Sentences with phrase «on scientific understanding»

London About Blog Bidushi focuses on the scientific understanding of meditation as it grows, rather than on the substantial body of religious and philosophical work on the subject.

Whether to include a trend or not should be based on scientific understanding of the similarities or differences of the relationship over longer and shorter timescales.

So: what is an appropriate term for someone who ignores any and all evidence that does not fit with a preconceived worldview that is not based on scientific understanding, and who dismisses any attempt to provide a rational viewpoint as arrogant, elitist and / or fraudulent?

Generously supported by the Michael J. Connell Memorial Fund, the FSF program focuses on scientific understanding and policy tools required to manage forests for long - term biological, physical, and social sustainability.

The analytical report presents work in progress on the scientific understanding of global environmental change, as well as foresight about possible issues on the horizon.

Much of what we in recent centuries think of as moral is based on scientific understanding.

Students must understand not just what is known and why it is known to be true but also what remains unknown and where the limitations on scientific understanding lie.

As we also point out, the political response to global warming alarmism generated by the environmental movement has not been based on scientific understanding, but precaution.

But we don't wait for the science to be settled before taking action based on scientific understanding, because that would mean never doing anything.

First of all, the theory of AGW rests mostly on our scientific understanding of how climate works, specifically the heat - trapping properties of gases such as CO2.

We use effective fear - free and low - stress handling techniques, force - free and reward - based training methods, which are based on a scientific understanding of how dogs learn.

Hill's is dedicated to pioneering research and groundbreaking nutrition for dogs and cats based on a scientific understanding of their specific needs.

London About Blog Bidushi focuses on the scientific understanding of meditation as it grows, rather than on the substantial body of religious and philosophical work on the subject.

The reason that our free diet exercise programs are effective is because they are based on this scientific understanding of our bodies.

So, consider only free diet programs that are based on a scientific understanding of human nature.

«Such knowledge will, over time, have a transformative effect on the scientific understanding of human biology and on human health.»

It is based on the scientific understanding and high - throughput analyses of human immune responses to disease - related proteins in selected populations including elderly with the capability to stay healthy during the aging process.

Moreover, the issue entails cosmological assertions bearing on our scientific understanding of the universe.

It was not until the 1920s and «30s that mental hospitals in the U.S., even expensive private ones, offered differential diagnosis and treatment based, at least in part, on scientific understandings.

Not exact matches

While the notion of self - awareness as a route to self - improvement can be traced as far back as 600 B.C., she says, it has been only in the past four decades or so that psychologists and others have truly studied it — and tried to understand it on a scientific basis.

If you don't believe in evolution / the scientific understandings of the beginnings of the universe then the only reasonable explanations as to why your computer and so on works are that its witchcraft and wizardry.

Just a theory based on current scientific understanding.

A general failure to understand science also leaves kids less able to pursue other related fields that rely on appreciation of the scientific method as well as critical thinking.

As presented here, the hierarchical scheme shows why «scientific» models of explanation, based on invariant relationships between abstract properties, have failed to satisfy the historical understanding.

The challenge facing the church is to discard the unproven scientific theories of the 1980's and 1990's; to understand the scientific evidence that shows non-reverable sexual orientations; and to give the gay believer in Christ mercy to be married for life to the same sex spouse (rather than to continue to insist on the sacrifice of celibacy).

First, I would like to illustrate from recent times the effect of new scientific developments on the understanding of God in process theology.

Stephen Toulmin echoes these sentiments in an elegant statement on the cosmos understood on the model of our «home»: «We can do our best to build up a conception of the «overall scheme of things» which draws as heavily as it can on the results of scientific study, informed by a genuine piety in all its attitudes toward creatures of other kinds: a piety that goes beyond the consideration of their usefulness to Humanity as instructions for the fulfillment of human ends.

Anyhoo, as I stated at the beginning of this post, it certainly is an interesting subject about which to speculate as the scientific data continues to challenge our traditional understanding on this highly personal as well as socially important subject.

