Sentences with phrase «on science pointing»

Science Digest Magazine cover story on science pointing to the chance a nuclear war could trigger a «nuclear winter.»

On the science pointing to rising risk from unfettered greenhouse emissions, that may in fact broadly be the case (at least according to the «Six Americas» analysis by Yale and George Mason University scientists).

The bubbles, which you've seen here before, represent the size of segments of society that have fairly well defined attitudes on science pointing to a rising human influence on the climate.

Smalley's views are utterly at odds with Climate Depot's robotic propagation of any content — valid or not — as long as it casts doubt on science pointing to risks from human - driven climate change.

On the science pointing to a greenhouse influence, read Michael Levi's latest post, «How Likely Was Hurricane Sandy?»

Not exact matches

Eric Topol, director of the Scripps Translational Science Institute, pointed out that personal medical data goes for five times the amount that financial or other data does on the dark web.

Joey «Accordian Guy» Devilla does a great job at rebutting the silly attack on his blog, poignantly pointing out that, no, space exploration is indeed about science, and its Earthly benefits have been enormous:

When I was a senior in college I attended an inspiring conference at West Point called the Student Conference on U.S. Affairs, which paired political science majors with cadets in the hopes of building future civilian - military relationships.

He rationalized his decision by pointing out that science has surprisingly little to say on the question of why humans need sleep.

The points include expanding entrepreneurship training courses to arts, humanities and science students, making it easier for start - ups to get the cash they need, giving college students some breathing room on college debt, and making the incorporation process simpler.

Baybars also read up on business, technology, and science current events, as the interviewer makes a point to ask about the news, she said.

Asked to expand on this point during today's hearing, Kaiser said Cambridge Analytica's internal creative, psychology and data science teams worked together to design questionnaires for deploying on Facebook's platform.

Also be sure to check out this awesome infographic on the Beginner's Guide to Wet Shaving that provides more points on the advantages of wet shaving as well as the infographic on the Science of Wet Shaving.

Regarding Schumer's point on enrollments, the number of computer science graduates bottomed out in the 2006 - 07 academic year, with only 8,021 students receiving bachelor's degrees in computer science at the 170 Ph.D. - granting institutions tracked by the Computer Research Association.

Does anyone else see the humor in the creationists debating their point of view over the Internet (invented by science), filmed on cameras (based on science) in a hall lit by electricity (harnessed by science).

Everytime science has new insight the god of the gaps must step aside on that point.

My point is this: I don't rely on science to understand the things of God.

«4 Hughes points out that we must distinguish science from the opinions of scientists on non-scientific subjects.

At least, it tells me that they at least have the mental faculties to understand that numbers, facts, science, and proof aren't on their side, there's no point in disputing it, but there's also no point in trying to change their mind.

The point on which both philosophers and scientists have differed is whether only natural science tells us about reality or whether there is a reality beyond that which science can reach.

As Whitehead accurately points out, much of the conflict between science and religion stems from the reluctance, especially on the part of religion, to embrace adventure.

I try to leave the theology to others, but often folks want to talk theology on these points, not science.

To speak specifically on this point, the fact that form and relationship have been restored to the current image of man, both in the new metaphysics and in the sciences of man, enables us to be more understanding in our anthropology of what is being conveyed in such historically biblical notions as the Covenant and the Imago Dei.

don't think so... anyway I was trying to make a point... just because you decide to rely on science doesn't mean you know everything... just because I choose to rely on God..

By observing of the world stage on God's timeline, with all the man's advancements in tech and science, yet such corruption of human character, it only points to the fact that the time for the «man of sin» is at hand and his army is being prepared, for time of his arrival.

Granted, the believers are perfectly happy relying on scientists and science to — I don't know — talk to people around the world instantaneously via this comment board, and then get in their cars, and fly in planes, and use electricity, and watch TV — all of those things based on science, and yet, when someone points out that scientists have mapped the human genome and other primates and can show, irrefutably, where the different primate families branched off — well, no, no no!

19) of the Posterior Analytics, where Aristotle describes how the mind ascends to the first principles on which all science is grounded, he points out that the immediate point of departure of the inductive movement is not mere sense perception, but «experience»: «So from perception there comes memory, as we call it, and from memory (when it occurs often in connection with the same thing), experience; for memories that are many in number form a single experience.

