Some theologians have relegated theology to the supernatural order; others, no longer believing in the supernatural, have reduced theology to feelings, emotions; and still others have given up
on religious talk altogether.
Not exact matches
Now, if you want to
talk about
religious theory, that's a different definition, as
religious theory is based
on belief and assumption and written statements that can not be verified or proven without having faith and belief.
Whether the critiques provided are correct or wrong,
religious TV and media gives us the opportunity to reflect
on our way of life and
talk with others about religion.
Even if you take the
religious aspect out of it, it is still interesting those
on their death bed want to
talk about family.
I remember watching his science videos in elementary school but now whenever I see him
on the news
talking about science it seems like he is politicizing science (when it comes to climate change) and promoting evolution as the only option to the creation of the world to try and discredit the
religious community.
I listen to how they
talk about matters of faith, religion, what they watch
on their favorite
religious tv programs, often listening as well to their radios playing their favored «Christian music» radio stations in the background, what are in the lyrics.
If the choice between fanaticisms, whether secular or
religious, is the only thing
on offer, the prospects for democracy are dim and
talk about civil war may not be alarmist.
They
talk about an attack
on religious teachings while speaking at an NRA event about how abortion is murdering unborn children while at the same time wanting to go to war and bomb thousands of innocent men, women, children, as well as innocent pregnant women with unborn babies.
also not covered by medical insurance, though some have sliding scales for fees), and - Psychaitrists (medical doctors who have specialized in psychaitry, are able to perscribe medications, and generally are not as focused
on talk therapy)-
Religious therapists (may, or may not, have professional training)- Community / Volunteer therapy (may, or may not, have professional training)
These are the folks who like to
talk about «common sense» and who, as we know from research is common among the
religious, rely heavily
on intuition aand believe all answers are intuitive.
Dr. Peter Boghossian, professor of philosophy at Portland State University, in a great
talk on faith - based epistemology: «I disagree with granting
religious delusion as an exemption, and I want to mention there's a budding young scholar here at Portland State University, Renee Barnett [sp?]
We are not just
talking about a convergence of disciplines, but of an authentically global synthesis in which the various forms of knowledge... find common ground in a shared personal and social vision... We must not imagine that the socio - cultural challenge of today can be met with theological thought that specialises in the content of doctrine or concentrates
on religious experience.
If you want to get a sneak peek at what the Christian community will be
talking about in 5 - 10 years, just spend some time
on a Christian college campus.From evolution to
religious pluralism to homosexuality, the issues that play out
on the national scene often begin in classrooms, late - night dorm room discussions, and chapel services.
I find any
talk of
religious nonsense offensive, so I guess that every god - fearing human who doesn't agree with me
on a CNN forum is a troll then?
To those impatient political enthusiasts who
talk loudly
on how futile and impractical religion must always be, and who are bent
on legislating human equality into existence, Kierkegaard offers a word of counsel, «Only that which is
religious can with the assistance of eternity press the equality of men through to its ultimate conclusions: the reverent, genuine, unworldly, true, the only possible equality between men.
They
talk against big government than pass their
religious views
on how to live your life.
Your insinuation that I arrived at my conclusions based
on your «
talking snake» is not only untrue, you are basing your opinion upon untrue information, your delusional bias, your schizophrenic
religious texts, and your ignorance.
Religious talk, like all
talk, begins with ordinary language, but, depending
on our purposes, it may quickly turn in directions more like the scientific or the poetic.
The so called
religious talk about their god's existence with certainty, then harp
on about faith is all that's needed.
One can not really
talk about
religious ethics, then, unless one is willing sometimes to forget about ethics and focus
on other, «higher» things.
From his inauguration as chancellor
on he always
talked of Vanderbilt's «broad» or «liberal»
religious identity.
As he thus
talked on, my mind rehearsed the life stories of some of these
religious folk whom he was thus berating, whose faith had been to them so comfortable and benumbing an anesthetic.
To understand this attitude we must go back to the last of his «
Talks on Judaism» in which he contrasts the false desire for security of the dogmatists of the law with the «holy insecurity» of the truly
religious man who does not divorce his action from his intention.
And though there were preachers and rabbis and other
religious leaders opening and closing each day of each convention, there wasn't an avowed atheist
talking up unbelief
on either convention's speaking list.
I've
talked with some who have given up
on faith altogether, others who have shifted allegiance to another
religious tradition, and a lot who (like me) are still a little uncertain about which road to take next.
Plus,
talking up
religious liberty is likely less of a turnoff for moderate voters than is
talk about bans
on abortion and gay marriage, traditionally the top concerns of
religious conservatives.
