June 24, 2014 The LAUSD school board adopts its 2014 - 15 LCAP, which improperly includes $ 450 million in expenditures
on special education expenditures as part of its prior year expenditure estimate, depriving high - need students of approximately $ 126 million in increased or improved services for 2014 - 15.
Not exact matches
This is a fragile thread
on which to hang the future of wheelchair accessibility,
special education and other public
expenditures, but Reinders argues persuasively that it is the only plausible way.
And we estimate the impact
on per - pupil
expenditure of the proportion of students in a district with Individualized
Education Plans (IEPs), as students with IEPs generally have
special needs that result in higher spending.
* Nationally, traditional public school districts spent 3.8 percent of total current
expenditures on salaries for
special education teachers; all charter schools spent 2.2 percent.
(c) For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014, and each fiscal year thereafter, the governing authority for each state charter school shall annually make available
on the Internet web site of such governing authority the aggregate spending
on salaries, employee benefits, instructional supplies, educational media supplies, instructional equipment, regular
education tuition,
special education tuition, purchased services and all other
expenditure items, excluding debt service, for each state charter school under the jurisdiction of such governing authority.
Because of rising pension costs, Louisiana's school districts have already made noticeable cuts to their
expenditures on instructional programs, textbooks and other school supplies, and
special education services.
For the prekindergarten program alone, they identified $ 92,220 in present value benefits and $ 8,512 in present value costs in 2007 dollars — a benefit - cost ratio of 10.83 to 1.22 The benefits derived mainly from reduced public
education expenditures due to lower grade retention and use of
special education, reduced costs to the criminal justice system and victims of crime due to lower crime rates, reduced
expenditures on child welfare due to less child abuse and neglect, higher projected earnings of center participants, and increased income tax revenue due to projected higher lifetime earnings of center participants.