My point is that creationism does not belong to the science classroom, because it is NOT science and us not based on scientific evidences.

To another point i can not defend either as being innocent as there are aggresors on both side of the spectrum who cuase the friction between the beliefs of science and religion leaving both at fualt.

Jeffrey Burton Russell points out that among historians of science «there's a strong debate going on between those who understand that the development of science is basically a Western European phenomenon, and that this is because of its Christian or Judeo - Christian roots, and those who maintain that religion blocked the progress of science until the 18th and 19th centuries, and that [science has] to struggle against religion.

Hobson is persuasive and straightforward on this point and on the goal of his research: «In the place of dream mystique,» he writes, «we aim to install dream science.

The subjective emphasis on reality construction and personal meaning has pointed toward inner moods and motivations — phenomena that elude the usual methods of documentation and verification in the social sciences.

(Maybe not... based on your ramblings I guess I should not take that for granted) But for some reason you have chosen to accept the revelation of science only up to a specific point in history and then no more.

Sentence two is the closest to an actual argument he makes, but it is a fact that science has little to no information on what happens after we die, as you pointed out yourself, we do not know (in the sense of having empirical proof).

In fact, when the 2007 paper came out, the commentaries in most scientific publications were quick to point out that, despite the success with adult cells, there was still a need to continue embryo - destructive research and that it would be critical to the advancement of science that research on embryonic stem cells continue.

Northrop observed such a confluence, and held that Whitehead and Berg - son differed only on one major point of doctrine: he alleges that, for Bergson, spatialization in science constitutes a falsification of experience, while he thinks this is not the case for Whitehead.30 There are two problems with this claim by Northrop.

Finally, it is a pleasure to read a book on science and religion that is not only well written and informative but refreshingly free of the point - scoring belligerence that often mars such debate.

Picking his way expertly through three centuries of scientific history, from Newton on gravity (the force that causes apples to fall and planets to stay in orbit is the same), through electricity and magnetism (aspects of a single reality), to the present search for a Grand Unified Theory, he argued that the coherence of the physical universe progressively uncovered by science points to a «unity principle» at its heart.

I find that science offers much better explanations for gravity, energy, emotions, evolution, the universe, and conscience, collaboration, photons, the evolution of eyes, and on and on it goes... I guess the point is... Prove that God exists, and we can talk.

@ let us pray just like to say it is great that you rely only on science (and assume you have a «higher» intelligence as such) but I'd just like to point out that science has no answers or purpose.

Ramsey points out that his position is similar to that of Max Black, even to agreement that both science and the humanities build on imaginative insights.

Based on the comments I received from my blog posts on the science and religion debate, I want to point Evangel readers in the direction of some resources that would inform the conversation because ---- with the exception of a few interlocutors ---- pervasive ignorance and fear seem to....

This point can be reinforced by looking at the engineering possibilities arising out of physiology and genetics, on the one side, and cybernetic computer science, on the other side.

You keep missing the point, most of science is not working on black holes and evolution.

From this point on, I make no apology for mixing science with science fiction.»

Best Point (nominated by Micah Odor): John Wilson at The Wall Street Journal with «No One Reads the Bible Literally» «What is at stake in these disputes is not a choice between following biblical authority on the one hand or science on the other, as the matter is often misleadingly framed.

His books, most notably including The Tipping Point, focus on unexpected findings in social science and not only make them accessible for the average reader, but also weave them skilfully into patterns and rules.

As David Griffin points out, the great successes of science have come from studying aggregates, such as balls on inclined planes and solar systems, where Newtonian mechanics or the Cartesian system applies (RS 24).

However, the Association of Christian Teachers has described the move as a step too far, speaking on Premier's «News Hour», Chief Executive of ACT, Clive Ireson said: «from a Christian point of view they're aren't nurseries; of very many of them that would be teaching it as a scientific fact during their science curriculam, they'll be teaching it during their RE curriculam areas and those bible stories like creationism need to be taught during that time».

Modern science and technology would have to be more modest, human rights would have to receive better grounds and be coupled with duties and gratitude, and the validity of a «personal point of view» on things would have to be recognized.