I've known hundreds of Jews in my life and not only have they never tried to impose their
religious beliefs or views
on myself or others, but I've never heard a single one
talk about how «great» being a Jew is.
who cares what
religious leaders say — they should have no bearing
on the real world — they believe in fairy tales and then expect people to listen to the - I don't listen to homeless people
talking to themselves either
If his church says he should write articles
on CNN about why the «spiritual but not
religious» crowd doesn't know what they're
talking about, I'd gladly retract my comment.
Writing
on his blog, Green admits: «I don't
talk about it very often, but I'm a
religious person.
Father Carrón, president of the Fraternity of Communion and Liberation, gave the closing
talk, in which he (disagreeing with Pink) doubled down
on religious freedom, speaking of a it as a fundamental human right, and attempted to synthesize how this freedom connected to traditional Christian freedom.
My sister, I know her Hair color Eye color Height Weight Birthmark Education Husband Children Where she works Where she went
on vacation What makes her happy What makes her sad Political views
Religious views Car she drives Dog and cat's names Her temper I
talk to her once a week and text her all the time
People
on here have
talked about how arrogant atheists are for saying there is no god since there is no empirical evidence, but I say the
religious people that are out trying to convert people of other faiths to their faith are just as arrogant.
The «seperated» U.S.A. has a president who was elected thanks to the christian right, who has gone to war after
talks with a god, who opposes homosexuals although I don't think homosexuals in general hurt him and who
on religious grounds has opposed science, wich could potentially help billions in the next few decades.
Unless you're
talking about the guy who was sticking crosses
on the graves of the Aurora victims, without thought or care of what those peoples
religious affiliation might be.
«If you
talk to people who've campaigned around the world for human rights and
religious rights, they would say that where we are starting is actually
on a path that could lead to the same sort of regimes that are elsewhere in the world, certainly in terms of persecution of Christians,» he said.
Just because we aren't
talking about debate questions or party platforms
on Facebook doesn't mean we stop standing up for the unborn, raising our voices for
religious liberty, caring for refugees, pursuing racial reconciliation, and more.
It is interesting that people who use Leviticus against the gay community forget the part that
talks about
religious sacrifices, making women sleep in tents outside during their period, the dietary restrictions placed
on them and how to cleanse a leper, all of which appear in Leviticus.
I don't even
talk to
religious people anymore... they tend to have lost all grip
on reality and I SURLY would never let them babysit my children!
I have not seen them
talk about the work of
religious organizations in Africa, India, China, Vietnam, Brazil, Mexico, and so
on.
That is, one might attempt to enlarge the scope of
religious language» neither insisting
on carrying one's traditional
religious talk into public discussion nor simply translating it into what may be the common currency of discussion.
Idiocy — The mental illness (or psychosis) is the fact that
religious people believe in things that have proven to be complete fiction (The Earth is 6000 years old, evolution is a myth, people walking
on water,
talking snakes).
As it turns out, they are
talking more and more about
religious revival, about the rise of new religions, about the worldwide resurgence of fundamentalism, about the enormous impact religion is having on world affairs and, in this country, about the increased prominence of the Religious Right, a movement which may already be the most powerful special interest group in America and which has given ample notice that it doesn't consider its job anywhere n
religious revival, about the rise of new religions, about the worldwide resurgence of fundamentalism, about the enormous impact religion is having
on world affairs and, in this country, about the increased prominence of the
Religious Right, a movement which may already be the most powerful special interest group in America and which has given ample notice that it doesn't consider its job anywhere n
Religious Right, a movement which may already be the most powerful special interest group in America and which has given ample notice that it doesn't consider its job anywhere near done.
So, we can discuss our
religious differences (those many gulfs that separate us), understanding that it is largely a waste of time (depending
on what our motivation is) and just enjoy the dialogue, or we can
talk about wine, movies, etc..
On the blog, we often talk about women in the Church, but obviously, religious views on gender affect both women and me
On the blog, we often
talk about women in the Church, but obviously,
religious views
on gender affect both women and me
on gender affect both women and men.
If anything, you should do your own due diligence to
talk to your child about evolution and its impact
on your
religious views and allow your kid to come up with his / her own opinions.
We must
talk about practical, tangible moral dilemmas, realities and virtues, and we must focus
on developing character in the midst of
religious belief.
The driver went
on and
on,
talking about death and spewing harsh
religious practices at us from the front seat (I can not recall what religion this driver hailed from).
The Universities UK document, which advises universities
on the invitation of external speakers to campuses, includes a case study in which a representative of an «ultra-orthodox
religious group» asks for male and female students hearing the
talk to be segregated.
Labour is calling for cross-party
talks on how
religious education is conducted and monitored in the state sector as a special poll for the Observer shows widespread concerns about the use of taxpayers» money to fund faith schools in a multicultural Britain.