Sentences with phrase «on real evidence»

As for your claim of validation only through testing based on real evidence, this is just pure gobbledygook.

Literally every argument for PS5 being more than 2 years away isn't based on any real evidence.

Beyond these complaints, this 21 city coalition, the Journey for Justice, has presented a positive plan for sustainable schools and neighborhoods; a plan built on real evidence of what works both in schools and in communities.

He said: «They must now make a decision on our funding based on the real evidence about the difficulties our schools face.

I think that Ozil is just the focus of Owen's anti-Arsenal sentiment, because his ongoing campaign against our star midfielder can not be based on any real evidence.

However, making an assumption about his purpose for making such assertions like the one you just did is completely unfounded in reality and based on no real evidence.

Not exact matches

By focusing on outcomes for Canadians and making evidence - based decisions that are anchored in meaningful data and indicators, the Government is moving to a culture of measurement and impact, and is putting in place the tools to deliver on priorities, align resources to programs and activities that deliver real value for Canadians, and provide meaningful information to Canadians and Parliament.

Plus, research and anecdotal evidence suggests that spending too much time gazing at perfectly curated profiles on Facebook, profiles that often eliminate all the warts and stresses of a person's real life, can knock your self - esteem.

Topics included: early reporting on inaccuracies in the articles of The New York Times's Judith Miller that built support for the invasion of Iraq; the media campaign to destroy UN chief Kofi Annan and undermine confidence in multilateral solutions; revelations by George Bush's biographer that as far back as 1999 then - presidential candidate Bush already spoke of wanting to invade Iraq; the real reason Bush was grounded during his National Guard days — as recounted by the widow of the pilot who replaced him; an article published throughout the world that highlighted the West's lack of resolve to seriously pursue the genocidal fugitive Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic, responsible for the largest number of European civilian deaths since World War II; several investigations of allegations by former members concerning the practices of Scientology; corruption in the leadership of the nation's largest police union; a well - connected humanitarian relief organization operating as a cover for unauthorized US covert intervention abroad; detailed evidence that a powerful congressional critic of Bill Clinton and Al Gore for financial irregularities and personal improprieties had his own track record of far more serious transgressions; a look at the practices and values of top Democratic operative and the clients they represent when out of power in Washington; the murky international interests that fueled both George W. Bush's and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaigns; the efficacy of various proposed solutions to the failed war on drugs; the poor - quality televised news program for teens (with lots of advertising) that has quietly seeped into many of America's public schools; an early exploration of deceptive practices by the credit card industry; a study of ecosystem destruction in Irian Jaya, one of the world's last substantial rain forests.

These risks and uncertainties include, among others: the unfavorable outcome of litigation, including so - called «Paragraph IV» litigation and other patent litigation, related to any of our products or products using our proprietary technologies, which may lead to competition from generic drug manufacturers; data from clinical trials may be interpreted by the FDA in different ways than we interpret it; the FDA may not agree with our regulatory approval strategies or components of our filings for our products, including our clinical trial designs, conduct and methodologies and, for ALKS 5461, evidence of efficacy and adequacy of bridging to buprenorphine; clinical development activities may not be completed on time or at all; the results of our clinical development activities may not be positive, or predictive of real - world results or of results in subsequent clinical trials; regulatory submissions may not occur or be submitted in a timely manner; the company and its licensees may not be able to continue to successfully commercialize their products; there may be a reduction in payment rate or reimbursement for the company's products or an increase in the company's financial obligations to governmental payers; the FDA or regulatory authorities outside the U.S. may make adverse decisions regarding the company's products; the company's products may prove difficult to manufacture, be precluded from commercialization by the proprietary rights of third parties, or have unintended side effects, adverse reactions or incidents of misuse; and those risks and uncertainties described under the heading «Risk Factors» in the company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10 - K and in subsequent filings made by the company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission («SEC»), which are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

President Hollande has already determined this to be a terrorist act - even before any real evidence has been found on Bouhlel's cellphone or in his laptop browser history on his laptop beyond a phone number alleged to be connected to Al Nusra Front's Omar Diaby.

That's why it's so important to complete objective and realistic sales forecasting based on historical evidence and real numbers.

It's probably not going to be possible to have a jury of people that have never heard of the bands, that have never heard the music, but the real question is, even with that understanding, can they only focus on the evidence that's being presented by the parties at trial and only use that evidence and nothing from their own life experience outside of the courtroom to make that decision?

«We'd love to proclaim these numbers as definitive evidence of a real downshift in the trend in claims, but it's even riskier than usual to put too much weight on single observations at this time of year,» says Shepherdson.

The FBI strongly feels they have evidence linking his real identity to that of the Libertas administrator position on the platform.

The number, still 16, then became politicized on October 3 when President Donald Trump visited the island and insisted that the alleged 16 deaths were evidence that Puerto Rico wasn't a «real catastrophe» like Hurricane Katrina.

Finally, the agency issued draft guidance on the use of real - world evidence to support regulatory decision - making for medical devices.

Housing Market Crawls Back Housing prices across the U.S. continued falling in March but not as sharply as earlier months, according to a report that offered the latest evidence of a real - estate market on the mend.

