Sentences with phrase «on real world observations»

Murry Slaby presents a compelling argument based on real world observations to support this alternative hypothesis.

I like to keep things simple and to rely on real world observations.

Science (which the models are part of) is evolving based on real world observations.

Not exact matches

Atheism is based on clear minded objective observation of the real world.

They grow up believing in an Eternal Hell of fire and brimstone, talking snakes, the Doctrine of Original Sin, animals in an ark, a Young Earth paradigm, the notion that people lived to be hundreds of years old a few thousand years ago, patriarchs that practiced child sacrifice and committed genocides, books that are supposed words of gawd that contradict real world observations, deities that kill their own children (human manifestations of their own selves) for the sake of sins that they never committed, the symbolic cannibalism and vampirism of a deity... I could go on for days.

Francis, a leading proponent of the theory that the Arctic can wreak havoc on weather elsewhere in the Northern Hemisphere, adds that the proposed mechanism fits «observations of the real world in recent years.»

We have already been able to make some interesting observations on real world chloride concentration changes over just 24 hour periods, illustrating the dangers of relying on single point, single time measurements.»

In theory, such epidemiological studies are inferior to clinical studies because they rely on observations out in the real world, where it is impossible to control for the variables scientists seek to understand.

Though working on a diminutive scale as compared to Rosenquist's monumental compositions, Steele draws on rigorous observations of the real world to create fragmented images that waver between recognizable form and nonobjective abstraction.

Nick's work seeks to explore the interaction and relation between man and nature through multi-dimensional abstract pieces based on observations from the real world.

«In his work Kelly abstracts the forms in his paintings from observations of the real world, such as shadows cast by trees or the spaces between architectural elements,» according to his biography on the Guggenheim's website.

I don't intend to hang my hat on the results exclusively, but to also be mindful that other real - world observations may either support the conclusions or provide additional information that forces the theories and hypotheses to evolve in a different direction.

It's something of an abstract concept, but with real world implications, and the universality of such physical models, based on things like radiative balance, atmospheric composition and density, distance from the local Sun, etc., is a very strong argument in favor of general acceptance of the results of climate models and observations on Earth.

A simple comparison of observations with projections based on real world climate forcings shows a very close match, especially if we take natural unforced variability into account as well (mainly ENSO).

I have been raising this issue for some time especially in my various articles for ClimateRealists.com in which I have been persistently proposing that on the basis of real world climate observations the effect of solar variability on climate must be the opposite of conventional climatology.

Since science is based on observations and measurements of the real world, it follows that a denier of science (rather than a denier of propaganda) must be denying real world data.

They can thus merely disregard contrary climate observations in the skeptic's lower «shadowy» Earthly world and skeptic's criticism based on lower «shadowy» Earthly logic; they can be discount across the board as less real and less logical than in their higher level «a priori» «ideal» reality and «a priori» «ideal» logic.

Because of the invidious domination by the politically - driven, I suspect climate science would have been better off without such models, allowing the participants to concentrate on observation, theorising, and testing in the real world.

Firstly, on a factual matter, the OHC comparison which I published above...... was not intended to be a comparison with real - world observations, only a comparison with the GISS E ensemble mean result, which should correspond to the reported GISS E temperature profile which was simultaneously matched.

This inconsistency between model results and observations could arise either becaise «real world» amplification effects on short and long term time scales are controlled by different physical mechanisms, and models fail to capture such behavior, or because non-climatic influences remaining in some or all of the observed tropospheric datasets lead to biased long - term trends, or a combination of these factors.

For example, when I pointed out the evolutionary theory and AGW are fundamentally different because AGW is a postulate that has yet to be observed in the real world but evolutionary theory is based on — and supported by empirical observation — you respond by saying to me «Basically, your argument boils down to saying...».

My comments can be assessed by reference to the actual observations of the real world since 1961 (mentioned above) which is when the Earth embarked on one of the highest periods of solar activity in the 400 year historical record.

As I have stated publicly on many occasions, there is no definitive scientific proof, through real - world observation, that carbon dioxide is responsible for any of the slight warming of the global climate that has occurred during the past 300 years, since the peak of the Little Ice Age.

Planet climate model, on the other hand, looks deceivingly real (honestly: model results most of the time look sooooo good compared to real world observations), always smooth, always there for you, no queues, no delays, lacking the difficulties, ugliness, incompleteness and noisiness of planet Earth observations.

Real - world observations indicate that elevated CO2 and elevated temperatures are having a positive effect on most corals.

3) However, even if the actual variance in TSI during that period was less than 4 Watts per square metre the fact is that various changes in temperature trend did occur and the shape of the chart would remain so on the basis of real world observations we must accept that the lower the range of TSI involved then the more sensitive the Earth is as a water based thermometer.

Since ocean temperature anomalies in the canonical Niño 3.4 region are now above 2 C — which are record values for the calendar month and not too far from their highest values ever observed at any time of year — current observations in the real world suggests that the models are very much on track.

Don't shoot the messenger but that is how the real world seems to work on the basis of observations.

My continuing disagreement with Leif here is becoming centred on one such real world observation which, if substantiated, is contrary to his view but accommodated by mine.

There is a deep literature on the basic theory developed from first principles, models, experiments and observations (in many areas of physics, chemistry, geology, biology), and a large published body of empirical geophysical and biological evidence from real world systems, the majority of which is consistent with this underpinning science.

Climate modeler Dr. Gavin Schmidt of NASA GISS comments on the failure of models to match real world observations.