I have instructed the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare to: Appoint an advisory committee on alcoholism; establish in the Public Health Service a center for research on the cause, prevention, control, and treatment of alcoholism; develop an educational program in order to foster public understanding based on scientific fact; work with public and private agencies on the state and local level, to include this disease in a comprehensive health program.

As for normalcy, as we have come to understand it since the spuriously «scientific» and (at the time) wildly embraced Kinsey Reports, that had no bearing on the subject.

``... the future of Christian philosophy will therefore depend on the existence or absence of theologians equipped with scientific training, no doubt limited but genuine and, within its own limits, sufficient for them to follow with understanding such lofty dialogues not only in mathematics and physics but also in biology and wherever the knowledge of nature reaches the level of demonstration.»

During the four weeks they try to develop in the seminar participants as much understanding as possible, based on scientific knowledge.

This understanding of the limited scope of scientific method had been generally accepted since Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (1781); but in nineteenth - century evolutionary parlance it took on the specific meaning that «all beginnings and endings are lost in mystery,» a phrase that became commonplace in the sciences and social sciences as a way of dismissing or circumventing probing questions that sought to assess the larger implications or consequences of scientific analysis.

Leading thinkers have recently placed emphasis on the radical limitations of science and especially upon the inherent impossibility of applying scientific techniques to the true understanding and effective control of human beings both individually and socially.

Yet, with technology and scientific observation, we have come to see that there are things in this universe that were beyond our understanding that had definitive effects on our actions.

Reblogged this on A Twisted Writer's Thoughts and commented: I've never understood why we can't believe in both Creation and the scientific explanation...

I am grateful to Professor Patricia Benner of the University of California Medical School (San Francisco) for calling my attention to the model proposed by Stuart E. Dreyfus in «Formal Models versus Human Situational Understanding: Inherent Limitations on the Modeling of Business Expertise,» Air Force Office of Scientific Research (Contract: F 49620 -79-C0063), National Technical Information Service, February 1981, AD - AO97468 / 3.

As a medical professional, one would think you'd understand that biological evolution, much like general relativity, quantum mechanics, the germ theory of disease, cell theory, plate tectonic theory, etc is a scientific theory and should be taught in science class based on the preponderance of evidence that backs it.

They base their skepticism on their gut, their religion, their upbringing, and their elementary understand of biology, geology, and countless other scientific disciplines.

On the other hand, the church rightly understands that sin can lead us to use scientific advances for extremely evil purposes.

I have ventured into writing commentaries on the biblical books in Malayalam, approaching the Bible in two senses of the word, layman: namely, inadequate scientific understanding of the text but primarily concerned with response to life - situations.

The big bang does not state that something comes from nothing, and the rest of your argument is ludicrous.This is why Bill Nye is right - a lack of scientific understanding results in a nation full of ignorance and lack of critical thinking; not good for a nation that is basically making money by being on the cutting edge of technology.

You seem to have not been a part of the research process yourself, so I can only implore you to understand the process better if you are going to assert understanding based on scientific theories.

Alongside and dependent on the rich development of aesthetic, scientific, and mathematical distancing arose other modes of understanding man, which were called forth initially by the practical exigencies of political life.

It is also due to assumptions on the part of such critics as Bultmann that the actual facts could not have been as they are reported, assumptions rooted in an already outdated understanding of the modern scientific world view.

Although a clear scientific understanding on these matters will be long in coming, it is ignorance to say that religion is founded only on lies and its principles of faith have no adaptive or psychological value.

The statement, therefore, that everything is matter, has no precise sense on the lips of a materialist who is working with purely scientific methods, for in his system and with his methods he can not say what he understands by matter.

Salero seems very hung up on some very simple concepts, and yet it gets into trouble so easily by attempting to understand current scientific research.

Just as the scientific vision has understood that it is the preservation of the body that is the key to the preservation of our personhood — not an abstract, disembodied saving of our soul alone — so also Christian belief has insisted on the necessity of embodiment.

This interpretation can be criticized on scientific grounds because it tends to discourage the search for further understanding.