If Congress started to evidence real progress on tax reform, economic expectations would likely rebound along with investor's preference for value.

Early advocates of these type of tax cuts argued that lower tax rates would increase economic activity and thereby revenues. However, thereâ $ ™ s little evidence changes in tax rates, except in more extreme cases, have a major impact on real economic activity.

However, thereâ $ ™ s little evidence changes in tax rates, except in more extreme cases, have a major impact on real economic activity.

As to whether the stock market has put in a «real» bottom, Reynolds said he would like to see corroborating evidence of improving conditions, like the yield on the 10 - year U.S. Treasury note moving back up, and improvement in the investment - grade corporate credit market.

Conclusion In general, the historical movement of inflation provides evidence that real rates of return on T - bills will revert closer to historical norms rather than what we experienced during the Great Bull Market.

In the real world, we must deal with levels of certainty based on observed evidence.

@one one it is explainable, only that the REAL problem comes when you demand physical evidence which is practically impossible, like i said, God is not going to come and take us by the hand so we make our choice, we have to make our choice on our own without being able to physically watch Him

To pile on the ironies, Le Rider carefully demonstrates through a minute examination of the relevant evidence that the real Vienna was in fact nothing like the city that her artists and theorizers felt they were living in.

Just because they don't have the photos, artifacts or whatever to convince you personally doesn't mean they don't have real life experience as evidence to base their belief on.

Mike, «you can not show evidence of what you call real is not a dream so we both are just have to go off the evidence we have and make our choice based on the faith of the evidence.»

Christianity is based on faith and still we have a ton of physical evidence that God is real by the world around us and in our personal lives.

Is it possible you've been indoctrined to believe you know why and what I believe, despite having no real evidence to base those figments of your imagination on?

Unfortunately, the churches have no real resources to lean on, to give empirical evidence that we are the product of a Master Designer, just «believe on the Lord Jesus and you will be saved.»

How sad that you deny real evidence for a 2000 year old book that has never been updated and can be proven to be false on numerous things... a book written by primitive man to fool the gullible out of money and make them live in fear.

What has been expressed here is that * some * evidence does exist — enough to create a theory or hypothesis that reasonates with people's actual experiences, that fits the evidence and experiences they do have to go on and provides real, demonstrable benefits in the process.

You need to prove, or at least provide real evidence (scientific method, rules of evidence), before we can move on to using The Babble for anything more than fire starter or toilet paper.

Theocracy is based on studies of an old book or two written by philosophers and politicians in addition to stories handed down over generations with no real physical evidence to analyze.

To believe or disbelieve the historical accuracy of the Gospels, you must study them on the strength of their own historical evidence, not because of their real (or supposed) parallels to pagan myths.

For a Biblical concept of justice has been the real concern of a few of these writers.58 Evidence is of course mixed, but the overwhelming thrust of Scripture's discussion of «social justice» suggests the following Biblical definition: «to each according to his or her needs» Rather than act on the basis of society's most common definitions of «social justice» those of merit or equality - the Christian seeking a Biblically derived social ethic must respond, first and foremost, on the basis of need.

Even where Scriptural evidence seems on first reading to contradict this bias toward the needy, closer inspection reveals that no real inconsistency exists.

This historical result used to be frequently regarded as evidence suggesting that no real Christology could be developed on process principles.

I know that the burden of proof lies upon me to show how my thesis fits with Scripture, but I am beginning to think that the real burden of proof lies upon those who want to maintain that God is violent despite all the evidence to the contrary in the life, ministry, and teachings of Jesus Christ, and especially in what He did for the entire world on the cross.

there's been a lot of faked evidence — like the shroud of turin (which people still insist on believing is real — even after it's been shown ~ scientifically ~ to be a fake)-- and bits of toast with the image of jebus on them — but nothing credible at all in the way of substantiated real evidence.

but i didn't state anything example — i stated that the theory of evolution is yet to be proved and so with that i agree that due to that lacking it is equal to the theory of god... the only thing i said which is cemented truth for anything is that we don't know what the real answer is... and by stating ideas as facts serves no real purpose but a selfish one... lets call it an ease - ment on the inner self, the mind can now be at peace with the hope that when i die i get to live yet again... full belief in this is insane without evidence.

As long as there is no method of verification and no actual evidence, all gods are on equal footing, and everyone elses» gods are just as real to me as yours is.

If anything, they excuse the proposer from engaging real - world evidence on marriage and family policy or assessing the equality claims of sexual minorities.

First, there is no real evidence that I have ever heard of that specifies what day Jesus was born on.

Indeed, you have valid reasons to consider some evidence that many have overlooked but that may give you real insight on this issue.

Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz

The shroud of Turin is irrefutable proof of the Crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ, I am not going to state all the facts about this shroud but all the evidence is out there proving it is real and that to this day we do not posses the technology to reproduce a image on cloth with the same physical characteristics.

Policy decisions must be based on reasons, concerns, and evidence from the real world.

The justices on the current Court will do the real work of jurisprudence if they draw on the briefs, take the time to set forth the evidence, and show why the state or the federal government has a compelling case for casting around infants in the womb the full protection of the law.