Sentences with phrase «on skeptic blogs»

The people predicting cooling and paraded on skeptic blogs are largely self - proclaimed experts who are just guessing using bizarre methods.

It seems that you got this impression from reading reviews of the report on skeptic blogs rather than the report itself.

Ah, yes but on skeptic blogs you'll find these seemingly reasonable people who think it's legitimate to debate whether or not it's cold enough in Antarctica ot make CO2 snow out of the air.

Amazingly, I find the same on the skeptic blogs.

But that is a far cry from the claim (and yes, that claim has been made, repeatedly, on skeptics blogs and public statements (e.g. Singer, Christy)-RRB- that Antarctic has been cooling in the long term.

It's also the one I'm presently curious about and if I can't get answers on a skeptic blog, then where else?

I'm not going to re post the whole thing here, but ask instead that you read it at http://www.buckyworld.me If you really are interested in engaging all readers, might this is the kind of thing you would use as a guest post ================================== Pat, you show such poor judgement to put this link on a skeptic blog.

As a commenter on another skeptic blog has observed: «the mere fact of the raid is «intimidating» (potentially) to many... Some are braver or better situated than others to handle police scrutiny but NO ONE should have to face police raids merely for having a blog.»

Not exact matches

In response to a post by a Twitter user which said Musk should provide «some very strong arguments in a well written blog piece to win over the (myself included) skeptics,» the Tesla and SpaceX CEO wrote: «Movie on the subject coming soon...» Now, why hasn't anyone thought of that before?

Even if 2 or 3 skeptics who spend a lot of time posting on a «faith and belief» blog don't agree, guess what?

I thought about the variety of faith backgrounds represented on this blog — Catholics, Lutherans, Baptists, Presbyterians, conservative evangelicals, agnostics, Mennonites, Methodists, Pentecostals, doubters, skeptics, fundamentalists, disenfranchised fundamentalists, religious scholars, and religious misfits — and all I could think to say was, «My blog attracts people who are in transition... or who have recently transitioned... from one way of approaching their faith to another.»

Grothe: It should be said Maria Myrback runs a blog — you should google it: fledgeling skeptic — so this story of her being a believer and turning into a skeptic is recounted on her blog I think we would all dig reading.

According to Ross McKitrick, an economist at the University of Guelph in Ontario, who was among those sending FOI demands to East Anglia on behalf of Climate Audit, a skeptics blog.

For example, if someone publishes a paper with a simplified model that assumes no feedbacks giving a mean ECS at 1.2 K, this will not push the combined estimate downwards (regardless of what will be written on the «skeptic» blogs...).

I tend to play the skeptic on the blog as an advocate for those who aren't totally up on the risks associated with collecting miles.

Richard Betts, the head of the climate impacts section of Britain's Met Office, recently left a comment on the «skeptic» * blog Bishop Hill stating that thresholds for climate danger, such as the much ballyhooed 2 - degree limit enshrined in recent climate pledges, were not determined by science:

Tom Fuller says «I find it truly bizarre that you (or one of the skeptic blogs) has not yet realized that weblogs are the absolutely perfect mechanism for conducting a proper debate on an issue like climate change

Blogs of those variously called climate realists / skeptics / deniers are hammering on the chilly conditions, presumably in hopes of fending off a new push to close out the climate bill in the Senate.

A common complaint on this blog is that nutjob skeptics claim that AGW is a conspiracy to ruin the US economy or otherwise ruin property values and the American way of life and so on.

I had (somewhat naively; o) hoped a peer - reviewed paper explaining some of these basic issues would go some way to preventing the promulgation of these arguments on climate skeptic blogs, but of course it didn't.

One of the stranger memes to come from the recent influx of climate skeptic / denialist commenters on this blog has been the idea that the developing world can't afford robust action to cut emissions.

What I am interested in is comparing discussion of the Cowtan paper, which to my newbie eye seems important, on this blog and on WUWT, where I imagine a skeptic discussion will crop up.

Similarly, I suspect that people on this blog would find things to say about the qualifications of skeptic posts here or on other blogs.

I see similar things on «skeptics» blogs.

I've been arguing with a skeptic on a different blog.

Climate change is one of the primary topics on the blog and, although Eric himself is very balanced in his approach, there are a lot of skeptics posting there.

Too bad these climate blogs (both skeptics and believers) focus on ad hominem attacks like this.

The list of skeptics on the EPW blog contains few bona fide climate specialists.

«Since they've descended on this blog to troll, I've found that many of the climate change skeptics here still think that tobacco has no link with cancer»

«Since they've descended on this blog to troll, I've found that many of the climate change skeptics here still think that tobacco has no link with cancer, still think that acid rain and the ozone hole don't exist, and still think that the DDT ban was just «The Man» trying to exert power over the little guy.

I'm a skeptic and I never saw the survey — and I'm around enough on these blogs that I «should» have seen it.

I've seen skeptics both on and off the blogs make some pretty ridiculous statements as well, but that doesn't lead me to believe anyone questioning the IPCC does so out of fear of a One World Government.

I am a Skeptic and active on most skeptical blogs for many years.

I'm a skeptic and I would have participated then IF that survey had popped up on any of the 45 + blogs I regularily scan via RSS.

A few days later, the blogosphere erupted with news of the hack of some 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, posted on The Air Vent, a skeptic blog.

First person that ridiculed me for telling the truth was» the Scottish Skeptic» on his blog.

As the blogs of skeptics and deniers were lighting up over the e-mails — «catnip to these guys,» as comedian Jon Stewart put it — Trenberth depicted the leak as a political move to influence discussions on climate change at the Copenhagen talks.

I've read the climate sensitivity papers written by Stephen Schwartz, who is taken to be a skeptic by many who comment on this blog.

This is actually pretty common in all of the blogosphere, and moreso in those science blogs which aren't focused (nor do they care too much) on climate science, but whenever some controversy hits the cables they have to put their uninformed hands into it, preferably to state for the nth time why the skeptics and deniers are such fools and shills for the oils and the rethuglicans.

Reporters need to actively ferret out these problems on a weekly basis rather than waiting until climate skeptics and blogs discover them and blow their significance out of proportion.

The hacker proceeded to comment on other, lesser - known climate change skeptic blogs including the Air Vent (run by Patrick Condon), as well as on a blog titled Climate Sskeptic blogs including the Air Vent (run by Patrick Condon), as well as on a blog titled Climate SkepticSkeptic.

As for the laws of thermodynamics, they would be violated by most of what skeptics (on this blog) say is true and they don't seem to care.

Scientists do have better things to do with their time than answer questions raised on climate skeptic blogs, and as a result, you will only generally be assured of a climate change paper taking a stance on the cause of the change if the subject of the paper is an attribution study.

I am not sure exactly what comparable films skeptics have produced that are similar, and the only example he can cite is Anthony Watt's blog post comments on the shooting of an eco-terrorist.

This week Slate (and Desmog blog) think they have the ultimate killer chart, on they call a «slam dunk» on skeptics.

Based on the number of comments that day and the average readership of the skeptic blogs, they had an army poring over the files in a race to find the next «juicy» comment from the climate scientists.

NY Times Disregards Times Staffers» Advice On Avoiding Term «Climate Change Skeptic» Blog Media Matters for America.

On other blogs, one way to identify the climate skeptics is that they're the ones who talk in that dismissively pseudoscientific way.

In December 2006 Morano launched a blog on the committee's website that largely promotes the views of climate change skeptics.

Curry has been engaging actively with the climate change skeptic community, largely by participating on outsider blogs... Alon...