on radiative absorption, the effect of land use changes on albedo, and perhaps waste heat itself if you value completeness.
Not exact matches
The magnitude of the
radiative forcing per doubling is equal to the effect of band widenning, which is (BW1 + BW2) * depth of valley or height of hill, plus some additional effect in the center of the band, which is
on the order of 1/2 * (BW1 + BW2) * increase in height or depth of hill or valley; the central contribution could be more or less than that, but it will be less than double (because the shape of the
absorption spectrum won't allow a square shape in the graph of the spectral flux).
The ones that are most relevant today though are those that affect atmospheric
absorption and reflection of radiation, and surface impacts
on either
radiative or hydrologic fluxes.
In the tugging
on the temperature profile (by net radiant heating / cooling resulting from
radiative disequilibrium at single wavelengths) by the
absorption (and emission) by different bands, the larger - scale aspects of the temperature profile will tend to be shaped more by the bands with moderate amounts of
absorption, while finer - scale variations will be more influenced by bands with larger optical thicknesses per unit distance (where there can be significant emission and
absorption by a thinner layer).
But if the optical thickness in that band is sufficiently smaller than in another band (depending
on wavelengths), adding some
absorption to the optically - thinner band would tend to result in warming of the colder layers (as there would be less temperature variation over height in
radiative equilbrium for that band, given the same surface (+ tropospheric) temperatures.
Re my 441 — competing bands — To clarify, the
absorption of each band adds to a warming effect of the surface + troposphere; given those temperatures, there are different equilibrium profiles of the stratosphere (and different
radiative heating and cooling rates in the troposphere, etc.) for different amounts of
absorption at different wavelengths; the bands with
absorption «pull»
on the temperature profile toward their equilibria; disequilibrium at individual bands is balanced over the whole spectrum (with zero net LW cooling, or net LW cooling that balances convective and solar heating).
On the other hand, water vapor and CO2 have many strong
radiative absorption transitions in the infrared (as do also ozone, CH4, N2O, and a variety of CFCs).
«Exploiting Simultaneous Observational Constraints
on Mass and
Absorption to Estimate the Global Direct
Radiative Forcing of Black Carbon and Brown Carbon.»
Therefore, any
absorption band within spitting distance of 57 microns should be taken into account with respect to
radiative - transfer effects
on the energy - transport question; anything very far away need not be.
If that is the case and if the continuum is coming in from all directions, then there is no net
radiative power transfer going
on and in fact, one would not observe any
absorption spectra (or emission spectra) at all.
depending
on what I'm doing, I can do straight attenuation or do
radiative transfer where there is both
absorption and emission in a layer.
Vis.: www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1981/A1981LQ21800001.pdf Even more to the point, he goes
on to state that [quote] «The regions of validity of the linear, square root, and nonoverlapping approximations were considered in this article...» [endquote] and notes that the summary of the [quote] «various models and approximations for band
absorption» [endquote] given in that article had apparently been useful in many later studies requiring [quote] «mathematical calculation» [endquote] of the
radiative exchange by infrared bands.
The
radiative energy inciding
on our skin is absorbed by the molecules of water in our bodies by Resonance
Absorption.
This study seeks to explain the effects of cloud
on changes in atmospheric
radiative absorption that largely balance changes in global mean precipitation under climate change.
I read Nic's defense here, but I did not see that he refuted the argument I made
on his estimate of CS
on Stoat: http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2012/12/20/people-if-you-want-to-argue-with-stoats-first-read-enough-to-be-a-weasel-parrots-neednt-apply/#comment-24749 — It seems to me that Lewis» calculations are reasonable, but they lowball temperature change, ignore ocean heat
absorption below 2000 m, and high - ball
radiative forcing.
CO; 2 Observations of the Infrared
Radiative Properties of the Ocean «[I] t is necessary to understand the physical variables contributing to sea surface emitted and reflected radiation to space.The emissivity of the ocean surface varies with view angle and sea state, the reflection of sky radiation also depends
on view angle and sea state, and the
absorption of atmospheric constituents such as water vapor, aerosols, and subdivisible clouds affect transmittance.»
And, there is plenty of empirical data at every level: There is empirical data
on the basic
absorption lines of the various atmospheric constituents, there is a wealth of empirical data backing up the basic equations of
radiative transfer that are applied in calculating the greenhouse effect in just the same way that engineers and scientists use these equations everyday in other calculations, there is empirical spectra looking both up from the surface of the earth and down from satellites.
1950s: Research
on military applications of radar and infrared radiation promotes advances in
radiative transfer theory and measurements = > Radiation math — Studies conducted largely for military applications give accurate values of infrared
absorption by gases = > CO2 greenhouse — Nuclear physicists and chemists develop Carbon - 14 analysis, useful for dating ancient climate changes = > Carbon dates, for detecting carbon from fossil fuels in the atmosphere, and for measuring the rate of ocean turnover = > CO2 greenhouse — Development of digital computers affects many fields including the calculation of radiation transfer in the atmosphere = > Radiation math, and makes it possible to model weather processes = > Models (GCMs)-- Geological studies of polar wandering help provoke Ewing - Donn model of ice ages = > Simple models — Improvements in infrared instrumentation (mainly for industrial processes) allow very precise measurements of atmospheric CO2 = > CO2 greenhouse.